Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individualized quality of life of severely affected multiple sclerosis patients: practicability and value in comparison with standard inventories

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Individualized quality of life (QoL) measures differ from traditional inventories in that QoL domains/weights are not predetermined, but identified by the individual. We assessed practicability of the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual QoL-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) interview in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients; the key QoL dimensions identified; and the correlation of the SEIQoL-DW index score with standard patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Participants were people with severe MS who performed the baseline visit of the PeNSAMI trial (ISRCTN73082124). The SEIQoL-DW was administered at the patient’s home by a trained examiner. Patients then received the following PROMs: the Core-Palliative care Outcome Scale (Core-POS), the Palliative care Outcome Scale-Symptoms-MS (POS-S-MS), the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions-3L (EQ-5D-3L), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Results

Of 59 enrolled patients, 11 (19 %) did not receive the SEIQoL-DW (and the other PROMs) because of severe cognitive compromise or inability to communicate. SEIQoL-DW administration was completed and deemed valid in all 48 cases (mean age 60 years, 58 % women, median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 8.5). Mean SEIQoL-DW index score was 59.1 (SD 25.5). The most commonly nominated SEIQoL-DW areas were family (94 % of the patients), relationships, and leisure activities (both 65 %). Core-POS and POS-S-MS contained 70 % of the SEIQoL-DW-nominated areas. Nevertheless, correlations between SEIQoL-DW index, Core-POS, and POS-S-MS (and the other PROMs) were negligible.

Conclusions

Individualized QoL can be assessed in severely affected MS patients, providing information that is not tracked by the standard inventories Core-POS, POS-S-MS, EQ-5D-3L, and HADS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conway, P. H., Mostashari, F., & Clancy, C. (2013). The future of quality measurement for improvement and accountability. The Journal of American Medical Association, 309(21), 2215–2216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(5), 559–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027–3034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Compston, A., & Coles, A. (2008). Multiple sclerosis. The Lancet, 372(9648), 1502–1517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giordano, A., Ferrari, G., Radice, D., Randi, G., Bisanti, L., Solari, A., & on behalf of the POSMOS study. (2013). Self-assessed health status changes in a community cohort of people with multiple sclerosis: 11 years of follow-up. European Journal of Neurology, 20(4), 681–688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruenewald, D. A., Higginson, I. J., Vivat, B., Edmonds, P., & Burman, R. E. (2004). Quality of life measures for the palliative care of people severely affected by multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Multiple Sclerosis, 10(6), 690–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leray, E., Vukusic, S., Debouverie, M., Clanet, M., Brochet, B., de Sèze, J., et al. (2015). Excess mortality in patients with multiple sclerosis starts at 20 years from clinical onset: Data from a Large-Scale French Observational Study. PLoS One, 10, e0132033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Solari, A., Giordano, A., Grasso, M. G., Confalonieri, P., Patti, F., Lugaresi, A., et al. (2015). Home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis and their carers: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16, 184. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0695-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hickey, A. M., Bury, G., O’Boyle, C. A., Bradley, F., O’Kelly, F. D., & Shannon, W. (1996). A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. British Medical Journal, 313(7048), 29–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H., Hickey, A., O’Malley, K., & Joyce, C. R. (1992). Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. The Lancet, 339(8801), 1088–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Veronese, S., Gallo, G., Valle, A., Cugno, C., Chiò, A., & Calvo, A. (2015). Specialist palliative care improves the quality of life in advanced neurodegenerative disorders: NE-PAL, a pilot randomised controlled study. BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, pii: bmjspcare-2014-000788. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000788.

  12. Murrell, R. C., Kenealy, P. M., Beaumont, J. G., & Lintern, T. C. (1999). Assessing quality of life in persons with severe neurological disability associated with multiple sclerosis: The psychometric evaluation of two quality of life measures. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4(4), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lintern, T. C., Beaumont, J. G., Kenealy, P. M., & Murrell, R. C. (2001). Quality of Life (QoL) in severely disabled multiple sclerosis patients: comparison of three QoL measures using multidimensional scaling. Quality of Life Research, 10(4), 371–378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sleeman, K. E., & Higginson, I. J. (2013). A psychometric validation of two brief measures to assess palliative need in patients severely affected by multiple sclerosis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 46(3), 406–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hearn, J., & Higginson, I. J. (1999). Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Palliative care core audit project advisory group. Quality in Health Care, 8(4), 219–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandnavica, 67(6), 361–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Costantini, M., Musso, M., Viterbori, P., Bonci, F., Del Mastro, L., Garrone, O., et al. (1999). Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: Validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Supportive Care in Cancer, 7(3), 121–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Borreani, C., Bianchi, E., Pietrolongo, E., Rossi, I., Cilia, S., Giuntoli, M., et al. (2014). Unmet needs of people with severe multiple sclerosis and their carers: Qualitative findings for a home-based intervention. PLoS One, 9, e109679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., et al. (2011). Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals of Neurology, 69(2), 292–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33, 1444–1452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prognostic Indicator Guidance (PIG). 2011. http://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/cd-content/uploads/files/General%20Files/Prognostic%20Indicator%20Guidance%20October%202011.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2016.

  24. O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H. M., Hickey, A., Joyce, C. R. B., Browne, J., et al. (1993). The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL). administration manual. Dublin: Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chiò, A., Gauthier, A., Montuschi, A., Calvo, A., Di, Vito, N., Ghiglione, P., et al. (2004). A cross sectional study on determinants of quality of life in ALS. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 75(11), 1597–1601.

