Abstract
Working possible selves—currently activated images of an ideal or feared future self—have been argued to guide one’s motivation and actions. This study investigated how possible selves affect L2 learners’ motivational behaviors of persistence and effort as shown in essay revision and proofreading. One hundred and twelve ESL students were assigned to one of four conditions: successful future selves, unsuccessful future selves, successful past selves, or successful future of others. Participants were asked to imagine and freewrite about their assigned condition and to revise their essay until they were satisfied with the writing. Following this, participants proofread a reading text containing spelling errors. The time spent on revision was considered as an indicator of persistence, and the number of spelling error corrections was taken to represent effort. The analysis of group differences in performance revealed that the successful past selves group persisted longer in the revision task than the successful future selves group. No group differences were found in the proofreading task. The finding that the successful future selves group scored lowest of the four groups in the revision task contrasts sharply with results from previous research. Possible explanations are discussed in relation to the theory of possible selves and task characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The original pool of participants was 116, but 4 outlying participants were removed for analysis (see “Results” section).
References
Al-Shehri, A. S. (2009). Motivation and vision: The relation between the ideal L2 self, imagination and visual style. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 164–171). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Ames, C. (1986). Effective motivation: The contribution of the learning environment. In R. Feldman (Ed.), The social psychology of education: Current research and theory (pp. 235–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, J., Puchta, H., & Rinvolucri, M. (2007). Imagine that! Mental imagery in the EFL classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Buckner, R., & Carroll, D. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 49–57.
Carver, C., Blaney, P., & Scheier, M. (1979). Reassertion and giving up: The interactive role of self-directed attention and outcome expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1859–1870. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1859.
Chan, L. (2014). Effects of an imagery training strategy on Chinese university students’ possible second language selves and learning experiences. In K. Csizér & M. Magid (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 357–376). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, self-confidence, group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44, 417–448. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01113.x.
Clément, R., Noels, K. A., & Deneault, B. (2001). Interethnic contact, identity, and psychological adjustment: The mediating and moderating roles of communication. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 539–577. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00229.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469–512. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x.
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behaviour. Language Learning, 55, 613–659. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00319.x.
Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–41). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63(3), 437–462. doi:10.1111/lang.12005.
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300. doi:10.1177/136216880000400305.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A.-M. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 344–362. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05495.x.
Hackmann, A., & Holmes, E. A. (2004). Reflecting on imagery: A clinical perspective and overview of the special issue of memory on mental imagery and memory in psychopathology. Memory, 12(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/09658210444000133.
Hall, E., Hall, C., & Leech, A. (1990). Scripted fantasy in the classroom. London: Routledge.
Henry, A. (2015). The dynamics of possible selves. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 83–94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirsch, C. R., Clark, D. M., Mathews, A., & Williams, R. (2003). Self-images play a causal role in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 909–921.
Holmes, E. A., & Mathews, A. (2005). Mental imagery and emotion: A special relationship? Emotion, 5(4), 489–497. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.489.
Hoyle, R. H., Kernis, M. H., Leary, M. R., & Baldwin, M. W. (1999). Selfhood: Identity, esteem, regulation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1673–1696. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00424.x.
Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.593.
Locke, E., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125.
Maehr, M. L., & Braskamp, L. A. (1986). The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Magid, M. (2014). A motivational programme for learners of English: An application of the L2 motivational self system. In K. Csizér & M. Magid (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 333–356). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Magid, M., & Chan, L. (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualize their ideal L2 self: Lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 113–125. doi:10.1080/17501229.2011.614693.
Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.858.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.
Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 167–210. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00212.
Matsumoto, M. (2009). Persistence in Japanese language study and learners’ cultural/linguistic background. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 1001–1017. doi:10.2104/aral0910.
Norman, C., & Aron, A. (2003). Aspects of possible selves that predict motivation to achieve or avoid it. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 500–507. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00029-5.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., Terry, K., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Possible selves as roadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 130–149. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00057-6.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. R. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 112–125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.112.
Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38(3), 467–479. doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.06.011.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Markus, H. (1985). The nature of negative thoughts in depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 799–807. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.799.
Quinn, K. A., & Rosenthal, H. E. S. (2012). Categorizing others and the self: How social memory structures guide social perception and behavior. Learning and Motivation, 43, 247–258.
Ruvolo, A. P., & Markus, H. R. (1992). Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition, 10, 95–124. doi:10.1521/soco.1992.10.1.95.
Sampson, R. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16, 317–335. doi:10.1177/1362168812436898.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kolligian, J, Jr. (1990). Competence considered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Suddendorf, T., & Busby, J. (2003). Mental time travel in animals? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 391–396.
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system amongst Chinese, Japanese, and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–518. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05451.x.
Weiler, J., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2011). What comes first? Electrophysiological differences in the temporal course of memory and future thinking. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 1742–1750.
Yowell, C. M. (2002). Dreams of the future: The pursuit of education and career possible selves among ninth grade Latino youth. Applied Developmental Science, 6(2), 62–72. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0602_2.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Dr. Richard Schmidt and Dr. Lourdes Ortega for their support and guidance for this research. This research was supported by Holmes-Carr Research Grant from University of Hawai’i which I greatly appreciate. I would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their feedback and suggestions.
Conflict of interest
I declare that Reading and Writing is an exclusive journal for which this paper is currently submitted for consideration of publication. However, part of the data collected from this study was used for further analysis from a different perspective. Specifically, the results were reanalyzed in terms of cognitive demands of tasks, entitled as “Task demands on learner motivation and performance in L2 writing” and the results were presented at the Biennial International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching 2014. The manuscript is currently under preparation, which will be submitted to international journal in the near future.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Instructions for each condition
-
1.
