Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The spatial correlation and interaction between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses spatial simultaneous equation models to analyze the two-way mechanism between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment (FDI). The results, based on data from 285 cities in China from 2003 to 2014, show the following. (1) Not only does environmental regulation have a significant impact on the location choice of FDI, but FDI tends to flow to a city with more relaxed environmental regulation. Environmental regulation can also trigger the near transfer effect of FDI. (2) FDI has a significant spatial spillover effect and this spatial spillover effect has an important impact on FDI and environmental regulation in a particular city. (3) Although multinationals choose a city with more relaxed environmental regulations when they invest in China, FDI inflows have increased both the number and severity of local environmental regulations, indicating that the “pollution haven” hypothesis does not hold in China. (4) Environmental regulation has a significant spatial spillover effect, and this spatial spillover effect has an important impact on both environmental regulation and FDI in cities. In China, there is also a local competitive effect of environmental regulation, albeit with significant regional differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apergis, N. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 54(2), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2007). Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics, 140, 260–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2008). Estimating regional trade agreement effects on FDI in an interdependent world. Journal of Econometrics, 145, 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B. A., Davies, R. B., Waddell, G. R., & Naughton, H. T. (2007). FDI in space: spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 51, 1303–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z. H. (2016). The spatial correlation and interaction between manufacturing agglomeration and environmental pollution. Ecological Indicators, 61(2), 1024–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. H. (2014). Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2005). FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: A missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 530–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2006). Endogenous pollution havens: Does FDI influence environmental regulation? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(1), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2009). Institutionalized pollution havens. Ecological Economics, 68, 1239–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, L. M. (2016). How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: Integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis. Economia Politica, 32, 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2008). Environmental regulation and MNEs location: Does CSR matter? Ecological Economics, 67, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. M., Lovely, M. E., & Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, B. R., Mathew, A. J., & Mukherjee, A. (2011). Environmental regulation: An incentive for foreign direct investment. Review of International Economics, 19(3), 568–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, B. M., Gong, J., & Zhao, X. (2012). FDI and environmental regulation: Pollution haven or a race to the top? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 41, 216–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. J. R., & Shimamoto, K. (2008). Are ASEAN countries havens for Japanese pollution-intensive industry? The World Economy, 31(2), 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. J. R., & Zhou, Y. (2013). Environmental regulation induced foreign direct investment. Environmental & Resource Economics, 55, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, A. M. (2014). Foreign direct investment and environmental regulations: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(5), 943–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, I., Missios, P., & Yildiz, H. M. (2015). Pollution havens, endogenous environmental policy and foreign direct investment. Southern Economic Journal, 82(1), 257–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2002). Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. States. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garretsen, H., & Peeters, J. (2009). FDI and the relevance of spatial linkages: Do third-country effects matter for Dutch FDI? Review of World Economics, 145, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (1954). The Market as a factor in the localization and geographic concentration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64, 315–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyvaert, V. (2013). Regulatory competition-accounting for the transitional dimension of environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Law, 25(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamova, M., & Johnstone, N. (2011). Environmental policy stringency and foreign direct investment. OECD Environment Working Papers; No. 33.

  • Kelejian, H. H., & Prucha, I. R. (2004). Estimation of simultaneous systems of spatially interrelated cross sectional equations. Journal of Econometrics, 118(1), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberg, D. K. (2009). An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 78, 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, C., & Shimamoto, K. (2008). The effect of environmental regulation on the locational choice of Japanese foreign direct investment. Applied Economics, 40(11), 1399–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky, D. M. (2007). Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 853–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky, D. M. (2009). Assessing U.S. State susceptibility to environmental regulatory competition. State Politics Policy Quarterly, 9(4), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukenova, M., & Monteiro, J. A. (2008). Does lax environmental regulation attract FDI when accounting for “third-country” effects? Irene Working Papers.

  • Lan, J., Kakinaka, M., & Huang, X. G. (2012). Foreign direct investment, human capital and environmental pollution in China. Environmental & Resource Economics, 51, 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. D., Lee, W. Y., & Kang, K. C. (2014). Pollution haven with technological externalities arising from foreign direct investment. Environmental & Resource Economics, 57, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (2003). Environmental regulatory competition: A status report and some new evidence. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Song, J. P., Wang, E. R., et al. (2014). Economic growth and pollutant emissions in China: A spatial econometric analysis. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment A, 28(2), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, J. A., & Co, C. Y. (2000). The effects of environmental regulation on foreign direct investment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, E., & Kneller, R. (2012). Environmental regulation, outward FDI and heterogeneous firms: Are countries used as pollution havens? Environmental & Resource Economics, 51, 317–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marconi, D. (2012). Environmental regulation and revealed comparative advantages in Europe: Is China a pollution haven? Review of International Economics, 20(3), 616–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet, D. L., & Roy, J. (2016). Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31, 652–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulatu, A., Gerlagh, R., Rigby, D., & Wossink, A. (2010). Environmental regulation and industry location in Europe. Environmental & Resource Economics, 45, 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poelhekke, S., & Van Der Ploeg, F. (2015). Green havens and pollution havens. The World Economy, 38(7), 1159–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J., & Oh, C. H. (2013). Environmental regulation and multinational corporations’ foreign market entry investments. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(2), 243–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. Y. (2006). A simultaneous estimation of environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 17(4), 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska, B. K., & Wei, S. J. (2005). Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: Dirty secret or popular myth? Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(2), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. T. (2015). Testing the pollution haven effect: Does the type of FDI matter? Environmental & Resource Economics, 60, 549–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tole, L., & Koop, G. (2011). Do environmental regulations affect the location decisions of multinational gold mining firms? Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, U. J., & Timmins, C. D. (2009). Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental & Resource Economics, 43, 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, P. F., Zhang, Z. Y., & Jiang, G. L. (2011). Empirical study of the relationship between FDI and environmental regulation: an intergovernmental competition perspective. Economic Research, 6, 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work in this paper was supported by the Major project of the national social science foundation (Grant No. 16ZDA047), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71803087), the Report Project on the Development of Philosophy and Social Sciences of China’s Ministry of Education (Grant No. 13JBG004), the Jiangsu Social Science Foundation (Grant No. 17EYC010), the Jiangsu project of philosophy and social science foundation (Grant No. 2017SJB0152), the Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhonghua Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Z., Li, L. & Liu, J. The spatial correlation and interaction between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment. J Regul Econ 54, 124–146 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9366-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9366-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation