Abstract
Attitude change is frequently measured by comparing respondents’ scores on the same instrument at different points in time. However, there is a variety of methodological challenges in measuring attitude change: when respondents’ handling of the questionnaire or their understanding of the items change, the comparability of constructs is threatened. This paper proposes the investigation of systematic methodological variation over time by multiple correspondence analysis. Visualizing respondents’ ‘cognitive maps’ facilitates the exploration of both changes in the underlying structure of attitude constructs—that is, changes in meaning—as well as data quality. The approach is illustrated with the analysis of two item batteries on gender role attitude from the BHPS and the BSA from the beginning of the 1990s to the mid-2000s. Both data sets exhibit similar structural changes - more methodological variation and increasing complexity of the attitude construct. The comparison of latent structures over time provides useful information about the nature of change in social constructs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
MCA also provides a numerical solution, which is not shown here as the essential information is conveyed by the respective figures.
This additional axis is not obtained through statistical rotation; it is just a visual aid to interpretation.
The MCA maps of the waves in between are not shown here, but yielded similar results that confirm the hypothesis of a development towards the predominance of method-induced variance. It has to be kept in mind that we are looking at the same respondents at the three time points shown here, so that the change cannot be attributed to sampling variance.
References
Alwin, D.F., Scott, J.: Attitude change: its measurement and interpretation using longitudinal surveys. In: Taylor, B., Thomson, K. (eds.) Understanding Change in Social Attitudes, pp. 75–106. Aldershot, Dartmouth (1996)
Andrews, F.M., Herzog, R.A.: The quality of survey data as related to age of respondent. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(394), 403–410 (1986)
Bardi, A., Goodwin, R.: The dual route to value change: individual processes and cultural moderators. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42(2), 271–287 (2011)
Behr, D., Braun, M., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W.: Testing the validity of gender ideology items by implementing probing questions in web surveys. Field Methods 25(2), 124–141 (2012)
Berrington, A., Hu, Y., Smith, P.W.F., Sturgis, P.: A graphical chain model for reciprocal relationships between women’s gender role attitudes and labour force participation. J. R. Stat. Soc. 171, 89–108 (2008)
Billiet, J.: Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equation modeling. In: Harkness, J.A., Van de Vijver, F.J.R., Mohler, P. (eds.) Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, pp. 247–265. Wiley, New York (2003)
Blasius, J., Greenacre, M. (eds.): Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Chapman & Hall, London (2006)
Blasius, J., Thiessen, V.: Assessing data quality and construct comparability in cross-national surveys. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 22(3), 229–242 (2006)
Blasius, J., Thiessen, V.: Assessing the Quality of Survey Data. Sage, London (2012)
Braun, M.: Using egalitarian items to measure men’s and women’s family roles. Sex Roles 59, 644–656 (2008)
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., Muthén, B.: Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychol. Bull. 105, 456–466 (1989)
Cantor, D.: A review and summary of studies on panel conditioning. In: Menard, S. (ed.) Handbook of Longitudinal Research, pp. 123–138. Elsevier/Academic Press, Burlington (2008)
Chan, D.: The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: an integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organ. Res. Methods 1(4), 412–483 (1998)
Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., Lyonette, C.: Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: a cross-national analysis in two waves. Work Employ. Soc. 19(2), 213–233 (2005)
Curtin, R., Presser, S., Singer, E.: Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin. Q. 69(1), 87–98 (2005)
Davidov, E.: A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European social survey. Surv. Res. Methods 2(1), 33–46 (2008)
Davidov, E.: Nationalism and constructive patriotism: a longitudinal test of comparability in 22 countries with the ISSP. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 23(1), 88–103 (2011)
Fernández, E.A., de Rada Igúzquiza, V.D., Lautre, I.G., Calvo, M.I.L.: Face to face and telephone surveys in terms of sampling representativeness: a multidimensional analysis. Qual. Quant. 46, 303–313 (2012)
Frick, J.R., Goebel, J., Schechtman, E., Wagner, G., Yitzhaki, S.: Using analysis of Gini (ANoGi) for detecting whether two sub-samples represent the same universe: the SOEP experience. Sociol. Methods Res. 34(4), 427–468 (2006)
Golembiewski, R.T., Billingsley, K., Yeager, S.: Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: types of change generated by OD designs. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 12, 133–157 (1976)
Greenacre, M.J.: Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. Academic Press, London (1984)
Greenacre, M.J.: From simple to multiple correspondence analysis. In: Blasius, J., Greenacre, M.J. (eds.) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods, pp. 41–76. Chapman & Hall, London (2006)
Groves, R.M.: Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin. Q. 70(5), 646–675 (2006)
Horn, J.L., McArdle, J.J.: A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Exp. Aging Res. 18(3), 117–144 (1992)
