Abstract
The paper examines the role of context in reading unpointed Hebrew, demonstrating the changing nature of reliance on context during the course of reading acquisition. We analyze the reading-aloud of sentences with heterographic-homographic ambiguity, aiming to shed light on the development of ambiguity resolution processes in typically developing schoolaged and adult populations. 171 Hebrew-speaking children and adolescents in seven age/schooling groups (beginning and end of second grade, third, fourth, seventh, and eleventh grade), and a group of adults, participated in the study. Using homographic garden-path and non-Garden-path sentences, we demonstrate the cumulative effect of context as well as processes of monitoring cum reanalysis. Two hypotheses are borne out in the present research: First, context effect is inherent to reading; it is present throughout all age/grade groups, becoming more efficient with age/grade level. Second, monitoring and reanalysis lag far behind context effects, appearing only as age and reading experience increase.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We use both Hebrew letters and capital Latin letters in representing unpointed written Hebrew words so as to facilitate understanding in readers who are not familiar with Hebrew (Ravid, 2005). Hebrew is read from right to left.
For example, the string BHSKMTK בהסכמתך ‘with your permission’ pronounced behaskamatex contains the core noun HSKMH הסכמה, composed of a root and a noun pattern. This noun is preceded by the proposition be- ‘in/with’, and followed by the inflectional suffix –tex ‘your, feminine’.
The motivation behind assessing reading level with a pointed text (rather than unpointed text, thus matching the assessment with the task in hand) is both methodological and substantial. From a methodological perspective, the national standards for reading rate and accuracy in the first four grades are available only with regard to pointed texts, thus making it impossible to uniformly account for unpointed reading level. And from a theoretical perspective, Schiff (2012) shows that the reading accuracy of pointed words in the second grade mediated the reading speed and comprehension of unpointed scripts. Thus we were able to rely on the pointed reading assessment, regardless of the mismatch with the task.
Hebrew adjectives follow their nouns. Thus, in the phrase מדבר רחב midbar raxav '[a] wide desert', the adjective 'wide' follows the noun 'desert'.
References
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 39–59.
Bar-On, A. (2010). תפקיד הידע הלשוני והתפתחותו בקריאת העברית הלא מנוקדת (The role of linguistic knowledge in learning to read unpointed Hebrew) (Doctoral dissertation). Israel: Tel Aviv University.
Bar-On, A. (2015). קריאה בצל ההומוגרפיות: הבעיה היא גם הפתרון (Reading in the shadow of homography: The problem is the solution). Oriyanut VeSafa, 5, 99–120.
Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological decoding in Hebrew pseudowords: A developmental study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581.
Berman, R. A., & Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language & Literacy, 5(1), 1–43.
Booth, J. R., Harasaki, Y., & Burman, D. D. (2006). Development of lexical and sentence level context effects for dominant and subordinate word meanings of homonyms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(6), 531–554.
Breznitz, Z., & Share, D. L. (1992). Effects of accelerated reading rate on memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 193–199.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwella, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407.
Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582.
Ferreira, F., Christianson, K., & Hollingworth, A. (2001). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 3–20.
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 310–329.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Attentuating interference during comprehension: The role of suppression. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 37, 85–104.
Gur, T. (2005). Reading Hebrew vowel diacritics: A longitudinal investigation from grade 1 to grade 3. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. October, 2005. University of Haifa, Isearl.
Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 167–181.
Häikiö, T., Bertrama, R., & Hyönäa, J. (2010). Development of parafoveal processing within and across words in reading: Evidence from the boundary paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 1982–1998.
Khannaa, M. M., & Boland, J. E. (2010). Children’s use of language context in lexical ambiguity resolution. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 160–193.
Lee, C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). Wave-ering: An ERP study of syntactic and semantic context effects on ambiguity resolution for noun/verb homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(4), 538–555.
Leinengera, M., & Raynera, K. (2013). Eye movements while reading biased homographs: Effects of prior encounter and biasing context on reducing the subordinate bias effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 665–681.
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Ournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 667–682.
Nir, R. (1982). כותרות העיתון כיחידות שיח (Newspaper headlines as discourse-units). In S. Blum-Kulka, Y. Tubin, & R. Nir (Eds.), Investigations in discourse analysis (pp. 75–116). Jerusalem: Academon, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Patson, N. D., Darowski, E. S., Moon, N., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: Evidence from a paraphrasing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 280–285.
Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2008). Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: Evidence from lexicalambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 105(2), 71–82.
Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). Understanding written words: Phonological, lexical, and contextual effects in the cerebral hemispheres. In M. Faust (Ed.), The handbook of the neuropsychology of language (pp. 59–76). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perfetti, C. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24.
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Perfetti, C., & McCutchen, D. (1987). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 105–141)., Reading, writing, and language learning Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37.
Ravid, D. (1996). Accessing the mental lexicon: Evidence from incompatibility between representation of spoken and written morphology. Linguistics, 34(6), 1219–1246.
Ravid, D. (2004). Later lexical development in Hebrew: Derivational morphology revisited. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence: Psycholinguistic and crosslinguistic perspectives, TILAR (Trends in Language Acquisition Research) series (pp. 53–82). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ravid, D. (2005). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–363). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ravid, D. (2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun Scale analyses. Journal of Child Language, 33, 791–821.
Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York: Springer.
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2009). Developing linguistic register across text types: The case of modern Hebrew. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(1), 108–145.
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30(1), 3–26.
Ravid, D., & Levie, R. (2010). Hebrew adjectives in later language text production. First Language, 30(1), 27–55.
Ravid, D., & Vered, L. Learning passive forms as lexical items: Later language development in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language. (in press).
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157.
Schiff, R. (2012). Shallow and deep orthographies in Hebrew: The role of vowelization in reading development for unvowelized scripts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(6), 409–424.
Schiff, R., Katzir, T., & Shoshan, N. (2013). Reading accuracy and speed of vowelized and unvowelized scripts among dyslexic readers of Hebrew: The road not taken. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 1–15.
Shany, M., Bar-On, A., & Katzir, T. (2012). Reading different orthographic structures in the shallow-pointed Hebrew script: A cross-grade study in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 25, 1217–1238.
Shany, M., Laxman, D., Shalem, S., Bahat, A., & Zieger, T. (2006). Alef ad taf; Manual. [Alef to Taf: Manual.] Tel Aviv, Israel: Mofet Institute.
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218.
Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 95–129.
Share, D. L., & Bar-On, A. (in press). Learning to read a Semitic abjad: The triplex model of Hebrew reading development. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
Share, D. L., & Levin, I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shimron, J. (1999). The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition. Reading and Writing, 11(4), 301–319.
Shimron, J., & Sivan, T. (1994). Reading proficiency and orthography evidence from Hebrew and English. Language Learning, 44, 5–27.
Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 104–120.
Stanovich, K. E., Nathan, R. G., West, R. F., & Vala-Rossi, M. (1985). Children’s word recognition in context: Spreading activation, expectancy, and modularity. Child Development, 56(6), 1418–1428.
Tabossi, P., & Sbisà, S. (2001). Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior (pp. 11–26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., Feeman, D. J., & Cunningham, A. E. (1983). The effect of sentence context on word recognition in second-and sixth-grade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(1), 6–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bar-On, A., Dattner, E. & Ravid, D. Context effects on heterophonic-homography resolution in learning to read hebrew. Read Writ 30, 463–487 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9685-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9685-1