Skip to main content
Log in

Does research productivity decline with age?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research productivity of psychologists holding appointment in British universities was studied within a cross-sequential design. Publication rates in 1968–1970 and 1978–1980 were compared across groups differing in terms of chronological age and date of birth. At both times of measurement psychologists above 45 years of age published less frequently than younger psychologists. Psychologists who held appointment in 1980 as well as 1970 published less frequently in 1978–1980 than in 1968–1970, irrespective of their age in 1970. Although productivity dropped with age, there was considerable variability in output between younger and older psychologists. Further, a person's publication rate in 1978–1980 was better predicted by their past productivity (publication rate in 1968–1970) than by their age. These results are discussed in the context of factors that affect research productivity, as well as changes that will occur in the age distribution of British academics over the next 20 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayer, A. E. and Dutton, J. E. (1977). “Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists,” Journal of Higher Education 48: 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1979). “Age and scientific performance,” American Journal of Sociology 84: 958–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, W. (1956). “Age and achievement: a critique,” Journal of Gerontology 11: 331–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, C. V. (1981). “New academic positions: the outlook in Europe and North America,” Science 212: 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and Achievement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. and Endler, N. S. (1977). “The scholarly impact and research productivity of departments of psychology in the United Kingdom,” Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 30: 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. and Meltzer, S. (1981). “Research productivity, university revenue, and scholarly impact (citations) of 169 British, Canadian, and United States universities,” Scientometrics 3: 275–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W. (1973). “Methodological problems in descriptive developmental research on adulthood and aging,” Ch. 12 in J. R. Nesselroade and H. W. Reese (eds.), Life-span Developmental Psychology: Methodological Issues. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W., Labouvie, G. V. and Buech, B. V. (1973). “Generational and cohortspecific differences in adult cognitive functioning: A fourteen-year study of independent samples,” Developmental Psychology 9: 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W. and Parham, I. A. (1977). “Cohort-sequential analyses of adult intellectual development,” Developmental Psychology 13: 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K. G. and White, M. J. (1978). “On the relation between productivity and impact,” Australian Psychologist 13: 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. L., Blackstone, T. and Metcalf, D. (1974). The Academic Labour Market: Economic and Social Aspects of a Profession. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Over, R. Does research productivity decline with age?. High Educ 11, 511–520 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194416

Keywords

Navigation