Abstract
In this paper, I explain variation in the adoption of student-centred teaching practices among college faculty members in a program designed to promote K-20 instructional reform. I analyze data from a qualitative study of a Math and Science Partnership in order to understand why some faculty members had undergone extensive changes to their practices whereas others had not, even though both groups had demonstrated changes in their beliefs. Findings show that when collective identities focused on reform become more salient than the role identities associated with their teaching positions, faculty members are able to persist through the loss of self-efficacy that results from struggles with new student-centred practices. This study demonstrates how professional communities can enhance “collective efficacy”, thereby affecting whether the cognitive dissonance that accompanies professional development leads to instructional change rather than disengagement from reform initiatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Throughout the paper, I use the term “educators” to refer to both teachers and faculty members.
References
Atar, H. (2007). Investigating inquiry beliefs and nature of science (NOS) conceptions of science teachers as revealed through online learning. Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.
Bandura, A. (1995). Perceived self-efficacy. In A. S. R. Manstead & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Blackwell encyclopaedia of social psychology (pp. 453–454). Oxford: Blackwell.
Battista, M. T. (1994). Teacher beliefs and the reform movement in mathematics education. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(6), 462–463.
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.
Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy: confronting complexity (pp. 25–46). Albany: SUNY.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: a model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84(5), 606–623.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row and Peterson.
Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: the anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2000). Behavior in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury: Sage.
Hudson, P., Miller, S., & Butler, F. (2006). Adapting and merging explicit instruction within reform based mathematics classrooms. American Secondary Education, 35, 19–32.
Kindfield, A. H., & Singer-Gabella, M. (2010). Inscriptional practices in undergraduate introductory science courses: a path toward improving prospective K-6 teachers’ understanding and teaching of science. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(3), 58–88.
Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77–97.
Lawler, E. J. (2001). Interaction, emotion, and collective identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 263–269.
Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247–258.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Morrell, P. D., Wainwright, C., & Flick, L. (2004). Reform teaching strategies used by student teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(5), 199–213.
Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185.
QSR International. (2006). NVivo (version 7.0) [computer software]. Melbourne: QSR International.
Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3–24.
Settlage, J., Southerland, S. A., Smith, L. K., & Ceglie, R. (2009). Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: self-efficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 102–125.
Siry, C. (2013). Exploring the complexities of children’s inquiries in science: knowledge production through participatory practices. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2407–2430.
Southerland, S., Sowell, S., Blanchard, M., & Granger, E. M. (2011). Exploring the construct of pedagogical discontentment: a tool to understand science teachers’ openness to reform. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 299–317.
Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: the mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175.
Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4, 558–564.
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–287.
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: the role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158.
Walczyk, J., & Ramsey, L. L. (2003). The use of learner centred instruction in college science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 566–584.
Wallace, C. W., & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: an examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 936–960.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225–246.
Wenning, C. J. (2005). Minimizing resistance to inquiry-oriented instruction: the importance of climate setting. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(2), 10–15.
Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5–22.
Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the paradox of change without difference: a model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform. Educational Policy, 16, 763–782.
Wu, H. K., & Wu, C. L. (2011). Exploring the development of fifth graders’ practical epistemologies and explanation skills in inquiry-based learning classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 319–340.
Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15.
Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olitsky, S. Facilitating Changes in College Teaching Practices: Instructional Reform, Identity Conflict and Professional Community in a K-20 Partnership. Res Sci Educ 45, 625–646 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9441-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9441-y