Abstract
The Helping to End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL) Prevention Cooperative (HPC) is rapidly developing 10 distinct evidence-based interventions for implementation in a variety of settings to prevent opioid misuse and opioid use disorder. One HPC objective is to compare intervention impacts on opioid misuse initiation, escalation, severity, and disorder and identify whether any HPC interventions are more effective than others for types of individuals. It provides a rare opportunity to prospectively harmonize measures across distinct outcomes studies. This paper describes the needs, opportunities, strategies, and processes that were used to harmonize HPC data. They are illustrated with a strategy to measure opioid use that spans the spectrum of opioid use experiences (termed involvement) and is composed of common “anchor items” ranging from initiation to symptoms of opioid use disorder. The limitations and opportunities anticipated from this approach to data harmonization are reviewed. Lastly, implications for future research cooperatives and the broader HEAL data ecosystem are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
HPC data collection is ongoing and data analyses have not yet occurred.
References
Baiden, P., Graaf, G., Zaami, M., Acolatse, C. K., & Adeku, Y. (2019). Examining the association between prescription opioid misuse and suicidal behaviors among adolescent high school students in the United States. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 112, 44–51.
Bauer, D. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models. Psychological Methods, 14, 101.
Bonar, E. E., Kidwell, K. M., Bohnert, A. S. B., Bourque, C. A., Carter, P. M., Clark, S. J., Glantz, M. D., King, C. A., Losman, E. D., McCabe, S. E., Philyaw-Kotov, M. L., Prosser, L. A., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zheng, K., & Walton, M. A. (2021). Optimizing scalable, technology-supported behavioral interventions to prevent opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 108, 106,523.
Brook, J. S., Lee, J. Y., Finch, S. J., Koppel, J., & Brook, D. W. (2011). Psychosocial factors related to cannabis use disorders. Substance Abuse, 32, 242–251.
Brown, C. H., Brincks, A., Huang, S., Perrino, T., Cruden, G., Pantin, H., Howe, G., Young, J. F., Beardslee, W., Montag, S., & Sandler, I. (2018). Two-year impact of prevention programs on adolescent depression: An integrative data analysis approach. Prevention Science, 19, 74–94.
Capistrant, B. D., & Nakash, O. (2019). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults have higher prevalence of illicit opioid use than heterosexual adults: Evidence from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2015–2017. LGBT Health, 6, 326–330.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). 1991–2019 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey data. Retrieved from http://nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/.
Chan, A.-W., Krleža-Jerić, K., Schmid, I., & Altman, D. G. (2004). Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Canadian Medical Association Journal , 171, 735–740.
Chandler, R. K., Kahana, S. Y., Fletcher, B., Jones, D., Finger, M. S., Aklin, W. M., Hamill, K., & Webb, C. (2015). Data collection and harmonization in HIV research: The Seek, Test, Treat and Retain Initiative at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2416–2422.
Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914
Curran, P. J., McGinley, J. S., Bauer, D. J., Hussong, A. M., Burns, A., Chassin, L., Sher, K., & Zucker, R. (2014). A moderated nonlinear factor model for the development of commensurate measures in integrative data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 214–231.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (2021). Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development: The ABCD Study is the largest long-term study of brain development and child health in the United States. Retrieved from https://abcdstudy.org/.
Ducharme, L. J., Wiley, T. R., Mulford, C. F., Su, Z. I., & Zur, J. B. (2021). Engaging the justice system to address the opioid crisis: The Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 128, 108307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108307
Fortier, I., Doiron, D., Burton, P., & Raina, P. (2011). Consolidating data harmonization-How to obtain quality and applicability? American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 261–264.
Fortier, I., Doiron, D., Little, J., Ferretti, V., L’Heureux, F., Stolk, R. P., Knoppers, B. M., Hudson, T. J., Burton, P. R., On behalf of the International Harmonization Initiative. (2011). Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 1314–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr106
Haller, M., Handley, E., Chassin, L., & Bountress, K. (2010). Developmental cascades: Linking adolescent substance use, affiliation with substance use promoting peers, and academic achievement to adult substance use disorders. Development and psychopathology, 22(4), 899-916.
Hamilton, C. M., Strader, L. C., Pratt, J. G., Maiese, D., Hendershot, T., Kwok, R. K., Hammond, J. A., Huggins, W., Jackman, D., Pan, H., Nettles, D. S., Beaty, T. H., Farrer, L. A., Kraft, P., Marazita, M. L., Ordovas, J. M., Pato, C. N., Spitz, M. R., Wagener, D., & Haines, J. (2011). The PhenX Toolkit: Get the most from your measures. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 253–260.
Hedegaard, H., Curtin, S. C., & Warner, M. (2020). Increase in suicide mortality in the United States, 1999–2018. NCHS Data Brief, No 362. Retrieved at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db362-h.pdf
Hussong, A. M., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2013). Integrative data analysis in clinical psychology research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 61–89.
Hussong, A. M., Jones, D. J., Stein, G. L., Baucom, D. H., & Boeding, S. (2011). An internalizing pathway to alcohol use and disorder. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 390.
