Abstract
Increasingly, students must demonstrate knowledge in mathematics through mathematics writing, yet research lags in understanding how students engage in mathematics-writing tasks. Most available research on mathematics writing focuses on typically achieving students without considering students with mathematics difficulty (MD). In this study, we explored how students with MD who participated in a word-problem intervention randomized-control trial performed on a mathematics-writing task. We sampled 144 third-grade students with MD and evaluated student performance on an explanatory mathematics-writing measure. Overall, students with MD, on a mathematics-writing rubric with five categories, scored between 1 and 2 points out of a possible 5 points for each category. For one of the five rubric categories, Mathematics Content, the students in the word-problem interventions marginally outperformed the students in the business-as-usual condition. On average, students wrote 33.3 words, numbers, and symbols in response to the mathematics-writing prompt with an average of 8.7 mathematics vocabulary words. Of the mathematics vocabulary words used, students most frequently used formal mathematics vocabulary and names for symbolic numbers, with symbolic symbols and general vocabulary used to a lesser extent. The trends in this study will support future research to enhance mathematics-writing instruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, U. (2010). Skill development in different components of arithmetic and basic cognitive functions: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study of children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016838
Agrawal, J., & Morin, L. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12093
Arsenault, T. L., & Powell, S. R. (2022). Word-problem performance differences by schema: A comparison of students with and without mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12273
Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2005). Writing in mathematics: An alternative form of communication for academically low-achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00127.x
Berninger, V. W. (2009). Highlights of programmatic, interdisciplinary research on writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00281.x
Björn, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2016). Primary school text comprehension predicts mathematical word problem-solving skills in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.992392
Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., Cahill, J., Cardetti, F., Choppin, J. M., Cohen, J., Cole, S., Colonnese, M. W., Copley, J., DiCicco, M., Dieckmann, J., Dorl, J., Gavin, M. K., Hebert, M. A., Karp, K. S., LaBella, E., Moschkovich, J. N., Moylan, K., Olinghouse, N. G., Powell, S. R., Price, E., Pugalee, D. K., Rupp Fulwiler, B., Sheffield, L. J., & Zawodniak, R. (2016). Types of and purposes for elementary mathematical writing: Task force recommendations. https://mathwriting.education.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1454/2016/04/Types_of_and_Purposes_for_Elementary_Mathematical_Writing_for_Web-2.pdf
Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, L. S., Elias, J. T., Powell, S. R., & Schumacher, R. F. (2015). Cognitive and mathematical profiles for different forms of learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413494239
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cohen, J. A., Miller, H. C., Casa, T. M., & Firmender, J. M. (2015). Characteristics of second graders’ mathematical writing. School Science and Mathematics, 115, 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12138
Forsyth, S. R., & Powell, S. R. (2017). Differences in the mathematics-vocabulary knowledge of fifth-grade students with and without learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12144
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Hamlett, C. L., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Is word-problem solving a form of text comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.20151005745
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., Cutting, L. E., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2019). Connections between reading comprehension and word-problem solving via oral language comprehension: Implications for comorbid learning disabilities. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(165), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20288
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025398
Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026683
Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Rigby-Wills, H. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070
Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
Hebert, M. A., & Powell, S. R. (2016). Examining fourth-grade mathematics writing: Features of organization, mathematics vocabulary, and mathematical representations. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1511–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9649-5
Hebert, M. A., Powell, S. R., Bohaty, J. J., & Roehling, J. (2019). Piloting a mathematics writing intervention with late elementary students at-risk for learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 34(3), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12202
Hecht, S. A., & Vagi, K. J. (2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019824
Hughes, E. M., & Lee, J.-Y. (2020). Effects of a mathematical writing intervention on middle school students’ performance. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1677537
Hughes, E. M., Lee, J.-Y., Cook, M. J., & Riccomini, P. J. (2019). Exploratory study of a self-regulation mathematical writing strategy: Proof-of-concept. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 17(2), 185–203.