Kaminska, O., McCutcheon, A.L., Billiet, J.: Satisficing among reluctant respondents in a cross-national context. Public Opin. Q. 74(5), 956–984 (2010)
Kan, M.Y.: Work orientation and wives’ employment careers. Work Occup. 34(4), 430–462 (2007)
Kim, J., Gershenson, C., Glaser, P., Smith, T.W.: The polls—trends in surveys on surveys. Public Opin. Q. 75(1), 165–191 (2011)
Konig, R.P.: Changing social categories in a changing society: studying trends with correspondence analysis. Qual. Quant. 44, 409–425 (2010)
Krosnick, J.A.: Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 5(3), 213–236 (1991)
Krosnick, J.A., Narayan, S., Smith, W.R.: Satisficing in surveys: initial evidence. New Dir. Eval. 1996(70), 29–44 (1996)
Le Roux, B., Rouanet, H.: Geometric Data Analysis—From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Loosveldt, G., Storms, V.: Measuring public opinions about surveys. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 20(1), 74–89 (2008)
Lugtig, P., Boeije, H.R., Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M.: Change? What change? An exploration of the use of mixed-methods research to understand longitudinal measurement variance. Methodology 8(3), 115–123 (2012)
Maurer, T.J., Raju, N.S., Collins, W.C.: Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. J. Appl. Psychol. 83(5), 693–702 (1998)
Meade, A.W., Lautenschlager, G.J.J., Hecht, J.E.: Establishing measurement equivalence and invariance in longitudinal data with item response theory. Int. J. Test. 5(3), 279–300 (2005)
Meuleman, B., Davidov, E., Billiet, J.: Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: a dynamic group conflict theory approach. Soc. Sci. Res. 38(2), 352–365 (2009)
Meurs, H., van Wissen, L., Visser, J.: Measurement biases in panel data. Transportation 16, 175–194 (1989)
Mickelson, K.D., Claffey, S.T., Williams, S.L.: The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles 55, 73–82 (2006)
Millsap, R.E., Hartog, S.B.: Alpha, beta, and gamma change in evaluation research: a structural equation approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 73(3), 574–584 (1988)
Millsap, R.E.: Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge, New York (2011)
Poznyak, D., Meuleman, B., Abts, K., Bishop, G.F.: Trust in American government: longitudinal measurement equivalence in the ANES, 1964–2008. Soc. Indic. Res. 118(2), 741–758 (2014)
Read, S., Grundy, E.: Mental health among older married couples: the role of gender and family life. J. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 46(4), 331–341 (2011)
Riordan, C.M., Richardson, H.A., Schaffer, B.S., Vandenberg, R.J.: Alpha, beta and gamma change—a review of past research with recommendations for new directions. In: Schriesheim, C., Neider, L.L. (eds.) Equivalence in Measurement, pp. 51–97. IAP, Charlotte (2001)
Saris, W.E., Gallhofer, I.N.: Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research. John Wiley & Sons, Chapel Hill (2007)
Schmitt, N., Kuljanin, G.: Measurement invariance: review of practice and implications. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 18, 210–222 (2008)
Schoonees, P. C., van de Velden, M. C., Groenen, P. J. F.: Constrained dual scaling for detecting response styles in categorical data. Psychometrika (in press)
Smith, T.W.: Refining the total survey error perspective. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 23(4), 464–484 (2011)
Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., Baumgartner, H.: Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 25(1), 78–107 (1998)
Sturgis, P., Allum, N., Brunton-Smith, I.: Attitudes over time—the psychology of panel conditioning. In: Lynn, P. (ed.) Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, pp. 113–126. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2009)
Sweeting, H., Bhaskar, A., Benzeval, M., Popham, F., Hunt, K.: Changing gender roles and their implications for well-being around the new millennium. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 49, 791–809 (2014)
Toepoel, V., Das, M., van Soest, A.: Effects of design in web surveys: comparing trained and fresh respondents. Public Opin. Q. 72(5), 985–1007 (2009)
Vandenberg, R.J.: Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organ. Res. Methods 5, 139–158 (2002)
Vandenberg, R.J., Lance, C.E.: A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 3(1), 4–70 (2000)
Van De Vijver, F.J.R.: Cultural and gender differences in gender-role beliefs, sharing household task and child-care responsibilities, and well-being among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. Sex Roles 57(11–12), 813–824 (2007)
Voas, D.: Towards a sociology of attitudes. Sociol. Res. Online (2014). doi:10.5153/sro.3289
Warren, J.R., Halpern-Manners, A.: Panel conditioning in longitudinal social science surveys. Sociol. Methods Res. 41(4), 491–534 (2012)
Waterton, J., Lievesley, D.: Evidence of conditioning effects in the british social attitudes panel. In: Duncan, G., Kalton, G., Kasprzyk, D., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Panel Surveys, pp. 318–339. Wiley, New York (1989)
Weijters, B., Geuens, M., Schillewaert, N.: The stability of individual response styles. Psychol. Methods 15(1), 96–110 (2010)
Yan, T., Eckman, S.: Panel conditioning: change in true value versus change in self-report. In: Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section, American Statistical Association, Alexandria (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barth, A. The changing nature of attitude constructs: an application of multiple correspondence analysis on gender role attitudes. Qual Quant 50, 1507–1523 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0218-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0218-9