LeNoue, S. R., & Riggs, P. D. (2016). Substance abuse prevention. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.007
Makol, B. A., De Los Reyes, A., Ostrander, R. S., & Reynolds, E. K. (2019). Parent-youth divergence (and convergence) in reports of youth internalizing problems in psychiatric inpatient care. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47, 1677–1689.
National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2018). HEAL Initiative: Preventing opioid use disorder in older adolescents and young adults (ages 16–30). Accessed on October 16, 2021 at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-DA-19–035.html.
National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2021). All of Us Research Program: The future begins with you. Retrieved from https://allofus.nih.gov/.
Perrino, T., Beardslee, W., Bernal, G., Brincks, A., Cruden, G., Howe, G., & Brown, C. H. (2015). Toward scientific equity for the prevention of depression and depressive symptoms in vulnerable youth. Prevention Science, 16(5), 642-651.
Preisser, J. S., Das, K., Long, D. L., & Divaris, K. (2016). Marginalized zero-inflated negative binomial regression with application to dental caries. Statistics in Medicine, 35, 1722–1735.
Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A. & Allen, D. N. (2021). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In Mastering modern psychological testing (pp. 573–613). Springer, Cham.
Ridenour, T. A., Lanza, S. T., Donny, E. C., & Clark, D. B. (2006). Different lengths of times for progressions in adolescent substance involvement. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 962–983.
Ridenour, T. A., Maldonado-Molina, M., Compton, W. M., Spitznagel, E. L., & Cottler, L. B. (2005). Factors associated with the transition from abuse to dependence among substance abusers: Implications for a measure of addictive liability. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 80, 1–14.
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Wiley & Sons.
Saavedra, L. M., Morgan-López, A. A., Hien, D. A., Lopez-Castro, T., Ruglass, L. M., Back, S. E., & Hamblen, J. (2021). Evaluating treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol and other drug use disorders using meta-analysis of individual patient data: Design and methodology of a virtual clinical trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 107, 106479.
Saha, T. D., Compton, W. M., Chou, S. P., Smith, S., Ruan, W. J., Huang, B., Pickering, R. P. & Grant, B. F. (2012). Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 1. Toward amphetamine, cocaine and prescription drug use disorder continua using Item Response Theory. Drug and alcohol dependence, 122(1–2), 38–46.
Saunders, J. B. (2017). Substance use and addictive disorders in DSM-5 and ICD 10 and the draft ICD 11. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 30, 227–237.
Siddique, J., de Chavez, P. J., Howe, G., Cruden, G., & Brown, C. H. (2018). Limitations in using multiple imputation to harmonize individual participant data for meta-analysis. Prevention Science, 19(1), 95-108.
Stanis, J. J., & Andersen, S. L. (2014). Reducing substance use during adolescence: A translational framework for prevention. Psychopharmacology (berl), 231, 1437–1453.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2019). Substance misuse prevention for young adults. Publication No. PEP19-PL-Guide-1. Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/pep19-pl-guide-1.pdf
Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2015). Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 51, 1-18.
Volkow, N. D., Jones, E. B., Einstein, E. B., & Wargo, E. M. (2019). Prevention and treatment of opioid misuse and addiction: A review. Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, 76, 208–216.
Williams, N. J. (2016). Multilevel mechanisms of implementation strategies in mental health: Integrating theory, research, and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43, 783–798.
Zaninotto, P., & Falaschetti, E. (2011). Comparison of methods for modelling a count outcome with excess zeros: Application to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65, 205–210.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH HEAL Initiative as part of the HEAL Prevention Initiative. The authors gratefully acknowledge the collaborative contributions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and support from the following awards: Emory University and the Cherokee Nation (UH3DA050234; MPIs Kelli Komro, Terrence Kominsky, Juli Skinner); Massachusetts General Hospital (UH3DA050252; MPIs Timothy Wilens, Amy Yule); The Ohio State University (UH3DA050174; MPIs Natasha Slesnick, Kelly Kelleher); Oregon Social Learning Center (UH3DA050193, Lisa Saldana); RAND Corporation (UH3DA050235, Elizabeth D’Amico, Daniel Dickerson); RTI International (U24DA050182; MPIs Phillip Graham, Ty Ridenour); Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington (UH3DA050189; MPIs Kym Ahrens, Kevin Haggerty); Texas Christian University (UH3DA050250; PI Danica Knight); University of Michigan (UH3DA050173; MPIs Maureen Walton, Erin Boner); University of Oregon (P50DA048756; Elizabeth Stormshak); and Yale University (UH3DA050251; PI Lynn Fiellin).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All studies that are described or referenced herein have been reviewed and approved by the Investigators’ respective Institutional Review Boards. All procedures with human subjects were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institute and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to Participate
N/A.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or its NIH HEAL Initiative.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ridenour, T.A., Cruden, G., Yang, Y. et al. Methodological Strategies for Prospective Harmonization of Studies: Application to 10 Distinct Outcomes Studies of Preventive Interventions Targeting Opioid Misuse. Prev Sci 24 (Suppl 1), 16–29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01412-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01412-1