  26. Lee, M. A., Walker, R. W., Hildreth, A. J., & Prentice, W. M. (2006). Individualized assessment of quality of life in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 21(11), 1929–1934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. LeVasseur, S. A., Green, S., & Talman, P. (2005). The SEIQoL-DW is a valid method for measuring individual quality of life in stroke survivors attending a secondary prevention clinic. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 779–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel, K. K., Veenstra, D. L., & Patrick, D. L. (2003). A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value in Health, 6(5), 595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ring, L., Lindblad, A. K., Bendtsen, P., Viklund, E., Jansson, R., & Glimelius, B. (2006). Feasibility and validity of a computer administered version of SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1173–1177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, H. J., Taylor, R., & Mitchell, A. (2000). A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI, and SEIQoL. Heart, 84, 390–394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wettergren, L., Kettis-Lindblad, A., Sprangers, M., & Ring, L. (2009). The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 18(6), 737–746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farquhar, M., Ewing, G., & Higginson, I. J. (2010). The experience of using the SEIQoL-DW with patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): issues of process and outcome. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 619–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tramonti, F., Gerini, A., & Stampacchia, G. (2014). Individualised and health-related quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 52, 231–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pollmann, W., Busch, C., & Voltz, R. (2005). Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Measures, relevance, problems, and perspectives. Nervenarzt, 76(2), 154–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Neudert, C., Wasner, M., & Borasio, G. D. (2004). Individual quality of life is not correlated with health-related quality of life or physical function in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 7(4), 551–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Levack, P., Grahama, J., & Kidd, J. (2004). Listen to the patient: quality of life of patients with recently diagnosed malignant cord compression in relation to their disability. Palliative Medicine, 18(7), 594–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tramonti, F., Bongioanni, P., Di Bernardo, C., Davitti, S., & Rossi, B. (2012). Quality of life of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Psychology Health and Medicine, 17(5), 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Strupp, J., Voltz, R., & Golla, H. (2016). Integrating a palliative care approach into the management of patients with severe multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 22(1), 13–18.

  42. Oliver, D. J., Borasio, G. D., Caraceni, A., de Visser, M., Grisold, W., Lorenzl, S., et al. (2016). A consensus review on the development of palliative care for patients with chronic and progressive neurological disease. European Journal of Neurology, 23(1), 30–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Becker, G., Merk, C. S., Meffert, C., & Momm, F. (2014). Measuring individual quality of life in patients receiving radiation therapy: the SEIQoL-Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2025–2030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sundberg, K., Lampic, C., Bjork, O., Arvidson, J., & Wettergren, L. (2009). Positive and negative consequences of childhood cancer influencing the lives of young adults. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 13(3), 164–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM) Grant Number 2014/S/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Solari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EP has received travel grants from Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. AL has been a Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, and Genzyme advisory board member. She received travel grants and honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva and her Institution received research grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, and Teva. PC has been a board member of Biogen and received travel grants from Sanofi, Biogen, and Merk Serono. FP has received speaking honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi. He has been a Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, and Novartis advisory board member. MGG has received research funding from Merck Serono and consulting and speaking fees from Biogen. AS has been a board member of Biogen Idec and Novartis, and has received speaker honoraria from Excemed, Genzyme, and Merck Serono. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

On behalf of the PeNSAMI project.

Please see the Appendix section for PeNSAMI project.

Appendix

Appendix

PeNSAMI project investigators.

Steering Committee: R Amadeo, A Giordano, M Ponzio, MG Grasso, A Lugaresi, F Patti, G Martino, L Palmisano, S Veronese, P Zaratin, MA Battaglia, A Solari.

Data Management and Analysis Committee: A Giordano, D Radice (statistician): Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan; M Ponzio (statistician), G Ferrari, A Solari.

Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: DJ Oliver: Wisdom Hospice, University of Kent, Rochester, Kent, UK; E Pucci: Neurology Unit, Ospedale Provinciale di Macerata, Macerata; L Tesio: Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan; The Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan.

Qualitative Analysis Panel: E Bianchi, E Pietrolongo, A Solari, A Giordano, I Rossi, S Cilia, M Giuntoli, C Borreani.

Literature Review Panel: MG Grasso, L Palmisano, A Fittipaldo, A Giordano.

Intervention Panel: C Cugno, R Causarano, P Morino: ‘Ex Convento delle Oblate’ Hospice, Local Health Unit of Florence, Florence, S Veronese.

Centers and Investigators: AISM Liguria Region Rehabilitation Service, Genoa: ML Lopes de Carvalho, M Giuntoli, R Motta, MA Battaglia; Antea Charitable Association, Rome: G Casale, MC Stefanelli; FARO Charitable Foundation, Turin: S Veronese, C Cugno; Foundation IRCCS Istituto Nazionale per la Cura dei Tumori, Milan: C Borreani, E Bianchi; Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C Besta, Milan: A Solari, P Confalonieri, AM Giovannetti, V Torri Clerici, E Rossetti, A Totis, A Campanella, A Giordano, F Martini, A Fittipaldo, G Ferrari, R Mantegazza; IRCCS S Lucia Foundation, Rome: MG Grasso, I Rossi, E Troisi, A Pompa, L Tucci, F Ippoliti, G Morone, A Fusco; Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome: L Palmisano; Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (AISM), Genoa: R Amadeo, G Martino; Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM), Genoa: P Zaratin, M Ponzio, MA Battaglia; Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, Milan: R Causarano, D Da Col, B Lissoni; G d’Annunzio University, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti: A Lugaresi, E Pietrolongo, M Onofrj; University Hospital Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Catania: F Patti, S Cilia, C Leone, V Cascio, V Cimino, G Occhipinti, A Pappalardo, C Cavallaro, F Zagari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giovannetti, A.M., Pietrolongo, E., Giordano, A. et al. Individualized quality of life of severely affected multiple sclerosis patients: practicability and value in comparison with standard inventories. Qual Life Res 25, 2755–2763 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1303-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1303-9

Keywords

Navigation