Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretation-Driven Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Grounded Theory Research: A Constructivist-Social Justice Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

This chapter is meant as guidance for not only investigators designing qualitative research projects but for reviewers assessing manuscripts using qualitative methods. An interpretation-driven approach to design and review of qualitative research is proposed as an alternative to the approach of setting in stone rules that consist of procedure-driven prescriptions. It walks the reader through the process of considering the design of an individual study and its coherence with the epistemology of the researcher(s). This approach emphasizes the centrality of the role of interpretation that is best evaluated in relation to an epistemology, within the context of the specific study characteristics, and in service of the scientific, practice, and/or social justice goals at hand. It presents context-sensitive guidelines for researchers and reviewers to use in designing and evaluating qualitative research studies. Within the chapter, there is a specific focus on grounded theory (e.g., Glaser and Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago, 1967); however, many of the principles put forward to guide study design and research review may be relevant across qualitative methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angus L, Levitt H, Hardtke K (1999) The narrative processes coding system: research applications and implications for psychotherapeutic practice. J Clin Psychol 55(10):1255–1270. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199910)55:10<1255::AID-JCLP7>3.0.CO;2-F

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan D (1967) On method: toward a reconstruction of psychological investigation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar On BA (1993) Marginality and epistemic privilege. In: Alcoff L, Potter E (eds) Feminist epistemologies. Routledge, New York, pp 83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through data analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L (1996) What is natural about naturalized epistemology? Am Philos Q 33:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Code L (2006) Ecological thinking: the politics of epistemic location. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J, Strauss AL (2008) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond LM (2006) Careful what you ask for: reconsidering feminist epistemology and autobiographical narrative in research on sexual identity development. Signs J Women Cult Soc 31:471–491. doi:10.1086/491684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourdouma A, Mörtl K (2012) The creative journey of GTA: a guideline to its principle and application. Res Psychother Psychopathol Process Outcome 15:96–106. doi:10.7411/RP.2012.010

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL (1999) Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 38:215–229. doi:10.1348/014466599162782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fassinger RE (2005) Paradigm, praxis, problems, and promise: grounded theory in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 52:156–166. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML (2011) Troubling calls for evidence. Fem Psychol 22:3–19. doi:10.1177/0959353511435475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML (2012) Resuscitating critical psychology for ‘revolting’ times. J Soc Issues 68:416–438. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01756.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher GJO (1996) Realism versus relativism in psychology. Am J Psychol 109:409–429. doi:10.2307/1423014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel ZF, Levitt HM (2008) Clients’ experiences of disengaged moments in psychotherapy: a grounded theory analysis. J Contemp Psychother 39:171–186. doi:10.1007/s10879-008-9087-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel ZF, Levitt HM, Murray DM, Greenberg LS, Angus LE (2006) Assessing psychotherapy silences: an empirically derived categorization system and sampling strategy. Psychother Res 16(5):627–638. doi:10.1080/10503300600591635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze IH (2008) Publishing qualitative research in sex roles. Sex Roles 58:1–2. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9376-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze IH (2013) Guidelines for qualitative research being published in sex roles. Sex Roles 69:1–2. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0286-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelo OCG (2012) On research methods and their philosophical assumptions: raising the consciousness of researchers again. Psychother Sozialwiss 2:111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelo OCG, Manzo S (2015) Quantitative approaches to treatment process, change process, and process-outcome research. In: Gelo OCG, Pritz A, Rieken B (eds) Psychotherapy research: foundations, process, and outcome. Springer, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gelo OCG, Braakmann D, Benetka G (2008) Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate. Integr Psychol Behav Sci 42:266–290. doi:10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelo OCG, Braakmann D, Benetka G (2009) Erratum to “Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate”. Integr Psychol Behav Sci 43(4):406–407. doi:10.1007/s12124-009-9107-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen KJ, McNAmee S (2000) From disordering discourse to transformative dialogue. In: Neimeyer RA, Raskin JD (eds) Constructions of disorder: meaning-making frameworks for psychotherapy. APA, Washington, DC, pp 333–349

