Abstract
The coherence dynamics of the central systems are investigated in the spin-chain environment with topological characterization. For the single- and two-spin coherence, their critical behaviors can detect the topological quantum phase transitions (TQPTs) in weaker coupling regions. Their noncritical behaviors show periodic oscillations or keep constant. For the quantum coherence of a symmetric W state, the bipartite coherence is dominant due to its polygamy. The critical behaviors of global coherence (\(\textrm{QC}_{\mathrm{a:bc}}\) and \(\textrm{QC}_{\mathrm{b:c}}\)) and multipartite monogamy can also detect the TQPTs. In the strong coupling regions (\(g_{a(b,c)} \gg 1\)), the coherence dynamics of single-spin, two-spin, and bipartite block of three-spin system can be characterized by Gaussian envelope, but the envelope line of three-spin coherence can be only described by negative logarithmic function. Finally, the resistance to the topological spin-chain environment becomes stronger from the single- to three-spin coherence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Georgescu, I.M., Ashhab, S., Nori, F.: Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185 (2014)
Gyongyosi, L., Imre, S.: Optimizing high-efficiency quantum memory with quantum machine learning for near-term quantum devices. Sci. Rep. 10, 135 (2020)
Bernsteinl, D.J., Lange, T.: Post-quantum cryptography. Nature 549, 188–194 (2017)
Li, T., Long, G.L.: Quantum secure direct communication based on single-photon Bell-state measurement. New J. Phys. 22, 063017 (2020)
Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A.E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M.S., Ruitenberg, J., Vermeulen, R.F.L., Schouten, R.N., Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Pruneri, V., Mitchell, M.W., Markham, M., Twitchen, D.J., Elkouss, D., Wehner, S., Taminiau, T.H., Hanson, R.: Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015)
Streltsov, A., Chitambar, E., Rana, S., Bera, M.N., Winter, A., Lewenstein, M.: Entanglement and coherence in quantum state merging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240405 (2016)
Liu, Z.W., Bu, K.F., Takagi, R.: One-shot operational quantum resource theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 020401 (2019)
Wu, K.D., Streltsov, A., Regula, B., Xiang, G.Y., Li, C.F., Guo, G.C.: Experimental progress on quantum coherence: detection, quantification, and manipulation. Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100040 (2021)
Girolami, D.: Observable measure of quantum coherence in finite dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 170401 (2014)
Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M., Plenio, M.B.: Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)
Streltsov, A., Rana, S., Boes, P., Eisert, J.: Structure of the resource theory of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 140402 (2017)
Yao, Y., Xiao, X., Ge, L., Sun, C.P.: Quantum coherence in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 92, 022112 (2015)
Napoli, C., Bromley, T.R., Cianciaruso, M., Piani, M., Johnston, N., Adesso, G.: Robustness of coherence: an operational and observable measure of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 150502 (2016)
Streltsov, A., Singh, U., Dhar, H.S., Bera, M.N., Adesso, G.: Measuring quantum coherence with entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020403 (2015)
Streltsov, A., Adesso, G., Plenio, M.B.: Colloquium: quantum coherence as a resource. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 (2017)
Ma, Z.H., Cui, J., Cao, Z., Fei, S.M., Vedral, V., Byrnes, T., Radhakrishnan, C.: Operational advantage of basis-independent quantum coherence. Europhys. Lett. 125, 50005 (2019)
Radhakrishnan, C., Parthasarathy, M., Jambulingam, S., Byrnes, T.: Distribution of quantum coherence in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 150504 (2016)
Radhakrishnan, C., Ding, Z., Shi, F.Z., Du, J.F., Byrnes, T.: Basis-independent quantum coherence and its distribution. Ann. Phys. 409, 167906 (2019)
Wu, K.D., Theurer, T., Xiang, G.Y., Li, C.F., Guo, G.C., Plenio, M.B., Streltsov, A.: Quantum coherence and state conversion: theory and experiment. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 22 (2020)
Yuan, Y., Hou, Z.B., Tang, J.F., Streltsov, A., Xiang, G.Y., Li, C.F., Guo, G.C.: Direct estimation of quantum coherence by collective measurements. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 46 (2020)
