Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility estimations of health states of older Australian women with atrial fibrillation using SF-6D

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate SF-6D utility scores for older women with atrial fibrillation (AF); calculate and compare mean utility scores for women with AF with various demographic, health behaviours, and clinical characteristics; and develop a multivariable regression model to determine factors associated with SF-6D utility scores.

Methods

This study evaluated N = 1432 women diagnosed with AF from 2000 to 2015 of the old cohort (born 1921–26) of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH) who remained alive for at least 12 months post first recorded AF diagnosis. Self-reported data on demographics, health behaviours, health conditions, and SF-36 were obtained from the ALSWH surveys, corresponding to within three years of the date of the first record of AF diagnosis. Linked Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data determined the use of oral anticoagulants and comorbid conditions, included in CHA2DS2-VA (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years, Diabetes, Stroke or TIA, Vascular disease and Age 65–74 years) score calculation, were assessed using state-based hospital admissions data. Utility scores were calculated for every woman from their SF-36 responses using the SF-6D algorithm with Australian population norms. Mean utility scores were then calculated for women with various demographic, health behaviours, and clinical characteristics. Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression modelling was performed to determine factors associated with these utility scores. Two different scenarios were used for the analysis: (1) complete-case, for women with complete data on all the SF-36 items required to estimate SF-6D (N = 584 women), and (2) Multiple Imputation (MI) for missing data, applied to missing values on SF-36 items (N = 1432 women). MI scenario was included to gauge the potential bias when using complete data only.

Results

The mean health utility was estimated to be 0.638 ± 0.119 for the complete dataset and 0.642 ± 0.120 for the dataset where missing values were handled using MI. Using the MI technique, living in regional and remote areas (\(\beta = 0.016 \pm 0.007\)) and the use of oral anticoagulants (\(\beta = 0.021 \pm 0.007)\) were positively associated with health utility compared to living in major cities and no use of anticoagulants, respectively. Difficulty to manage on available income \(\left( {\beta = -\,0.027 \pm 0.009} \right)\), no/low physical activity \(\left( {\beta = -\,0.069 \pm 0.011} \right)\), disability \(\left( {\beta = -\,0.097 \pm 0.008} \right)\), history of stroke (\(\beta = -\,0.025 \pm 0.013)\) and history of arthritis \(\left( {\beta = -\,0.024 \pm 0.007} \right)\) were negatively associated with health utility.

Conclusion

This study presents health utility estimates for older women with AF. These estimates can be used in future clinical and economic research. The study also highlights better health utilities for women living in regional and remote areas, which requires further exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data may be obtained by contacting the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (www.alswh.org.au) as they are not publicly available.

References

  1. Lippi, G., Sanchis-Gomar, F., & Cervellin, G. (2020). Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chugh, S. S., Havmoeller, R., Narayanan, K., Singh, D., Rienstra, M., Benjamin, E. J., et al. (2014). Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 129(8), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Witassek, F., Springer, A., Adam, L., Aeschbacher, S., Beer, J. H., Blum, S., et al. (2019). Health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: The role of symptoms, comorbidities, and the type of atrial fibrillation. PloS one, 14(12), e0226730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball, J., Carrington, M. J., McMurray, J. J. V., & Stewart, S. (2013). Atrial fibrillation: Profile and burden of an evolving epidemic in the 21st century. International Journal of Cardiology, 167(5), 1807–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart, S., Hart, C. L., Hole, D. J., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2002). A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. The American Journal of Medicine, 113(5), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01236-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsadok, M. A., Jackevicius, C. A., Rahme, E., Humphries, K. H., Behlouli, H., & Pilote, L. (2012). Sex differences in stroke risk among older patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation. JAMA, 307(18), 1952–1958. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.3490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Volgman, A. S., Manankil, M. F., Mookherjee, D., & Trohman, R. G. (2009). Women with atrial fibrillation: Greater risk, less attention. Gender Medicine, 6(3), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genm.2009.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Humphries, K. H., Kerr, C. R., Connolly, S. J., Klein, G., Boone, J. A., Green, M., et al. (2001). New-onset atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 103(19), 2365–2370. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.19.2365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). Australian Burden of Disease Study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015. Australian Burden of Disease series no. 19. Cat. no. BOD 22. Canberra: AIHW.

  10. Abbas, S. S., Majeed, T., Nair, B. R., Forder, P., Weaver, N., & Byles, J. (2020). Burden of atrial fibrillation and stroke risk among octagenarian and nonagenarian women in Australia. Ann Epidemiol, 44, 31-37.e32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbas, S. S., Majeed, T., Nair, B. R., Forder, P. M., Biostatistics, M., Weaver, N., et al. (2020). Patterns of medications for atrial fibrillation among older women: Results from the australian longitudinal study on women’s health. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248420947278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thrall, G., Lane, D., Carroll, D., & Lip, G. Y. H. (2006). quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(5), 448.e441-448.e419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alex, M. J. G., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Health utility measures and the standard gamble. Academic Emergency Medicine, 10(4), 360–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., & Feeny, D. (2002). Health utility estimation. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2.2.99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Badia, X., Arribas, F., Ormaetxe, J. M., Peinado, R., & de los Terreros, M. S. (2007). Development of a questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF-QoL). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spertus, J., Dorian, P., Bubien, R., Lewis, S., Godejohn, D., Reynolds, M. R., et al. (2011). Development and validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 4(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.110.958033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson, J., Khan, M. A., Chen, G., Iezzi, A., & Maxwell, A. (2012). Population norms and Australian profile using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) 8D utility instrument. Centre for Health Economics Research Paper.

