Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to assess influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on improvement of orofacial esthetics, chewing function (CF) and oral health-related quality of life.

Methods

Patients treated with 70 conventional complete dentures (CDs), 38 implant-supported mandibular complete dentures opposed to maxillary CDs, 56 conventional removable partial dentures, 15 implant-supported removable partial dentures, 25 conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and 59 implant-supported fixed partial dentures (IFPDs) were included. The survey was conducted using the three questionnaires: the OHIP-CRO14, the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-CRO) and the Chewing Function Questionnaire (CFQ), and administrated twice: at the baseline prior the therapy and 3 months after prosthodontic rehabilitation had been finished.

Results

The after-treatment scores were significantly better than the baseline scores (p < 0.001) for the OES, OHIP14 and CF questionnaires in all types of treatments. The two-factor ANOVA showed no significant difference for the OES after-treatment scores between different rehabilitation options and implant presence, but the OHIP14 and CFQ after-treatment scores were significantly better in FPD and IFPDs than in removable implant and conventional denture wearers. The score change was significantly higher in all implant removable denture patients for the OES, OHIP and CFQ. The lowest score change was registered in the FPD wearers. (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Removable denture implant patients most benefited from implant support, but IFPD and FPD had the best after-treatment scores. The assessed clinical parameters may help dentists in choice of the best rehabilitation option with the highest treatment effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brennan, D. S., Spencer, A. J., & Roberts-Thomson, K. F. (2008). Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 17, 227–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Inukai, M., John, M. T., Igarashi, Y., & Baba, K. (2010). Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 118.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Montero, J., López, J. F., Galindo, M. P., Vicente, P., & Bravo, M. (2009). Impact of prosthodontic status on oral wellbeing: A cross-sectional cohort study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 36, 592–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spalj, S., Lajnert, V., & Ivankovic, L. (2014). The psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire—translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1267–1271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshizumi, D. T. (1964). An evaluation of factors pertinent to the success of complete denture service. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 14, 866–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zlatarić, D. K., & Celebić, A. (2008). Factors related to patients’ general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: A stepwise multiple regression analysis. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 21, 86–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlsson, G. E. (1998). Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 79, 17–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Čelebić, A., Knezović-Zlatarić, D., Papić, M., Carek, V., Baucić, I., & Stipetić, J. (2003). Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(10), M948–M953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen, P. F., & McMillan, A. S. (2003). A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14, 173–179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Assunção, W. G., Barão, V. A., Delben, J. A., Gomes, E. A., & Tabata, L. F. (2009). A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: A literature review. Gerodontology, 27, 154–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strassburger, C., Kerchbaum, T., & Heydecke, G. (2006). Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 19, 339–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cordaro, L., di Torresanto, V. M., Petricevic, N., Jornet, P. R., & Torsello, F. (2013). Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 536–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Persic, S., Palac, A., Vojvodic, D., & Celebic, A. (2014). Initial effects of a treatment by fixed partial dentures supported by mini dental implants from a patient’s point of view. Collegium Antropologicum, 38(1), 275–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naert, I., Alsaadi, G., & Quirynen, M. (2004). Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 10-year randomized clinical study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17, 401–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fueki, K., Kimoto, K., Ogawa, T., & Garrett, N. R. (2007). Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98, 470–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, S. J., Chen, P., & Zhu, G. X. (2013). Relationship between implantation of missing anterior teeth and oral health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1613–1620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh, B. P., Pradhan, K. N., Tripathi, A., Tua, R., & Tripathi, S. (2012). Effect of sociodemographic variables on complete denture satisfaction. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 4, 43–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, I. C., Yang, Y. H., Ho, P. S., & Lee, I. C. (2012). Exploring the quality of life after denture-wearing within elders in Kaohsiung. Gerodontology, 29, e1067–e1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Slade, G. D., & Spencer, A. J. (1994). Development and the evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dental Health, 11, 3–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. John, M. T. (2007). Exploring dimensions of oral health-related quality of life using experts-opinions. Quality of Life Research, 16, 697–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zlataric, D. K., & Celebic, A. (2001). Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: A comparison between patient and prosthodontist assessments. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 14, 423–426.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. John, M. T., Reißmann, D. R., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., et al. (2014). Factor analyses of the Oral Health Impact Profile—overview and studied population. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 58(1), 26–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. John, M. T., Reissmann, D. R., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., et al. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. doi:10.1111/joor.12192.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John, M. T., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., Celebić, A., et al. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. doi:10.1111/joor.12191.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bimbashi, V., Celebić, A., Islami, A., Asllani-Hoxha, F., & Petricević, N. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Albanian language version of the OHIP-ALB49 Questionnaire in the Republic of Kosovo. Collegium Antropologicum, 36, 1189–1195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rener-Sitar, K., Celebić, A., Petricević, N., Papić, M., Sapundzhiev, D., Kansky, A., et al. (2009). The Slovenian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (OHIP-SVN): Translation and psychometric properties. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 1177–1183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peršić, S., Milardović, S., Mehulić, K., & Čelebić, A. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(6), 523–533.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larsson, P., John, M. T., Nilner, K., Bondemark, L., & List, T. (2010). Development of an Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 23, 249–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peršić, S., Palac, A., Bunjevac, T., & Čelebić, A. (2013). Development of a new chewing function questionnaire for assessment of a self-perceived chewing function. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 41(6), 565–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsu, K. J., Lee, H. E., Wu, Y. M., La, S. J., Huang, S. T., & Yen, Y. Y. (2014). Masticatory factors as predictors of oral health-related quality of life among elderly people in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1395–1405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, P., & Yu, S. (2012). Zhu. The psychosocial impacts of implantation on the dental aesthetics of missing anterior teeth patients. British Dental Journal, 213(11), E20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Knezović Zlatarić, D., Celebić, A., Valentić-Peruzović, M., Jerolimov, V., & Pandurić, J. (2003). A survey of treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30(8), 847–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Petričević, N., Čelebić, A., Papić, M., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2009). The Croatian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 841–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rener-Sitar, K., Petricević, N., Celebić, A., & Marion, L. (2008). Psychometric properties of Croatian and Slovenian short form of oral health impact profile questionnaires. Croatian Medical Journal, 49, 536–544.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Reissmann, D. R., Sierwald, I., Heydecke, G., & John, M. T. (2013). Interpreting one oral health impact profile point. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Celebic, A., & Knezović-Zlataric, D. (2003). A comparison of patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. Journal of Dentistry, 31, 445–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kovac, Z., Troskot, Z., Uhac, I., Cabov, T., Lajnert, V., Pavicić, D. K., et al. (2012). Multivariate analysis of different factors affecting the patient general satisfaction with complete dentures. Collegium Antropologicum, 36, 791–794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bellini, D., Dos Santos, M. B., De Paula Prisco Da Cunha, V., & Marchini, L. J. (2009). Patients’ expectations and satisfaction of complete denture therapy and correlation with locus of control. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 36, 682–686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Locker, D., Clarke, M., & Payne, B. (2000). Self-perceived oral health status, psychological well-being and life satisfaction in an older adult population. Journal of Dental Research, 79, 970–975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kovacic, I., Badrov, J., Vidovic, N., & Celebic, A. (2011). Preliminary clinical report of satisfaction with prosthodontic rehabilitation of intellectually disabled young adults provided by parents or caregivers. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(4), 303–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Petricevic, N., Celebic, A., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2012). A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology, 29(2), e956–e963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Swelem, A. A., Gurevich, K. G., Fabrikant, E. G., Hassan, M. H., & Aqou, S. (2014). Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients treated with removable, fixed, fixed-removable, and implant-supported prostheses. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27, 338–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fillion, M., Aubazac, D., Bessadet, M., Allègre, M., & Nicolas, E. (2013). The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice: A prospective cohort study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wolfart, S., Moll, D., Hilgers, R. D., Wolfart, M., & Kern, M. (2013). Implant placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on oral health-related quality of life. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 1354–1359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Duvernay, E., Srinivasan, M., Legrand, L. D., Herrmann, F. R., von Steinbüchel, N., & Müller, F. (2014). Dental appearance and personality trait judgment of elderly persons. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27, 348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kranjcic, J., Mikus, A., Mehulic, K., & Vojvodic, D. (2014). Knowledge and awareness of dental implants among elderly people in Croatia. Journal of Prosthodontics. doi:10.1111/jopr.12172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

To the Ministry of Science of Croatia for funding the University Research Project: “Contemporary prosthodontic procedures, materials and OHRQoL dependent on a degree of oral rehabilitation.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanja Peršić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peršić, S., Čelebić, A. Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res 24, 919–926 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0817-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0817-2

Keywords

Navigation