Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Moderating Role of Gender and Gender Role Attitudes on the Link Between Spousal Support and Marital Quality

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers who examine the relation of gender role attitudes to division of household labor and marital quality often overlook its relation to emotional spousal support. Moreover, research on gender and marriage often ignores how gender role attitudes may explain the link between spousal support and marital quality. Secondary data analyses on a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults examined the interaction of gender and gender role attitudes on spousal support and marital quality. Emotional spousal support predicted better marital satisfaction and less conflict for traditional women and egalitarian men, whereas both instrumental and emotional spousal support predicted better marital satisfaction for egalitarian women and traditional men. These results suggest that within, as well as between, gender differences are important for understanding the contribution of spousal support to perceived marital quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acitelli, L. K. (1996). The neglected links between marital support and marital satisfaction. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 83–103). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acitelli, L. K., & Antonucci, T. C. (1994). Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 688–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60, 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 486–526). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, S. J., Blanton, P. W., & Gilliard, J. L. (2005). Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage and Family Review, 37, 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belle, D. (1987). Gender differences in the social moderators of stress. In R. C. Barnett, L. Biener, & G. K. Baruch (Eds.), Gender and stress (pp. 257–277). New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisure, K. R., & Allen, K. R. (1995). Feminists and the ideology and practice of marital equality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D. R., Weeks, M. O., & Morris, J. E. (2000). Changing marriage role expectations: 1961–1996. Sex Roles, 42, 933–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. L., & Orthner, D. K. (1983). Sex-role congruency and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., Kluwer, E. S., Schuurman, M. K., & Siero, F. W. (2000). The division of labor among egalitarian and traditional women: Differences in discontent, social comparison, and false consensus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 759–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K., Chassin, L. A., & Zeiss, A. (1985). The relation of sex-role self-concept and sex-role attitudes to the marital satisfaction and personal adjustment of dual-worker couples with preschool children. Sex Roles, 12, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1260–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 888–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, P., & Marini, M. M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29, 258–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. K., Salgado, D. M., Suvak, M. K., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (2004). Associations of gender and gender role ideology with behavioral and attitudinal features of intimate partner aggression. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R. (1973). Sex, marital status, and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, N. K., & Clark, M. S. (2001). Perceiving unfairness in the family: Cause or consequence of marital distress? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 281–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackel, L. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1992). Changes in the marital relationship after the first baby is born: Predicting the impact of expectancy disconfirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 944–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Gibson, R. H. (1982). Sex-role attitudes: 1972–1980. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 656–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husaini, B. A., Neff, J. A., Newbrough, J. R., & Moore, M. C. (1982). The stress-buffering role of social support and personal competence among the rural married. Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Geis, G. (1993). In what ways do gender-related attributes and beliefs affect marriage? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., et al. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1985). Sex-role egalitarianism: Biographical and personality correlates. Psychological Reports, 57, 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren, P., Carlton, K., & Shaw, D. (1980). Marital conflict: Relations among behaviors, outcomes, and distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 460–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, L. (2004). Predicting gender role ideology among husbands and wives in Israel: A comparative analysis. Sex Roles, 51, 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex roles: Traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. T., & Caldwell, R. A. (1987). Magnitude and directional effects of marital sex-role incongruence on marital adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 8, 97–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lye, D. N., & Biblarz, T. J. (1993). The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 157–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonagle, K. A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1992). The frequency and determinants of marital disagreements in a community sample. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 507–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, N. M. (1997). The relationship between wives’ estimates of time spent doing housework, support, and wives’ well-being. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1970). Introduction to Psychological Measurement (pp. 262–264). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasley, K., Kerpelman, J., & Guilbert, D. E. (2001). Gendered conflict, identity disruption, and marital instability: Expanding Gottman’s model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., & Crouter, A. C. (1990). Men’s provider-role attitudes: Implications for household work and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 136–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1985). Working wives/working husbands. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, K., & Coltrane, S. (1996). Entitlement, obligation, and gratitude in family work. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65, 816–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 1, 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L., & Gager, C. T. (2000). Hard living, perceived entitlement to a great marriage, and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 708–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, T., Kessler, R. C., & Aseltine, R. H., Jr. (1990). Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 423–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1986). Stress, coping, and social support in women. Behavior Therapist, 9, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1992). National Health Interview Survey, 1989 (Computer file). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanfossen, B. E. (1981). Sex differences in the mental health effects of spouse support and equity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 130–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinokur, A. D., & Vinokur-Kaplan, D. (1990). “In sickness and in health”: Patterns of social support and undermining in older married couples. Journal of Aging and Health, 2, 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P., & Donnelly, B. W. (1999). The intersection of time in activities and perceived unfairness in relation to psychological distress and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 739–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. (1988). Gender, marriage, and psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 452–468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Nancy Grote for her comments on an earlier draft, and Heidi Bissell for her assistance on preliminary analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin D. Mickelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mickelson, K.D., Claffey, S.T. & Williams, S.L. The Moderating Role of Gender and Gender Role Attitudes on the Link Between Spousal Support and Marital Quality. Sex Roles 55, 73–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9061-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9061-8

Keywords

Navigation