  20. Kaplan, R. M., Bush, J. W., & Berry, C. C. (1976). Health status: Types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Services Research, 11(4), 478.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fu, S.-N., Dao, M.-C., Wong, C.K.-H., & Yu, W.-C. (2019). SF-6D utility scores of smokers and ex-smokers with or without respiratory symptoms attending primary care clinics. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kortt, M. A., & Clarke, P. M. (2005). Estimating utility values for health states of overweight and obese individuals using the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2177–2185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McDonough, C. M., Grove, M. R., Tosteson, T. D., Lurie, J. D., Hilibrand, A. S., & Tosteson, A. N. A. (2005). Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants. Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1321–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-5743-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., & Day, N. A. (2001). A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson, J., Iezzi, A., & Khan, M. A. (2015). Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: the relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and ‘micro-utility’ effects. Quality of Life Research, 24(8), 2045–2053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0926-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman, R., Church, J., van den Berg, B., & Goodall, S. (2013). Australian health-related quality of life population norms derived from the SF-6D. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 37(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dobson, A. J., Hockey, R., Brown, W. J., Byles, J. E., Loxton, D. J., McLaughlin, D., et al. (2015). Cohort profile update: Australian longitudinal study on women’s health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(5), 1547–1547f. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Australian Consortium for Classification Development (2017). The International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, Teenth revision, Australian Mofification (ICD-10-AM), Australian Classification of Health Interventions (ACHI) and Asutralian Coding Standards (ACS) - ICD-10-AM-AM/ACHI/ACS. (Tenth Edition ed.): Independent Housing Pricing Authority.

  30. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology ATC/DDD Index. (2019). Retrieved 3 December 3, 2019, from https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/.

  31. Li, P., Stuart, E. A., & Allison, D. B. (2015). Multiple imputation: A flexible tool for handling missing data. JAMA, 314(18), 1966–1967. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 4–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanesarajah, J., Waller, M., Whitty, J. A., & Mishra, G. D. (2017). The relationship between SF-6D utility scores and lifestyle factors across three life stages: Evidence from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Quality of Life Research, 26(6), 1507–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hagens, V. E., Ranchor, A. V., Van Sonderen, E., Bosker, H. A., Kamp, O., Tijssen, J. G. P., et al. (2004). Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Das, A. K., Willcoxson, P. D., Corrado, O. J., & West, R. M. (2006). The impact of long-term warfarin on the quality of life of elderly people with atrial fibrillation. Age and Ageing, 36(1), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kooistra, H. A. M., Piersma-Wichers, M., Kluin-Nelemans, H. C., Veeger, N. J. G. M., & Meijer, K. (2016). Impact of vitamin K antagonists on quality of life in a prospective cohort of 807 atrial fibrillation patients. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 9(4), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). Rural & remote health. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dobson, A., McLaughlin, D., Vagenas, D., & Wong, K. Y. (2010). Why are death rates higher in rural areas? Evidence from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34(6), 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00623.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dobson, A., Byles, J., Dolja-Gore, X., Fitzgerald, D., Hockey, R., Loxton, D., et al. (2011). Rural, remote and regional differences in women's health: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Women's Health Australia

  40. Byles, J., Mishra, G., Hockey, R., Adane, A., Chan, H.-W., Dolja-Gore, X., et al. (2017). Use, access to, and impact of Medicare services for Australian women: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Women's Health Australia.

  41. Byles, J., Powers, J., Chojenta, C., & Warner-Smith, P. (2006). Older women in Australia: Ageing in urban, rural and remote environments. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 25(3), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2006.00171.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lucke, J., Russell, A., Tooth, L., Lee, C., Watson, M., Byrne, G., et al. (2008). Few urban–rural differences in older carers’ access to community services. Australian Health Review, 32(4), 684–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sabouret, P., Depret-Bixio, L., Cotte, F.-E., Marie, P., Bedira, N., & Blin, P. (2014). Sex differences in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in French primary care: Results of the AFIGP (Atrial Fibrillation In General Practice) Database. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 103(11), 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0726-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research on which this study is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health by the University of Queensland and the University of Newcastle. We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health for funding this research and to the women who provided the survey data. The authors acknowledge the assistance of the Data Linkage Unit at the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) for undertaking the data linkage to the National Death Index (NDI). The authors also acknowledge the following: (i) Centre for Health Record Linkage (CHeReL), NSW Ministry of Health for the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection and ACT Health for the ACT Admitted Patient Care Data Collection; (ii) Queensland Health, including the Statistical Services Branch for the Qld Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection; (iii) Department of Health Western Australia, including the Data Linkage Branch and the WA Hospital Morbidity Data Collection and (iv) SA NT Datalink and SA Health for the SA Public Hospital Separations Data Collection. The authors acknowledge the Department of Health and Medicare Australia for providing MBS and PBS data and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) as the integrating authority. The authors are also grateful to Professor Richard Norman for sharing the SF-6D algorithm with Australian population norms. The authors obtained a non-commercial academic license and permission to use the SF-6D algorithm for this study from the University of Sheffield.

Funding

This research received no specific grants from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The corresponding author is a PhD candidate and has received a “Higher Degree by Research” scholarship from the University of Newcastle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shazia S. Abbas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOCX 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, S.S., Majeed, T., Weaver, N. et al. Utility estimations of health states of older Australian women with atrial fibrillation using SF-6D. Qual Life Res 30, 1457–1466 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02748-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02748-3

Keywords

Navigation