Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acquiring and developing theoretical sensitivity through undertaking a grounded preliminary literature review

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we propose that researchers can undertake a grounded preliminary literature review (GPLR) to acquire and develop their theoretical sensitivity as soon as possible in order to progress their research to the theory development stage. We utilize principles and philosophies within the grounded theory method as it is known for its ability to develop rigorous theory through the application of systematic procedures. A GPLR helps the researcher to build up a repertoire of theoretical codes for use in the later stages of a grounded research based study. Unlike the traditional literature review, the GPLR does not extend to covering the substantive topic area of research. By conducting a GPLR, researchers (in particular graduate students) can both satisfy mandatory university requirements to conduct a substantial literature review prior to beginning formal research and also meet generally accepted standards in the grounded theory method to delay reading in the substantive topic area until after the core category emerges from the data analysis. The article advocates and demonstrates a seven step method for developing a GPLR. A case is also made for the use of computer aided analytical tools. Further benefits, implications and areas of future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper we substantially expand on an earlier paper (authors withheld for review, 2009) with an explicit step-by-step process illustrated with genuine research data.

References

  • Beekhuyzen, J.: Putting the pieces of the puzzle together: using Nvivo for a literature review. 4th QUALIT conference—qualitative research in IT & IT in qualitative research. Wellington, New Zealand (2007)

  • Beekhuyzen, J., Cabraal, A., Singh, S., von Hellens, L.: Confessions of a virtual team. In: Proceedings of QualIT2006: Quality and Impact of Qualitative Research, pp 20–28. Griffith University, Brisbane (2006)

  • Bhattacharyya, S., Bhattacharyya, K.: If you build it they will come: creating a field for project based approach in learning science through qualitative inquiry and technology integration. In: Proceedings of QualIT2004: The Way Forward. Griffith University. Brisbane, Australia (2004)

  • Brown, S.B., Duguid, P.: Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2), 198–213 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: Secondhand brokerage: evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 119–148 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, M.M., Ward, J.M.: Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 127–141 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P.R.: A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4), 442–455 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P.R.: Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5), 555–568 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P.R., Rebentisch, E.S.: Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle. Manag. Sci. 49(9), 1180–1195 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K.: Shifting the grounds: constructivist grounded theory methods. In: Morse, J.M., Stern, P.N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A.E. (eds.) Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, pp. 127–154. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: Entering the field of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 1–17. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • di Gregorio, S.: Using Nvivo for your literature review. In Strategies in Qualitative Research: Issues and Results from Analysis Using QSR Nvivo and Nud*ist. Institute of Education, London (2000)

  • Fernandez, W.D.: Metateams in major information technology projects: a grounded theory of conflict, trust, communication and cost. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane (2003)

  • Gearing, R.E.: Bracketing in research: a typology. Qual. Heal. Res. 14(10), 1429–1452 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. The Sociology Press, Mills Valley (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G.: Emerging vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G.: Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA (1998)

  • Glaser, B.G.: The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA (2001)

  • Glaser, B.G.: The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA (2001)

  • Glaser, B.: The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G.: Doing Formal Grounded Theory: A Proposal. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., Holton, J.A.: Remodelling grounded theory. Grounded Theory Rev. 4(1), 1–24 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., Gerson, E.M.: The social dynamics of technical innovation in the computing world. Symb. Interact. 1(1), 132–146 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F.H.: Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx/ Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D.: New Strategies in Social Research: An Introduction and Guide. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, L.B.: Asking questions of the data: memo writing in grounded theory tradition. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 245–265. Sage, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVasseur, L.J.: The problem of bracketing in phenomenology. Qual. Heal. Res. 13(3), 408–420 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., Vaast, E.: The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q. 29(2), 335–363 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.Y., Turner, B.A.: Grounded theory and organizational research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 22(2), 141–157 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, V.B.: The relationship between and emerging grounded theory and the existing literature: four phases for consideration. Grounded Theory Rev. 5(2/3), 47–50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallin, A.: Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study. Contemp. Nurse 15(1–2), 61–69 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, G., Marland, G.R., Atkinson, J.: Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity. J. Adv. Nurs. 60(3), 334–342 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Nicholas, S.: Knowledge creation through boundary-spanning. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 4(4), 310–318 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M.: Tussles, Tensions, and resolutions. In: Morse, J.M., Stern, P.N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A.E. (eds.) Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, pp. 13–21. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, B., Olbrich, S.: Developing theories in information systems research: the grounded theory method applied. Inf. Syst. Theory Integr. Ser. Inf. Syst. 22, 323–347 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, A.L., Kalsih, Y., Yair, G.: Reflections on “brokerage and closure”. Soc. Netw. 29(2), 330–339 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patashnick, J., Rich, M.: Researching human experience: video intervention/prevention assessment. Aust. J. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 103–111 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pergert, P.: Leaving rules that enforce preconception. Grounded Theory Rev. 13(1), (2014)

  • Schindehutte, M., Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F.: Triggering events, corporate entrepreneurship and the marketing function. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 8(2), 18–30 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A.: The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldén, L.: On grounded theory—with some malice. J. Doc. 61(1), 114–129 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, J., Kan, M.: Grounded theory and NVivo: wars and wins. International conference on qualitative research in IT & IT. Brisbane, (2004)

  • Stern, P.N.: Eroding grounded theory. In: Morse, J.M. (ed.) Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, pp. 210–213. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P.N.: Glaserian grounded theory. In: Morse, J.M., Stern, P.N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A.E. (eds.) Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, pp. 114–126. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.: Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Sage, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistoll, A., Pauleen, D., Hooper, V.: Using NVivo to conduct a grounded literature review: an application in innovation and entrepreneurship research. 4th European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation. The University of Antwerp, Belgium (2009)

  • Tushman, M.L.: Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Adm. Sci. Q. 22(4), 587–605 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, C.: An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues. In: Trauth, E.M. (ed.) Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, pp. 104–110. Idea Group, Hershey (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, C.: The evolving nature of grounded theory method: the case of the information system discipline. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Sage, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, C., Fernandez, W.: Grounded Theory Method: The Researcher as Blank Slate and Other Myths. ICIS 2006 Proceedings. Paper 31, (2006)

  • Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., Meyers, M.: Putting the ’theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 20(4), 357–381 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfswinkel, J.F., Furtmueller, E., Wildeerom, C.P.M.: Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 45–55 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Open Polytechnic, Waterloo, New Zealand

    Tony Thistoll

  2. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Val Hooper

  3. Massey Unviersity, Auckland, New Zealand

    David J. Pauleen

Authors
  1. Tony Thistoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Val Hooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David J. Pauleen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Pauleen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thistoll, T., Hooper, V. & Pauleen, D.J. Acquiring and developing theoretical sensitivity through undertaking a grounded preliminary literature review. Qual Quant 50, 619–636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0167-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0167-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation