Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life in various health conditions: two consecutive surveys of older Japanese adults

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in various health conditions in different countries is important given the regional differences. This study employed large-scale nationwide data targeting older adults in Japan to estimate the HRQOL in the key health conditions that are the major causes of disability.

Methods

Our data were derived from two survey waves (2016 and 2019 surveys) of cross-sectional data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, an ongoing nationwide study targeting functionally independent older adults in Japan. A total of 28,345 individuals from 27 of the 47 Japanese provinces were analyzed. The EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L) was employed to assess the HRQOL utility scores. The targeted minimum loss-based estimator with sampling weighting methods was applied to estimate the utility score in eight major health conditions, including sensory organ disease, musculoskeletal disease, oral disorders, and depressive disorders.

Results

The estimated HRQOL utility score for those with the poorest health conditions in self-rated health, hearing loss, vision loss, number of remaining teeth (e.g., no teeth with no denture use), oral dysfunction, depressive symptoms, chronic low back pain, and chronic knee pain was 0.576 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.555–0.598), 0.768 (95% CI 0.737–0.800), 0.680 (95% CI 0.662–0.699), 0.809 (95% CI 0.796–0.821), 0.776 (95% CI 0.764–0.788), 0.723 (95% CI 0.710–0.737), 0.715 (95% CI 0.690–0.739), and 0.742 (95% CI 0.722–0.763), respectively.

Conclusion

We successfully provided a catalog for the HRQOL utility score in key health conditions that are the leading causes of disability among older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is not suitable for public deposition due to ethical concerns. Data are from the JAGES study. Requests for data may be sent to the data management committee: dataadmin@jages.net.

References

  1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. (2018). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 392(10159), 1789–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GBD 2019 Ageing Collaborators. (2022). Global, regional, and national burden of diseases and injuries for adults 70 years and older: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. BMJ, 376, e068208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, S. Y., Franchetti, M. K., Imanbayev, A., Gallo, J. J., Spira, A. P., & Lee, H. B. (2012). Non-pharmacological prevention of major depression among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review of the efficacy of psychotherapy interventions. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 55, 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feltner, C., Wallace, I. F., Kistler, C. E., Coker-Schwimmer, M., & Jonas, D. E. (2021). Screening for hearing loss in older adults: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA, 325, 1202–1215. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.24855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brettschneider, C., Luck, T., Fleischer, S., Roling, G., Beutner, K., Luppa, M., Behrens, J., Riedel-Heller, S. G., & König, H. H. (2015). Cost-utility analysis of a preventive home visit program for older adults in Germany. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0817-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, J. C., Marra, C. A., Robertson, M. C., Khan, K. M., Najafzadeh, M., Ashe, M. C., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2011). Economic evaluation of dose-response resistance training in older women: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. Osteoporosis International, 22, 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1356-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bae, J.-M. (2015). Value-based medicine: Concepts and application. Epidemiology and Health, 37, e2015014. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2015014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, G. C., Brown, M. M., & Sharma, S. (2003). Value-based medicine: Evidence-based medicine and beyond. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, 11, 157–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Basch, E. (2010). The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(10), 865–869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulamu, N. B., Kaambwa, B., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015). A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Szende, A., Janssen, B., & Cabases, J. (2014). Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7596-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondo, K. (2016). Progress in aging epidemiology in Japan: The JAGES project. Journal of Epidemiology, 26(7), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20160093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Devlin, N., Parkin, D., & Janssen, B. (2020). Methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47622-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikeda, S., Shiroiwa, T., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Fukuda, T., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2015). Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 64(1), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burke, W. J., Roccaforte, W. H., & Wengel, S. P. (1991). The short form of the geriatric depression scale: A comparison with the 30-item form. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 4, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198879100400310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsui, D., Yamamoto, T., Nishigaki, M., Miyatani, F., Watanabe, I., Koyama, T., Ozaki, E., Kuriyama, N., Kanamura, N., & Watanabe, Y. (2016). Validity of self-reported number of teeth and oral health variables. BMC Oral Health, 17, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0248-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiuchi, S., Kusama, T., Sugiyama, K., Yamamoto, T., Cooray, U., Yamamoto, T., Kondo, K., Osaka, K., & Aida, J. (2022). Longitudinal association between oral status and cognitive decline using fixed-effects analysis. Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20200476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Igarashi, A., Aida, J., Yamamoto, T., Hiratsuka, Y., Kondo, K., & Osaka, K. (2021). Associations between vision, hearing and tooth loss and social interactions: The JAGES cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inoue, A., Hiratsuka, Y., Takesue, A., Aida, J., Kondo, K., & Murakami, A. (2022). Association between visual status and the frequency of laughter in older Japanese individuals : The JAGES cross- ­ sectional study. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 7, e000908. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000908