Successful future selves
Imagine yourself in the future. Everything has gone as well as it possibly could have. You have worked hard and have succeeded in achieving your goals.
Now, write one narrative essay about your successful future. You can think of those questions when writing: “What are you imagining? What do you see yourself doing? What kind of environment are you in? What types of people are around you?” Describe what you are imagining. In this imagined scene, how do you feel in your imagined scene? What do you do on a typical day?
-
2.
Unsuccessful future selves
Imagine yourself in the future. Everything has gone as badly as it possibly could have. You have worked hard but have failed to achieve your goals.
Now, write one narrative essay about your unsuccessful future. You can think of those questions when writing: “What are you imagining? What do you see yourself doing? What kind of environment are you in? What types of people are around you?” Describe how you feel in your imagined scene. In this imagined scene, what do you do on a typical day?
-
3.
Successful past selves
Think about your most memorable success in the past. You worked so hard to achieve your goals, and you had succeeded in achieving your goals.
Now, write one narrative essay about your successful past. You can think of those questions when writing: “What are you thinking? What did you do? do you see yourself doing? What kind of environment were you in? What types of people were around you?” Describe how you felt in your past successful story. In this imagined scene, what was your typical day after the success?
-
4.
Successful future of others
Think about someone you have come to know very well at the university. Everything has gone as well as it possibly could have. He or she has worked hard and has succeeded in achieving his or her goals.
Now, write one narrative essay about your friend’s successful future. You can think of those questions when writing: “What are you imagining? What do you see him/her doing? What kind of environment is he/she in? What types of people are around him/her? How does he/she feel in your imagined scene?” Describe what you are imagining. In this imagined scene, what does he/she do on a typical day?
Appendix 2
Reading text for a proofreading task (with spelling errors identified)
-
1.
The Eiffel Tower
What is the most famouus place in Paris? Most people give the same anwser—the Eiffel Tower. It was the idae of Gustave Eiffel. Some peple in Paris did not like the plans for the tower. But the world was diffrent now. More and more was posible, and Eiffel understood this.
He finshed the tower and showed it to the world in 1889. At the timee it was the tallest building in the world—324 meters. Eiffel understood one of the bigest problems for tall buildings—the wind. Srtong winds are not a problem for teh Eiffel Tower becuase they can go through it.
Visitors loved the tower from the start. In its fist year, tickets paid for the tower. The Eiffel Tower is the talest building in Paris today, but there are many taller biuldings around the world. This does not stop the mllions of visitors—amlost 6.5 million every year.
-
2.
The Great Wall of China
Which is the most famuos wall in the world? For many pople, there is only one answer to this qeustion—the Great Wall of China. Its name in Chinese maens “long wall.” This is a good name becuase at one time the wall was about 6400 km loong.
The Chinese first built a long wall about 2500 yeears ago. It protected the counrty in the north. They built a secodn wall—today’s Great Wall of China—about five hunrded years ago. It was more than a wall; they put towers inn high places on it. At one time more than one million men worked on the waall and protected their country.
Today many pople visit the Great Wall every year. Some partss are more famous than other parts. Visitors often go to a part of teh wall to the north of the city of Beijing. One place here is 7.8 m high and 5 m wiide. Some of the most famous and beuatiful parts of the wall climb through the mountains. The highesst tower is at 980 m.
-
3.
Palm Islands, Dubai
Dubai has beuatiful hot weather for visitors. But people like beeaches and Dubai wanted more. The answer was eassy—they built islands with more beaches. Work onn the three islands started in 2003. They are very differnt from other natural islands. There are now homes, aparmtents, stores, and workplaces on them. More than one millon people can live there. Many visitors from around the world come to the isladns for vacations.
Next, buiders in Dubai built “The World.” This has 300 smalll islands. Again, you can undestand the name when you see the islands from above. Wiht these and the three Palm Islands, there are now 1500 km of new baech in Dubai. And there wil be more artificial islands there.
-
4.
Venice
One of the world’s most famous cities is not only on one islannd; it is on about 120 islands. Some poeple call Venice, in the north-east of Italy, the “City of Water.” There are no big streeets, but the city has 150 canals. The lognest of these—at only 3 km—is the Grand Canal. People can go aruond the city in their boats or in “boat taxis” and “baot buses.” They can walk around the city eaasily, too: there are 400 briges.
-
5.
The Great Pyramid
The Great Pyramid at Giza, nearr Cairo in Egypt, was on Herodotus’s list of Seven Wonders, and it is very famuos today, too. The pyramid is 4500 yaers old and 150 m tall. Peple think that there are about 2.3 million big stones inn it. Each stone is very heavvy—more than 2000 kilos. So how did the Egyptian biuld the pyramid with these big, heavy stones? There are a lot of idaes, but we do not reallyy know.
We do know the anwser to another question—why did the Egyptians build teh pyramids? For the ancient Egyptians, the eend of life in our world was the start of another life. The pyramids were forr the country’s dead rulers. The daed rulers—and many of their thigns—went into the pyramid. The rulerss were rich when they were ded, too!
Khufu built the Great Pyramid. It toook about 20 years. Inside the pyramid there are three roms. Today Giza is on of the most famous places in the word. The Great Pyramid adn the other two pyramids there are a brigde to the ancient world.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, M. The effects of working possible selves on second language performance. Read Writ 28, 1099–1118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9564-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9564-1