Ding, Z., Liu, R., Radhakrishnan, C., Ma, W.C., Peng, X.H., Wang, Y., Byrnes, T., Shi, F.Z., Du, J.F.: Experimental study of quantum coherence decomposition and trade-off relations in a tripartite system. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 145 (2021)
Shao, L.H., Xi, Z.J., Fan, H., Li, Y.M.: Fidelity and trace-norm distances for quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. A 91, 042120 (2015)
Yuan, X., Zhou, H.Y., Cao, Z., Ma, X.F.: Intrinsic randomness as a measure of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. A 92, 022124 (2015)
Yu, X.D., Zhang, D.J., Xu, G.F., Tong, D.M.: Alternative framework for quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. A 94, 060302(R) (2016)
Yu, C.S.: Quantum coherence via skew information and its polygamy. Phys. Rev. A 95, 042337 (2017)
Mandal, S., Narozniak, M., Radhakrishnan, C., Jiao, Z.Q., Jin, X.M., Byrnes, T.: Characterizing coherence with quantum observables. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013157 (2020)
Radhakrishnan, C., Ermakov, I., Byrnes, T.: Quantum coherence of planar spin models with Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. A 96, 012341 (2017)
Radhakrishnan, C., Parthasarathy, M., Jambulingam, S., Byrnes, T.: Quantum coherence of the Heisenberg spin models with Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya interactions. Sci. Rep. 7, 13865 (2017)
Sha, Y.T., Wang, Y., Sun, Z.H., Hou, X.W.: Thermal quantum coherence and correlation in the extended XY spin chain. Ann. Phys. 392, 229 (2018)
Ye, B.L., Li, B., Wang, Z.X., Li-Jost, X.Q., Fei, S.M.: Quantum Fisher information and coherence in one-dimensional XY spin models with Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya interactions. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61, 110312 (2018)
You, W.L., Wang, Y.M., Yi, T.C., Zhang, C.J., Olés, A.M.: Quantum coherence in a compass chain under an alternating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 97, 224420 (2018)
Yi, T.C., You, W.L., Wu, N., Olés, A.M.: Criticality and factorization in the Heisenberg chain with Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 100, 024423 (2019)
Hu, M.L., Gao, Y.Y., Fan, H.: Steered quantum coherence as a signature of quantum phase transitions in spin chains. Phys. Rev. A 101, 032305 (2020)
Yin, S.Y., Song, J., Liu, S.T., Wang, Y.Y., Li, L., Sun, W.J.: Basis-independent quantum coherence and its distribution in spin chains with three-site interaction. Phys. A 597, 127239 (2022)
Qin, M., Li, Y.B., Bai, Z., Wang, X.: Quantum coherence and its distribution in a two-dimensional Heisenberg XY model. Phys. A 600, 127472 (2022)
Huang, Z.M., Situ, H.Z.: Non-Markovian dynamics of quantum coherence of two-level system driven by classical field. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 222 (2017)
Yin, S.Y., Song, J., Xu, X.X., Zhang, Y.J., Liu, S.T.: Quantum coherence dynamics of three-qubit states in XY spin-chain environment. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 296 (2018)
Radhakrishnan, C., Lü, Z.G., Jing, J., Byrnes, T.: Dynamics of quantum coherence in a spin-star system: bipartite initial state and coherence distribution. Phys. Rev. A 100, 042333 (2019)
Yin, S.Y., Song, J., Liu, S.T., Luan, H.L.: Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics of quantum coherence in the extended XX chain. Phys. Rev. A 106, 032220 (2022)
Radhakrishnan, C., Chen, P.W., Jambulingam, S., Byrnes, T., Ali, M.M.: Time dynamics of quantum coherence and monogamy in a non-Markovian environment. Sci. Rep. 9, 2363 (2019)
Zeng, H.S., Cao, H.M.: Distribution and evolution of quantum coherence for open multi-qubit systems in non-inertial frames. Ann. Phys. 533, 2000606 (2021)
Jafari, R., Akbari, A.: Dynamics of quantum coherence and quantum Fisher information after a sudden quench. Phys. Rev. A 101, 062105 (2020)
Cao, H., Radhakrishnan, C., Su, M., Ali, M.M., Zhang, C., Huang, Y.F., Byrnes, T., Li, C.F., Guo, G.C.: Fragility of quantum correlations and coherence in a multipartite photonic system. Phys. Rev. A 102, 012403 (2020)
Sachdev, S.: Quantum Phase Transitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Yuan, Z.G., Zhang, P., Li, S.S.: Loschmidt echo and Berry phase of a quantum system coupled to an XY spin chain: proximity to a quantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. A 75, 012102 (2007)
Yuan, Z.G., Zhang, P., Li, S.S.: Disentanglement of two qubits coupled to an XY spin chain: role of quantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042118 (2007)
Karpat, G., Cakmak, B., Fanchini, F.F.: Quantum coherence and uncertainty in the anisotropic XY chain. Phys. Rev. B 90, 104431 (2014)