Hughes, E. M., Riccomini, P. J., & Lee, J.-Y. (2020). Investigating written expressions of mathematical reasoning for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100775
Idris, N. (2009). Enhancing students’ understanding in calculus trough writing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229
Jitendra, A. K., Nelson, G., Pulles, S. M., Kiss, A. J., & Houseworth, J. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties? Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
Jitendra, A. K., Rodriguez, M., Kanive, R., Huang, J.-P., Church, C., Corroy, K. A., & Zaslofsky, A. (2013). Impact of small-group tutoring interventions on the mathematical problem solving and achievement of third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712457561
Jordan, N. C., & Hanich, L. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300605
Kasmer, L. A., & Kim, O. K. (2012). The nature of student predictions and learning opportunities in middle school algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9336-z
Kostos, K., & Shin, E. (2010). Using math journals to enhance second graders’ communication of mathematical thinking. Day Care and Early Education, 38(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0390-4
Kiuhara, S. A., Rouse, A. G., Dai, T., Witzel, B. S., Morphy, P., & Unker, B. (2020). Constructing written arguments to develop fraction knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000391
Lim, L., & Pugalee, D. K. (2004). Using journal writing to explore they communicate to learn mathematics and they learn to communicate mathematically. Ontario Action Researcher, 7(2), 17–24.
Mancl, D. B., Miller, S. P., & Kennedy, M. (2012). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence with integrated strategy instruction to teach subtraction with regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(4), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00363.x
Monroe, E. E., & Panchyshyn, R. (1995). Vocabulary considerations for teaching mathematics. Childhood Education, 72(2), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1996.10521849
Moran, A. S., Swanson, H. L., Gerber, M. M., & Fung, W. (2014). The effects of paraphrasing interventions on problem-solving accuracy for children at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12035
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards mathematics. http://corestandards.org/
Nelson, G., & Powell, S. R. (2018a). A systematic review of longitudinal studies of mathematics difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417714773
Nelson, G., & Powell, S. R. (2018b). Computation error analysis: Students with mathematics difficulty compared to typically achieving students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/153450841774567
Norton, A., & Rutledge, Z. (2010). Measuring task posing cycles: Mathematical letter writing between algebra students and preservice teachers. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 32–45.
Peltier, C., & Vannest, K. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of schema instruction on the problem-solving performance of elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317720163
Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance among fourth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.006
Powell, S. R., & Hebert, M. A. (2016). Influence of writing ability and computation skill on mathematics writing. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 310–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/688887
Powell, S. R., Hebert, M. A., Cohen, J. A., Casa, T. M., & Firmender, J. M. (2017). A synthesis of mathematics writing: Assessments, interventions, and surveys. Journal of Writing Research, 8(3), 493–526. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.04
Powell, S. R., Hebert, M. A., & Hughes, E. M. (2021a). How educators use mathematics writing in the classroom: A national survey of mathematics educators. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(2), 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10076-8
Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., Fall, A-M., Roberts, G., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2021b). Alternative paths to improved word-problem performance: An advantage for embedding pre algebraic reasoning instruction within word-problem intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000513
Powell, S. R., & Hebert, M. A. (2022). Thinking beyond symbols: Writing and reading in mathematics. In Z. A. Philippakos & S. Graham (Eds.), Writing and reading connections: Bridging research and classroom practice (pp. 246–264). Guilford
Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0501_2
Shield, M., & Galbraith, P. (1998). The analysis of student expository writing in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003109819256
Stonewater, J. K. (2002). The mathematics writer’s checklist: The development of a preliminary assessment tool for writing in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18216.x
Tan, T., & Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2016). The effect of journal writing on mathematics achievement among high-ability students in Singapore. Gifted and Talented International, 28(1–2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2013.11678412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Arsenault, T.L., Powell, S.R., Hebert, M.A. et al. Mathematics-writing profiles for students with mathematics difficulty. Read Writ 36, 2025–2052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10375-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10375-2