Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inland fisheries development versus aquatic biodiversity conservation in China and its global implications

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China is unique among nations on account of its rich aquatic biodiversity (1443 inland fish species comprising 10% of those worldwide), status as the world’s largest producer (50%) of inland fish, and recent history of significant disruption of natural ecosystems. Ecological Civilization, a policy increasingly advocated in China since 2015, provides a strong platform to protect aquatic ecosystems and restore biodiversity in inland waters. We reviewed processes, policies, and outcomes related to inland fisheries and aquatic biodiversity during the 70 years since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China. Particular focus was on recent transformations in inland fisheries development and protection of inland aquatic biodiversity (IAB) under the goals of China’s recent Ecological Civilization policy. We describe how Chinese inland fisheries have undergone three transformative historical phases, (1) rapid development, (2) over-exploitation, and (3) vigorous protection. A series of newly introduced policies and programs hold promise for rehabilitating IAB. Global implications are considered by comparison with many of the world’s major river basins. We highlight the challenge of balancing fisheries development with biodiversity conservation; avoiding incidental adverse effects on conservation; rationalizing development under protection; eliminating gaps between protected areas, averting extinction and restoring endangered species; and integrating protection in managing watershed ecosystems. In the context of the global decline in freshwater biodiversity, the 70 years of fisheries development and biodiversity conservation in Chinese inland waters serve as a leading example for global IAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0900801), the Science and Technology Project of Guizhou Province, China ([2020]4Y027), and the Project of Yangtze Fisheries Resources and Environment Investigation from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Hui Zhang, Jinming Wu, Harry Gorfine; Formal analysis and investigation: Hui Zhang, Jinming Wu, Harry Gorfine, Xiujuan Shan, Li Shen, Haile Yang, Hao Du, Junyi Li, Chengyou Wang; Qiong Zhou, Zhigang Liu; Writing—original draft preparation: Hui Zhang, Harry Gorfine, Myounghee Kang; Writing—review and editing: Harry Gorfine; Funding acquisition: Hui Zhang, Qiwei Wei.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Harry Gorfine, Myounghee Kang or Qiwei Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 151 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Wu, J., Gorfine, H. et al. Inland fisheries development versus aquatic biodiversity conservation in China and its global implications. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 30, 637–655 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09622-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09622-y

Keywords

Navigation