Malvezzi, A.L., Karpat, G., Cakmak, B., Fanchini, F.F., Debarba, T., Vianna, R.O.: Quantum correlations and coherence in spin-1 Heisenberg chains. Phys. Rev. B 93, 184428 (2016)
Li, Y.C., Lin, H.Q.: Quantum coherence and quantum phase transitions. Sci. Rep. 6, 26365 (2016)
Mahmoudi, M., Mahdavifar, S., Zadeh, T.M., Soltani, M.R.: Non-Markovian dynamics in the extended cluster spin-1/2 XX chain. Phys. Rev. A 95, 012336 (2017)
Hu, M.L., Hu, X.Y., Wang, J.C., Peng, Y., Zhang, Y.R., Fan, H.: Quantum coherence and geometric quantum discord. Phys. Rep. 762, 1 (2018)
Hu, M.L., Fang, F., Fan, H.: Finite-size scaling of coherence and steered coherence in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model. Phys. Rev. A 104, 062416 (2021)
Mao, R., Dai, Y.W., Cho, S.Y., Zhou, H.Q.: Quantum coherence and spin nematic to nematic quantum phase transitions in biquadratic spin-1 and spin-2 XY chains with rhombic single-ion anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 103, 014446 (2021)
Zhao, Z., Yi, T.C., Xue, M., You, W.L.: Characterizing quantum criticality and steered coherence in the XY-Gamma chain. Phys. Rev. A 105, 063306 (2022)
Liu, X.Y., Hu, M.L.: Average quantum coherence and its use in probing quantum phase transitions. Phys. A 609, 128308 (2023)
Mahmoudi, M.: The effects of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction on entanglement dynamics of a spin chain in a non-Markovian regime. Phys. A 545, 123707 (2020)
Zhang, G., Song, Z.: Topological characterization of extended quantum Ising models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 177204 (2015)
Farajollahpour, T., Jafari, S.A.: Topological phase transition of the anisotropic XY model with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 98, 085136 (2018)
Zeng, B., Chen, X., Zhou, D.L., Wen, X.G.: Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter: From Quantum Entanglement to Topological Phases of Many-Body Systems. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2019)
Nayak, C., Simon, S.H., Stern, A., Freedman, M., Das Sarma, S.: Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)
Pezzè, L., Gabbrielli, M., Lepori, L., Smerzi, A.: Multipartite entanglement in topological quantum phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250401 (2017)
Zhang, Y.R., Zeng, Y., Fan, H., You, J.Q., Nori, F.: Characterization of topological states via dual multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 250501 (2018)
Randeep, N.C., Surendran, N.: Topological entanglement entropy of the three-dimensional Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. B 98, 125136 (2018)
Cheng, W.W., Li, B., Gong, L.Y., Zhao, S.M.: Quantum speed limit and topological quantum phase transition in an extended XY model. Phys. A 597, 127242 (2022)
Yin, S.Y., Song, J., Liu, S.T.: Quantum Fisher information in quantum critical systems with topological characterization. Phys. Rev. B 100, 184417 (2019)
Dong, L.Z., Bao, J., Guo, B., Sun, Z.Y.: Quantum nonlocality and topological quantum phase transitions in the extended Ising chain. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 425405 (2022)
Li, S.P., Sun, Z.H.: Local and intrinsic quantum coherence in critical systems. Phys. Rev. A 98, 022317 (2018)
Chen, Q., Zhang, G.Q., Cheng, J.Q., Xu, J.B.: Topological quantum phase transitions in the 2-D Kitaev honeycomb model. Quantum Inf. Process. 18, 8 (2019)
Yin, S.Y., Song, J., Liu, S.T., Guo, G.L.: Quantum coherence and topological quantum phase transitions in the extended XY chain. Phys. Lett. A 389, 127089 (2021)
Guo, J.L., Zhang, X.Z.: Quantum correlation dynamics subjected to critical spin environment with short-range anisotropic interaction. Sci. Rep. 6, 32634 (2016)
Zhang, X.Z., Guo, J.L.: Quantum correlation and quantum phase transition in the one-dimensional extended Ising model. Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 223 (2017)
Coffman, V., Kundu, J., Wootters, W.K.: Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Heilongjiang Provincial Universities (Grant no. 2021-KYYWF-0188). We thank Dr. Jin-Liang Guo for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hongliang Luan prepared Figs. 1–10 and wrote the original draft; Qiang Zhang and Jing Wen contributed to the development and fine-tuning of the algorithm, and performed substantial debugging and code optimization; Shaoying Yin supervised the project, provided strategic direction in algorithm development and testing, and conducted a thorough review and final approval of the manuscript prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Coherence dynamics and TQPTs induced by the anisotropy parameters
