Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring dimensions of oral health-related quality of life using experts–opinions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is expected to be multidimensional. However, it is unknown what these dimensions are. This study aimed to explore the dimensional structure of OHRQoL using experts–opinions. A conceptual model of oral health with seven dimensions (functional limitation; physical pain; psychological discomfort; physical, psychological, social disability; handicap) was provided to 14 health care professionals. They assigned each of 49 items of an OHRQoL questionnaire, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), to the seven model dimensions. All 49 items could be assigned to one or more dimensions of OHRQoL. All seven dimensions of the conceptual model of oral health were identified: Functional limitation appeared 14 times, physical pain eight times, psychological discomfort 12 times, physical disability once, psychological disability four times, social disability nine times, and handicap once. This supported a seven-dimensional model of OHRQoL. However, when items were grouped into clusters with unique content, a smaller model appeared with the dimensions oral functions, orofacial pain, psychological impact, and social impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert, G. H., Duncan, R. P., Heft, M. W., Dolan, T. A., & Vogel, W. B. (1998). Multidimensionality of oral health in dentate adults. Medical Care, 36, 988–001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Locker, D. (1988). Measuring oral health: A conceptual framework. Community Dental Health, 5, 3–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slade, G. D., & Spencer, A. J. (1994). Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dental Health, 11, 3–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong, M. C., Lo, E. C., & McMillan, A. S. (2002). Validation of a Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 30, 423–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson, P., List, T., Lundstrom, I., Marcusson, A., & Ohrbach, R. (2004). Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-S). Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 62, 147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. John, M. T., Patrick, D. L., & Slade, G. D. (2002). The German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile–translation and psychometric properties. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 110, 425–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szentpetery, A., Szabo, G., Marada, G., Szanto, I., & John, M. T. (2006). The Hungarian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 114, 197–03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John, M. T., Hujoel, P., Miglioretti, D. L., Leresche, L., Koepsell, T. D., & Micheelis, W. (2004). Dimensions of oral-health-related quality of life. Journal of Dental Research, 83, 956–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Norman, G. F., & Streiner, D. L. (2000). Biostatistics–the bare essentials (2nd edn.). Hamilton: B.C. Decker.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ware, J. E. Jr. (1995). The status of health assessment 1994. Annual Review of Public Health, 16, 327–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller, S. D., Ware, J. E. Jr., Bentler, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., & Apolone, G., et al. (1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cushing, A. M., Sheiham, A., & Maizels, J. (1986) Developing socio-dental indicators–the social impact of dental disease. Community Dental Health, 3, 3–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leao, A., & Sheiham, A. (1996). The development of a socio-dental measure of dental impacts on daily living. Community Dental Health, 13, 22–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strauss, R. P., & Hunt, R. J. (1993). Understanding the value of teeth to older adults: Influences on the quality of life. Journal of the American Dental Association, 124, 105–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gift, H. C., Atchison, K. A., & Dayton, C. M. (1997). Conceptualizing oral health and oral health-related quality of life. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 601–08.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tapsoba, H., Deschamps, J. P., & Leclercq, M. H. (2000). Factor analytic study of two questionnaires measuring oral health-related quality of life among children and adults in New Zealand, Germany and Poland. Quality of Life Research, 9, 559–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nuttall, N. M., Slade, G. D., Sanders, A. E., Steele, J. G., Allen, P. F., & Lahti, S. (2006). An empirically derived population-response model of the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 34, 18–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atchison, K. A., & Dolan, T. A. (1990). Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. Journal of Dental Education, 54, 680–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McGrath, C., & Bedi, R. (2001). An evaluation of a new measure of oral health related quality of life–OHQoL-UK(W). Community Dental Health, 18, 138–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bagewitz, I. C., Soderfeldt, B., Nilner, K., & Palmqvist, S. (2005). Dimensions of oral health-related quality of life in an adult Swedish population. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 63, 353–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  23. Locker, D. (1996). Applications of self-reported assessments of oral health outcomes. Journal of Dental Education, 60, 494–00

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs. Buchmann, Dette, Heinrich, Müller, Rösel, Setz, Szentpétery, Töpel, Zwijnenburg (all currently or previously working in the Department of Prosthodontics, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany) and Drs. Dauer, Liedtke, Rosendahl, and Selle (all currently or previously working in the Institute of Medical Psychology, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany) for their participation in the study. We are grateful to Dr. Sobotta, University of Leipzig, for his comments to an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike T. John.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, M.T. Exploring dimensions of oral health-related quality of life using experts–opinions. Qual Life Res 16, 697–704 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9150-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9150-8

Keywords

Navigation