Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methodological Strategies for Prospective Harmonization of Studies: Application to 10 Distinct Outcomes Studies of Preventive Interventions Targeting Opioid Misuse

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Helping to End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL) Prevention Cooperative (HPC) is rapidly developing 10 distinct evidence-based interventions for implementation in a variety of settings to prevent opioid misuse and opioid use disorder. One HPC objective is to compare intervention impacts on opioid misuse initiation, escalation, severity, and disorder and identify whether any HPC interventions are more effective than others for types of individuals. It provides a rare opportunity to prospectively harmonize measures across distinct outcomes studies. This paper describes the needs, opportunities, strategies, and processes that were used to harmonize HPC data. They are illustrated with a strategy to measure opioid use that spans the spectrum of opioid use experiences (termed involvement) and is composed of common “anchor items” ranging from initiation to symptoms of opioid use disorder. The limitations and opportunities anticipated from this approach to data harmonization are reviewed. Lastly, implications for future research cooperatives and the broader HEAL data ecosystem are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. HPC data collection is ongoing and data analyses have not yet occurred.

References

  • Baiden, P., Graaf, G., Zaami, M., Acolatse, C. K., & Adeku, Y. (2019). Examining the association between prescription opioid misuse and suicidal behaviors among adolescent high school students in the United States. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 112, 44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models. Psychological Methods, 14, 101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bonar, E. E., Kidwell, K. M., Bohnert, A. S. B., Bourque, C. A., Carter, P. M., Clark, S. J., Glantz, M. D., King, C. A., Losman, E. D., McCabe, S. E., Philyaw-Kotov, M. L., Prosser, L. A., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zheng, K., & Walton, M. A. (2021). Optimizing scalable, technology-supported behavioral interventions to prevent opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 108, 106,523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook, J. S., Lee, J. Y., Finch, S. J., Koppel, J., & Brook, D. W. (2011). Psychosocial factors related to cannabis use disorders. Substance Abuse, 32, 242–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H., Brincks, A., Huang, S., Perrino, T., Cruden, G., Pantin, H., Howe, G., Young, J. F., Beardslee, W., Montag, S., & Sandler, I. (2018). Two-year impact of prevention programs on adolescent depression: An integrative data analysis approach. Prevention Science, 19, 74–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Capistrant, B. D., & Nakash, O. (2019). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults have higher prevalence of illicit opioid use than heterosexual adults: Evidence from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2015–2017. LGBT Health, 6, 326–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). 1991–2019 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey data. Retrieved from http://nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/.

  • Chan, A.-W., Krleža-Jerić, K., Schmid, I., & Altman, D. G. (2004). Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Canadian Medical Association Journal , 171, 735–740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, R. K., Kahana, S. Y., Fletcher, B., Jones, D., Finger, M. S., Aklin, W. M., Hamill, K., & Webb, C. (2015). Data collection and harmonization in HIV research: The Seek, Test, Treat and Retain Initiative at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2416–2422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., McGinley, J. S., Bauer, D. J., Hussong, A. M., Burns, A., Chassin, L., Sher, K., & Zucker, R. (2014). A moderated nonlinear factor model for the development of commensurate measures in integrative data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 214–231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (2021). Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development: The ABCD Study is the largest long-term study of brain development and child health in the United States. Retrieved from https://abcdstudy.org/.

  • Ducharme, L. J., Wiley, T. R., Mulford, C. F., Su, Z. I., & Zur, J. B. (2021). Engaging the justice system to address the opioid crisis: The Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment128, 108307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108307

  • Fortier, I., Doiron, D., Burton, P., & Raina, P. (2011). Consolidating data harmonization-How to obtain quality and applicability? American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 261–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortier, I., Doiron, D., Little, J., Ferretti, V., L’Heureux, F., Stolk, R. P., Knoppers, B. M., Hudson, T. J., Burton, P. R., On behalf of the International Harmonization Initiative. (2011). Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 1314–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr106

  • Haller, M., Handley, E., Chassin, L., & Bountress, K. (2010). Developmental cascades: Linking adolescent substance use, affiliation with substance use promoting peers, and academic achievement to adult substance use disorders. Development and psychopathology22(4), 899-916.

  • Hamilton, C. M., Strader, L. C., Pratt, J. G., Maiese, D., Hendershot, T., Kwok, R. K., Hammond, J. A., Huggins, W., Jackman, D., Pan, H., Nettles, D. S., Beaty, T. H., Farrer, L. A., Kraft, P., Marazita, M. L., Ordovas, J. M., Pato, C. N., Spitz, M. R., Wagener, D., & Haines, J. (2011). The PhenX Toolkit: Get the most from your measures. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 253–260.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, H., Curtin, S. C., & Warner, M. (2020). Increase in suicide mortality in the United States, 1999–2018. NCHS Data Brief, No 362. Retrieved at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db362-h.pdf

  • Hussong, A. M., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2013). Integrative data analysis in clinical psychology research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 61–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hussong, A. M., Jones, D. J., Stein, G. L., Baucom, D. H., & Boeding, S. (2011). An internalizing pathway to alcohol use and disorder. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LeNoue, S. R., & Riggs, P. D. (2016). Substance abuse prevention. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makol, B. A., De Los Reyes, A., Ostrander, R. S., & Reynolds, E. K. (2019). Parent-youth divergence (and convergence) in reports of youth internalizing problems in psychiatric inpatient care. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47, 1677–1689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2018). HEAL Initiative: Preventing opioid use disorder in older adolescents and young adults (ages 16–30). Accessed on October 16, 2021 at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-DA-19–035.html.

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2021). All of Us Research Program: The future begins with you. Retrieved from https://allofus.nih.gov/.

  • Perrino, T., Beardslee, W., Bernal, G., Brincks, A., Cruden, G., Howe, G., & Brown, C. H. (2015). Toward scientific equity for the prevention of depression and depressive symptoms in vulnerable youth. Prevention Science16(5), 642-651.

  • Preisser, J. S., Das, K., Long, D. L., & Divaris, K. (2016). Marginalized zero-inflated negative binomial regression with application to dental caries. Statistics in Medicine, 35, 1722–1735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A. & Allen, D. N. (2021). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In Mastering modern psychological testing (pp. 573–613). Springer, Cham.

  • Ridenour, T. A., Lanza, S. T., Donny, E. C., & Clark, D. B. (2006). Different lengths of times for progressions in adolescent substance involvement. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 962–983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ridenour, T. A., Maldonado-Molina, M., Compton, W. M., Spitznagel, E. L., & Cottler, L. B. (2005). Factors associated with the transition from abuse to dependence among substance abusers: Implications for a measure of addictive liability. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 80, 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, L. M., Morgan-López, A. A., Hien, D. A., Lopez-Castro, T., Ruglass, L. M., Back, S. E., & Hamblen, J. (2021). Evaluating treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol and other drug use disorders using meta-analysis of individual patient data: Design and methodology of a virtual clinical trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials107, 106479.

  • Saha, T. D., Compton, W. M., Chou, S. P., Smith, S., Ruan, W. J., Huang, B., Pickering, R. P. & Grant, B. F. (2012). Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 1. Toward amphetamine, cocaine and prescription drug use disorder continua using Item Response Theory. Drug and alcohol dependence122(1–2), 38–46.

  • Saunders, J. B. (2017). Substance use and addictive disorders in DSM-5 and ICD 10 and the draft ICD 11. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 30, 227–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, J., de Chavez, P. J., Howe, G., Cruden, G., & Brown, C. H. (2018). Limitations in using multiple imputation to harmonize individual participant data for meta-analysis. Prevention Science19(1), 95-108.

  • Stanis, J. J., & Andersen, S. L. (2014). Reducing substance use during adolescence: A translational framework for prevention. Psychopharmacology (berl), 231, 1437–1453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2019). Substance misuse prevention for young adults. Publication No. PEP19-PL-Guide-1. Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/pep19-pl-guide-1.pdf

  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2015). Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of substance abuse treatment51, 1-18.

  • Volkow, N. D., Jones, E. B., Einstein, E. B., & Wargo, E. M. (2019). Prevention and treatment of opioid misuse and addiction: A review. Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, 76, 208–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N. J. (2016). Multilevel mechanisms of implementation strategies in mental health: Integrating theory, research, and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43, 783–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaninotto, P., & Falaschetti, E. (2011). Comparison of methods for modelling a count outcome with excess zeros: Application to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65, 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH HEAL Initiative as part of the HEAL Prevention Initiative. The authors gratefully acknowledge the collaborative contributions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and support from the following awards: Emory University and the Cherokee Nation (UH3DA050234; MPIs Kelli Komro, Terrence Kominsky, Juli Skinner); Massachusetts General Hospital (UH3DA050252; MPIs Timothy Wilens, Amy Yule); The Ohio State University (UH3DA050174; MPIs Natasha Slesnick, Kelly Kelleher); Oregon Social Learning Center (UH3DA050193, Lisa Saldana); RAND Corporation (UH3DA050235, Elizabeth D’Amico, Daniel Dickerson); RTI International (U24DA050182; MPIs Phillip Graham, Ty Ridenour); Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington (UH3DA050189; MPIs Kym Ahrens, Kevin Haggerty); Texas Christian University (UH3DA050250; PI Danica Knight); University of Michigan (UH3DA050173; MPIs Maureen Walton, Erin Boner); University of Oregon (P50DA048756; Elizabeth Stormshak); and Yale University (UH3DA050251; PI Lynn Fiellin).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ty A. Ridenour.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All studies that are described or referenced herein have been reviewed and approved by the Investigators’ respective Institutional Review Boards. All procedures with human subjects were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institute and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

N/A.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or its NIH HEAL Initiative.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ridenour, T.A., Cruden, G., Yang, Y. et al. Methodological Strategies for Prospective Harmonization of Studies: Application to 10 Distinct Outcomes Studies of Preventive Interventions Targeting Opioid Misuse. Prev Sci 24 (Suppl 1), 16–29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01412-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01412-1

Keywords

Navigation