Some references have reported that the topological phase transition points are \(\gamma _{c1}=(-\sqrt{5}+1)/2\) and \(\gamma _{c2}=(\sqrt{5}+1)/2\) as the anisotropy of the nearest-neighbor spins \(\gamma \) is the driving parameter, and \(\delta _{c1}\approx -1.2747\) and \(\delta _{c2} \approx 0.5604\) as the anisotropy of next-to-nearest-neighbor spins \(\delta \) is the driving parameter [64,65,66, 69]. Based on these results, we have displayed the coherence dynamics of the single-spin system as a function of \(\gamma \) and \(\delta \) in Fig. 9a and b, respectively. It is found that the single-spin coherence tends to undergo a rapid decay near each TQPT, but there is a surge at the critical point \(\delta _{c2}\). The more detailed information can see Fig. 9c and d, which display the single-spin coherence as a function of the parameters \(\gamma \) and \(\delta \) at \(t=10\). One can observe that the quantum coherence is sensitive to the parameters \(\gamma \) and \(\delta \). Although the quantum coherence declines sharply around the TQPTs, it always increases sharply at the phase transition points, especially at the critical point \(\delta _{c2}\). This situation is similar to single-spin and two-spin coherence at the critical point \(\alpha _{c3}=(\sqrt{5}-1)/2\), and Cheng et al. also proved that non-Markovianity decreases to zero on each side of the critical point \(\left( \delta _{c2}\right) \) and exhibits a local maximum on the point exactly in their Fig. 5b [64]. We all know that the non-Markovianity can describe the memory effects and the backflow of information from the surrounding environment. Hence, we can understand that the backflow of coherence information from the spin-chain environment prevents the decay of single-spin coherence.
Coherence distribution of a tripartite system
We briefly illustrate the coherence distribution of a tripartite system in this section [21]. A geometric picture of different coherences is displayed in Fig. 10, and the distances between any two states represent the different coherences. It is found that the three-spin coherence, also known as absolute coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{A}}\), can be decomposed in two ways: one is the global coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{G}}\) and local coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{L}}\), the other is \({\textrm{QC}}_{\mathrm{a:bc}}\) and \(\textrm{QC}_{\textrm{A}}^{{\mathrm{a:bc}}}\). Here, \(\textrm{QC}_{a:bc}\) describes the coherence between qubit a and the bipartite block bc. \({\textrm{QC}}_{\mathrm {b:c}}\) measures the coherence in the bipartite block bc. They both constitute the coherence distribution of \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{G}}\). \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{A}}^{\mathrm {a:bc}}\) evaluates the coherence between the \(\rho _a\otimes \rho _{bc}\) and \([\pi \left( \rho \right) ]_d\), and it can be decomposed into \({\textrm{QC}}_{\mathrm {b:c}}\) and \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{L}}\). Based on the geometric diagram of the coherence distribution in Fig. 10, there are four triangles, and each triangle satisfies the trade-off relation. They can be expressed as
In our work, there is no local coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{L}}\) for the symmetric W state due to the \(\pi \left( \rho \right) =[\pi \left( \rho \right) ]_d\), and the absolute coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{A}}\) is equal to the global coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{{\textrm{G}}}\). Thus, we have investigated the physical properties of absolute coherence \({\textrm{QC}}_{\textrm{A}}\) and its coherence distribution (\({\textrm{QC}}_{{\mathrm {a:bc}}}\) and \({\textrm{QC}}_{\mathrm {b:c}}\)) in the topologically critical environment. By the way, the geometric diagram in Fig. 10 is not the only coherence distribution. For example, the three-spin coherence can also be decomposed into the \(\textrm{QC}_{ab:c}\) and \(\textrm{QC}_{a:b}\) or \(\textrm{QC}_{ac:b}\) and \(\textrm{QC}_{a:c}\).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Luan, H., Zhang, Q., Wen, J. et al. Coherence dynamics of spin systems in critical environment with topological characterization. Quantum Inf Process 23, 163 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-024-04372-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-024-04372-3