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi A (2009) The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg LS (2007) A guide to conducting a task analysis of psychotherapeutic change. Psychother Res 17:15–30. doi:10.1080/10503300600720390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In: Denzin N, Lincoln YS (eds) The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 191–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (1986) The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (1998) Is science multi-cultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (2011) The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Duke, Durham, NC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henretty JR, Levitt HM, Mathews SS (2008) Clients’ experiences of moments of sadness in psychotherapy: a grounded theory analysis. Psychother Res 18:243–255. doi:10.1080/10503300701765831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CE, Knox S, Thompson BJ, Williams EN, Hess SA, Ladany N (2005) Consensual qualitative research: an update. J Couns Psychol 52:196–205. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D, Levitt HM (2009) Challenges facing the developing feminist psychotherapist. Women Ther 32:406–422. doi:10.1080/02703140903153377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knickmeyer N, Levitt HM, Horne SG, Bayer G (2003) Responding to mixed messages and double binds: religious oriented coping strategies of Christian battered women. J Relig Abuse 5:55–82. doi:10.1300/J154v05n02_03

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt H (1999) The development of wisdom: an analysis of Tibetan Buddhist experience. J Humanist Psychol 39(2):85–104. doi:10.1177/0022167899392006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM (2001) The sounds of silence in psychotherapy: the categorization of clients’ pauses. Psychother Res 11(3):295–309. doi:10.1080/713663985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt H (2006) Butch, Femme, Bear and Leatherman: a programmatic exploration of gender identities within gay and lesbian subcultures. In: Kam-shing YIP (ed) Psychology of gender identity: an international perspective. Nova Science, Hauppauge, NY, pp 105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Frankel Z (2004) Pausing inventory classification system (PICS) manual, 2nd Revision. Unpublished manuscript, University of Memphis

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt H, Hiestand K (2004) A quest for authenticity: contemporary butch gender. Sex Roles 50:605–621. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000027565.59109.80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Piazza-Bonin EB (2011) Wisdom-based approaches to therapy: challenging the dominant psychotherapy culture. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt H, Ware K (2006) “Anything with two heads is a monster”: religious leaders perspectives on marital equality and domestic violence. Violence Against Women 12(12):1–22. doi:10.1177/1077801206293546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Williams DC (2010) Facilitating client change: principles based upon the experience of eminent psychotherapists. Psychother Res 10:337–352. doi:10.1080/10503300903476708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Neimeyer RA, Williams D (2005) Rules vs. principles in psychotherapy: implications of the quest for universal guidelines in the movement for empirically supported treatments. J Contemp Psychother 35:117–129. doi:10.1007/s10879-005-0807-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Butler M, Hill T (2006) What clients find helpful in psychotherapy: principles for facilitating change. J Couns Psychol 53:314–324. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Todd-Swanger R, Butler JB (2008) Male perpetrators’ perspectives on intimate partner violence, religion, and masculinity. Sex Roles 58:435–448. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9349-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Williams DC, Cifci-Uruk A, Kannan D, Obana M, Smith B, Wang MC, Plexico LW, Camp J, Hardison H, Watts A, Wonch W (2009) The experience of depth curiosity: the pursuit of congruence despite the danger of engulfment. J Constr Psychol 22:187–212. doi:10.1080/10720530902915093

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Dunnavant B (2014) Judicial wisdom: the process of forming wise decisions. J Construct Psychol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt HM, Ippolito MR, Kannan D (2013) Teaching qualitative methods using a research team approach: publishing grounded theory projects with your class. Qual Res Psychol 10:119–139. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.586101

