Abstract
Competencies for designing and evaluating scientific inquiries are a key emphasis in national curriculums worldwide and a focus of international large-scale assessment. Teachers globally are encouraged to provide learning opportunities for their students to explore and practice asking and conducting researchable questions. This study focused on the competencies of formulating researchable questions and conducting quality investigations, which are the cornerstones of the scientific method. Thirty-eight (n = 38) second year, Australian undergraduate pre-service teachers (aged 19–40 years) participated in a semester-long course of teaching intervention. The study investigated pre-service teachers’ pre- and post-affective attitudes toward science, epistemic beliefs, and developmental performances in the context of formulating and planning practical science investigations. T-test results demonstrated that pre-service teachers’ post- results in formulating research questions (t = −8.34, p < .001, d = 1.40) and planning investigations (t = −7.83, p < .001, d = 1.34) were significantly higher than their pre- scores. Additional structural relationship analyses revealed that in the early stages of developing a scientific investigation, the positive and significant predictive coefficient for pre-service teachers in formulating research questions was epistemological beliefs. In the final reporting stage of the investigation, pre-service teachers’ scientific affective attitudes positively predicted their improved planning investigations. The results highlight the unique affordance of providing practical experiences of fair testing in pre-service science teacher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACARA. (2020). Australian curriculum: Science. Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority.
Anggreani, S. S., Sahyar, & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2017). The effect of scientific inquiry model with adobe flash programm and scientific attitudes students’ science process skills at senior high school. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 104, 388–393.
Aydinli, E., Dokme, I., Ünlüa, Z. K., Öztürk, N., Demir, R., & Benli, E. (2011). Turkish elementary school students’ performance on integrated science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3469–3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.320.
Aydoǧdu, B. (2015). The investigation of science process skills of science teachers in terms of some variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 582–594. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2097.
Cakiroglu, U., Guven, O., & Saylan, E. (2020). Flipping the experimentation process: Influences on science process skills. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09830-0
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526.
Capps, D. K., Shemwell, J. T., & Young, A. M. (2016). Over reported and misunderstood? A study of teachers’ reported enactment and knowledge of inquiry-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 934–959.
Chabalengula, V. M., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How pre-service teachers’ understand and perform science process skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 167–176.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R., Jr. (2014). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (8th ed.). College of Education Faculty Publications: Pearson.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emereole, H. U. (2009). Learners’ and teachers’ conceptual understanding of science processes: The case of Botswana. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1033–1056.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Harper Collins College Publishers.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Kruea-In, C., Kruea-In, N., & Fakcharoenphol, W. (2015). A study of Thai in-service and pre-service science teachers’ understanding of science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 993–997.
Kustijono, R., Jatmiko, B., & Ibrahim, M. (2018). The effect of scientific attitudes toward science process skills in basic physics practicum by using peer model. International Journal of GEOMATE, 15(50), 82–87.
Limatahu, I., Wasis, S. S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Development of CCDSR teaching model to improve science process skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 812–827.
Lin, H., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.
Lin, H., Hong, Z., Yang, K., & Lee, S. (2013). The impact of collaborative reflections on teachers’ inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3095–3116.
Mbewe, S., Chabalengula, V. M., & Mumba, F. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ familiarity, interest and conceptual understanding of science process skills. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 22, 76–86.
Molefe, L., Stears, M., & Hobden, S. (2016). Exploring student teachers’ views of science process skills in their initial teacher education programmes. South African Journal of Education, 36(3), 1–12.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012a). A framework for science education. National Academy of Science.
National Research Council. (2012b). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation Development. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, Reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD.
Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the science process skills gap between students with high and low level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266–277.
Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2017). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science process skills in relation to their teaching qualifications and teaching experience. Research in Science Education, 47, 257–281.
Susanti, R., Anwar, Y., & Ermayanti, E. (2019). Implementation of learning based on scientific approach to improve science process skills of biology education students in general biology course. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1166(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012004.
Tifi, A., Natale, N., & Lombardi, A. (2006). Scientists at play: Teaching science process skills. Science in School, 5(1), 37–40.
Tsai, C. C. (1999). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths”: A study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654–674.
Warnich, P., & Meyer, L. (2013). Trainee teachers’ observation of learner-centred instruction and assessment as applied by history and social science teachers. Yesterday & Today, 9, 13–44.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Wu, H. K., & Wu, C. L. (2011). Exploring the development of fifth graders’ practical epistemologies and explanation skills in inquiry-based learning classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9167-4.
Yildirim, M., Çalik, M., & Özmen, H. (2016). A meta-synthesis of Turkish studies in science process skills. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 6518–6539.
Zion, M., Schwartz, R. S., & R. S., Rimerman-Shmueli, E., & Adler, I. (2020). Supporting teachers’ understanding of nature of science and inquiry through personal experience and perception of inquiry as a dynamic process. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1281–1304.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under grant number: MOST 109-2511-H-110-013 and MOST 109-2511-H-110 -005 -MY3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Declarations
This study has fulfilled the technical requirements necessary to demonstrate the use of ethical procedures in researching human participants.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, HH., Wilson, K., VanRooy, W. et al. Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Competencies in Asking and Conducting Researchable Science Questions Using Fair Testing. Res Sci Educ 53, 155–171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10048-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10048-8