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimdars, A., Nazroo, J., & Gjonça, E. (2012). The circumstances of older people in England with self-reported visual impairment: A secondary analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 30, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619611427374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dionne, C. E., Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., Nachemson, A. L., Buchbinder, R., Walker, B. F., Wyatt, M., Cassidy, J. D., Rossignol, M., Leboeuf-Yde, C., & Hartvigsen, J. (2008). A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine, 33, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e7f94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, K. R., Vojir, C. P., Hutt, E., & Fink, R. (2007). Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2006.05.0051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., Fukuda, T., Hamashima, C., Hisashige, A., & Tamura, M. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEC.673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiroiwa, T., Fukuda, T., Ikeda, S., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2016). Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 25, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1108-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiroiwa, T., Noto, S., & Fukuda, T. (2021). Japanese population norms of EQ-5D-5L and health utilities index mark 3: Disutility catalog by disease and symptom in community settings. Value in Health, 24, 1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tabuchi, T., Gallus, S., Shinozaki, T., Nakaya, T., Kunugita, N., & Colwell, B. (2018). Heat-not-burn tobacco product use in Japan: Its prevalence, predictors and perceived symptoms from exposure to secondhand heat-not-burn tobacco aerosol. Tobacco Control, 27, E25–E33. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Díaz, I., Williams, N., Hoffman, K. L., & Schenck, E. J. (2021). Nonparametric causal effects based on longitudinal modified treatment policies. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1955691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schuler, M. S., & Rose, S. (2017). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Polley, E., LeDell, E., & van der Laan, M. (2017). Package “SuperLearner.” Retrieved from https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2018-03-03/web/packages/SuperLearner/SuperLearner.pdf

  30. Schonlau, M., Van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., & Couper, M. (2009). Selection bias in web surveys and the use of propensity scores. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108327128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. (n.d.). Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. Retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hss/cslc.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2022

  32. Henry, E. B., Barry, L. E., Hobbins, A. P., McClure, N. S., & O’Neill, C. (2020). Estimation of an instrument-defined minimally important difference in EQ-5D-5L index scores based on scoring algorithms derived using the EQ-VT version 2 valuation protocols. Value in Health, 23, 936–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller, D. R., Rogers, W. H., Kazis, L. E., Spiro, A., Ren, X. S., & Haffer, S. C. (2008). Patients’ self-report of diseases in the medicare health outcomes survey based on comparisons with linked survey and medical data from the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 31(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAC.0000314707.88160.9c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Berkman, L. F., Kawachi, I., & Glymour, M. M. (2014). Social Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davies, N. M., Dickson, M., Smith, G. D., Van Den Berg, G. J., & Windmeijer, F. (2018). The causal effects of education on health outcomes in the UK Biobank. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0279-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Silles, M. (2015). The causal effect of schooling on smoking behavior. Economics of Education Review, 48, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schisterman, E. F., Cole, S. R., & Platt, R. W. (2009). Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 20(4), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y. S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., Lloyd, A., Scalone, L., Kind, P., & Pickard, A. S. (2012). Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value in Health, 15(5), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study used data from JAGES (the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study). This study was supported by JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) KAKENHI Grant Numbers (19K19818, 21K02001, 22K17648), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (Grant Nos. JP18dk0110027, JP18ls0110002, JP18le0110009, JP20dk0110034, JP21lk0310073, JP21dk0110037, JP21dk0310108h0002), Open Innovation Platform with Enterprises, Research Institute and Academia (OPERA, JPMJOP1831) from the Japan Science and Technology (JST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. TI, YH, NY, JA, KK, and KO: Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TI and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaaki Ikeda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committees at Tohoku University, and all participants provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikeda, T., Hiratsuka, Y., Yanagi, N. et al. Health-related quality of life in various health conditions: two consecutive surveys of older Japanese adults. Qual Life Res 32, 1209–1219 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03295-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03295-9

Keywords

Navigation