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino H (1993) Subjects, power and knowledge: description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In: Alcoff L, Potter E (eds) Feminist epistemologies. Routledge, New York, pp 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley E, Levitt HM, Mosher C (2007) Understanding the bear movement in gay male culture: redefining masculinity. J Homosex 53:89–112. doi:10.1080/00918360802103365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mörtl K, Gelo OCG (2012) Qualitative research methods. In: Gelo OCG, Pritz A, Rieken B (eds) Psychotherapy research: general issues, process and outcome. Springer, Vienna/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow SL (2005) Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 52:250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mörtl K, Gelo OCG (2015) Qualitative methods in psychotherapy process research. In: Gelo OCG, Pritz A, Rieken B (eds) Psychotherapy research: foundations, process, and outcome. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer RA (2009) Constructivist psychotherapy: distinctive features. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer MJ, Addison RB (1989) Entering the circle: hermeneutic investigation in psychology. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1958) A neglected argument for the existence of god. In: Wiener PP (ed) Values in a Universe of chance: Selected writings of Charles S. Peirce. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1965) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny D (2015) Quantitative data analysis in psychotherapy process research. Structures and procedures. In: Gelo OCG, Pritz A, Rieken B (eds) Psychotherapy research: foundations, process, and outcome. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto JG (2005) Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Couns Psychol 52:126–136. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin JD, Bridges SK (eds) (2008) Studies in meaning 3: constructivist psychotherapy in the real world. Pace University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL (1997) Methodical hermeneutics and humanistic psychology. Humanist Psychol 35:1–14. doi:10.1080/08873260709336693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL (2000) Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics: reconciling realism and relativism. Theory Psychol 10:481–502. doi:10.1177/0959354300104003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL (2006) The grounded theory method: application of a variant of its procedure of constant comparative analysis to psychotherapy research. In: Fischer CT (ed) Qualitative research methods for psychologists: introduction through empirical studies. Elsevier, Boston, MA, pp 59–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL (2010) Humanistic psychology at York University: retrospective: focus on clients’ experiencing in psychotherapy: emphasis of radical reflexivity. Humanist Psychol 38:40–56. doi:10.1080/08873261003635856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL (2012) Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychol Methods 17(3):385–398. doi:10.1037/a0029250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL, Fergus KD (2006) Embodied categorizing in the grounded theory method: methodical hermeneutics in action. Theory Psychol 16:483–503. doi:10.1177/0959354306066202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL, Frommer J (2015) Applications of qualitative and mixed-methods counseling and psychotherapy research. In: Gelo OCG, Pritz A, Rieken B (eds) Psychotherapy research: foundations, process, and outcome. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie DL, Phillips JR, Quartaro GK (1988) Grounded theory: a promising approach to conceptualization in psychology? Can Psychol 29:139–150. doi:10.1037/h0079765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling J (2006) On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: designing the process for content analysis. Eur J Psychol Assess 22:28–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slife BD, Gantt E (1999) Methodological pluralism: a framework for psychotherapy research. J Clin Psychol 55:1453–1465. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1453::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer JV, Levitt HM, Berman JS, Mathews SS (2010) A study of silent disengagement and distressing emotion in psychotherapy. Psychother Res 20:495–510. doi:10.1080/10503301003754515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wertz FJ (2005) Phenomenological research methods in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 52:167–177. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DC, Levitt HM (2008a) Clients’ experiences of difference with therapists: sustaining faith in psychotherapy. Psychother Res 18:256–270. doi:10.1080/10503300701561545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DC, Levitt HM (2008b) When constructs collide: constructivist research on when and how to challenge clients. In: Raskin JD, Bridges SK (eds) Studies in meaning III. Pace University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank David Rennie and Omar C.G. Gelo for sharing their thoughts in response to this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA

    Heidi M. Levitt

Authors
  1. Heidi M. Levitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi M. Levitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Salento, Lecce, Italy, and Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria

    Omar C.G. Gelo

  2. Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria

    Alfred Pritz

  3. Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria

    Bernd Rieken

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levitt, H.M. (2015). Interpretation-Driven Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Grounded Theory Research: A Constructivist-Social Justice Approach. In: Gelo, O., Pritz, A., Rieken, B. (eds) Psychotherapy Research. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1381-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1382-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation