Abstract
The Al2O3 supported monometallic Co, Ni and Mo and bimetallic CoMo and NiMo catalysts were compared in rapeseed oil hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) reaction after in situ sulfidation. The reaction was described by five pseudo-first order rate constants (k 1–k 5) for the simplified reaction scheme: triglycerides (Tgs) to octadecane (k 1); Tgs to oxygenates (Oxs; i.e., sum of fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and esters of fatty acids and fatty alcohols) (k 2); Tgs to heptadecane (k 3); Oxs to octadecane (k 4), and Oxs to heptadecane (k 5). The empirical pseudo-first order rate constant of the hydrocarbons (Hcs) product formation (k Hc ) increased in the order Ni/Al2O3 ~ Co/Al2O3 < CoMo/Al2O3 ~ Mo/Al2O3 ≪ NiMo/Al2O3 showing hence a significant synergy between Ni and Mo. All monometallic catalysts exhibited k 1 and k 3 practically zero and the reaction proceeded essentially through the formation of the oxygenated reaction intermediates (high k 2). The Co/Al2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalyzed selectively hydrodecarboxylation (HDC) of fatty acids (high k 5). Over Mo/Al2O3, the HDO pathway, however, was nearly the exclusive one (high k4). CoMo/Al2O3 and NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts yielded both HDO and HDC products suggesting partial synergy in the relative selectivity HDO/HDC between Co(Ni) and Mo.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baladincz P, Tóth C, Hancsók J (2012) Chem Eng Trans 29:1237–1242
Kubičková I, Kubička D (2010) Waste Biomass Valoriz 1:293–308
Kiatkittipong W, Phimsen S, Kiatkittipong K, Wongsakulphasatch S, Laosiripojana N, Assabumrungrat S (2013) Fuel ProcessTechnol 116:16–26
Hachemi I, Kumar N, Mäki-Arvela P, Roine J, Peurla M, Hemming J, Salonen J, Murzin DY (2017) J Catal 347:205–221
Jeništová K K, Hachemi I, Mäki-Arvela P, Kumar N, Peurla M, Čapek L, Wärnå J, Murzin DY (2017) Chem Eng J 316:401–409
Srifa A, Faungnawakij K, Itthibenchapong V, Viriya-empikul N, Charinpanitkul T, Assabumrungrat S (2014) Bioresour Technol 158:81–90
Hancsók J, Kasza T, Kovács S, Solymosi P, Holló A (2012) J Clean Prod 34:76–81
Şenol OI, Ryymin EM, Viljava TR, Krause AOI (2007) J Mol Catal A 268:1–8
Varakin AN, Salnikov VA, Nikulshina MS, Maslakov KI, Mozhaev AV, Nikulshin PA (2017) Catal Today 292:110–120
Nikul’shin PA, Sal’nikov VA, Pimerzin AA, Eremina YV, Koklyukhin AS, Tsvetkov VS, Pimerzin AA (2016) Pet Chem 56:56–61
Laurent E, Delmon B (1994) Appl Catal A 109:77–115
Szarvas T, Eller Z, Kasza T, Ollár T, Tétényi P, Hancsók J (2015) Appl Catal B 165:245–252
Ceclan RE, Pop A, Ceclan M (2012) Chem Eng Trans 29:1177–1182
Martins MI, Pires RF, Alves MJ, Hori CE, Reis MHM, Cardos VL (2013) Chem Eng Trans 32:817–822
Nascimento FP, Oliveira ARG, Paredes MLL, Costa ALH, Pessoa FLP (2013) Chem Eng Trans 32:829–834
Ignat RM, Kiss AA (2012) Chem Eng Trans 29:1141–1146
Smoláková L, Pöpperle L, Kocík J, Dubnová L, Horáček J, Čapek L (2017) Reac Kinet Mech Cat 121:209–224
Kubička D, Horáček L, Setnička M, Bulánek R, Zukal A, Kubičková I (2014) Appl Catal B 145:101–107
Coumans AE, Hensen EJM (2017) Appl Catal B 201:290–301
Zhou L, Lawal A (2017) Appl Catal A 532:40–49
Donnis B, Egeberg RG, Blom P, Knudsen KG (2009) Top Catal 52:229–240
Han Y, Stankovikj F, Garcia-Perez M (2017) Fuel Process Technol 159:328–339
Sugami Y, Minami E, Saka S (2017) Fuel 197:272–276
Kubička D, Kaluža L (2010) Appl Catal A 372:199–208
Furimsky E (2013) Catal Today 217:13–56
Costa PR (2007) PTQ Biofuels 2007:32–33
Neste Oil (2012) Neste Oil, Espoo. http://www.nesteoil.com/default.asp?path=1,41,11991,22708. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
Neste Oil (2012) Neste Oil, Espoo. http://www.nesteoil.com/default.asp?path¼1,41,11991,12243,13565. Accessed 1 Feb 2012
Hodge C (2006) Workshop on bioenergy. California Energy Commission. http://www.energy.ca.gov/bioenergy_action_plan/documents/2006-03-09_workshop/2006-03-09_NESTE_OIL.PDF. Accessed 9 March 2012
UOP (2012) UOP/ENI, Erkrath. http://www.uop.com/hydroprocessing-ecofining, Accessed 1 Oct 2012
Frey S (2011) Honeywell development of green jet fuel technology. In: IAE Bioenergy ExCo67 meeting, paper 08, Helsinki
Kalnes TN, Marker T, Shonnard D, Koers KP (2008) PTQ Biofuels 2008:7–11
Gosselink RW, Hollak SAW, Chang SW, Van Haveren J, De Jong KP, Bitter JH, Van Es DS (2013) ChemSusChem 6:1576–1594
Šimáček P, Kubička D, Šebor G, Pospíšil M (2010) Fuel 89:611–615
Kaluža L, Vít Z, Zdražil M (2005) Appl Catal A 282:247–253
Kaluža L, Gulková D, Vít Z, Zdražil M (2007) Appl Catal A 324:30–35
Acknowledgements
L.K. gratefully appreciates and acknowledges the financial support of the Czech Science Foundation (Grant No. 17-22490S).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaluža, L., Kubička, D. The comparison of Co, Ni, Mo, CoMo and NiMo sulfided catalysts in rapeseed oil hydrodeoxygenation. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 122, 333–341 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1247-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1247-2