Abstract
This paper contributes to the analysis of the peripheral (point) spectrum of positive linear operators on Banach lattices. We show that, under appropriate growth and regularity conditions, the peripheral point spectrum of a positive operator is cyclic and that the corresponding eigenspaces fulfil a certain dimension estimate. A couple of examples demonstrates that some of our theorems are optimal. Our results on the peripheral point spectrum are then used to prove a sufficient condition for the peripheral spectrum of a positive operator to be cyclic; this generalizes theorems of Lotz and Scheffold.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alekhno, E.A.: Some properties of essential spectra of a positive operator. Positivity 11(3), 375–386 (2007). doi:10.1007/s11117-007-2088-4
Alekhno, E.A.: Some properties of essential spectra of a positive operator, II. Positivity 13(1), 3–20 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11117-008-2221-z
Arendt, W., Grabosch, A., Greiner, G., Groh, U., Lotz, H.P., Moustakas, U., Nagel, R., Neubrander, F., Schlotterbeck, U.: One-parameter semigroups of positive operators. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1184. Springer, Berlin (1986)
Bernau, S.J., Huijsmans, C.B.: On the positivity of the unit element in a normed lattice ordered algebra. Stud. Math. 97(2), 143–149 (1990)
Derriennic, Y., Lin, M.: On invariant measures and ergodic theorems for positive operators. J. Funct. Anal. 13, 252–267 (1973)
Emel’yanov, E.Y.: Non-Spectral Asymptotic Analysis of One-Parameter Operator Semigroups, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 173. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2007)
Emel’yanov, E.Y., Erkursun, N.: Generalization of Eberlein’s and Sine’s ergodic theorems to LR-nets. Vladikavkaz. Mat. Zh. 9(3), 22–26 (2007)
Émilion, R.: Mean-bounded operators and mean ergodic theorems. J. Funct. Anal. 61(1), 1–14 (1985). doi:10.1016/0022-1236(85)90037-0
Engel, K.J., Nagel, R.: One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Graduate Texts in Athematics, vol. 194. Springer, New York (2000). With contributions by S. Brendle, M. Campiti, T. Hahn, G. Metafune, G. Nickel, D. Pallara, C. Perazzoli, A. Rhandi, S. Romanelli and R. Schnaubelt
Gao, N.: Extensions of Perron-Frobenius theory. Positivity 17(4), 965–977 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11117-012-0215-3
Giaquinta, M., Modica, G.: Mathematical Analysis. Approximation and Discrete Processes. Birkhäuser Boston Inc, Boston (2004). Translated and Revised from the Italian Original
Glück, J.: A markov operator and a markov semigroup on \({C}({K})\) with non-cyclic peripheral point spectrum. Ulmer Seminare über Funktionalanalysis and Differentialgleichungen 19, 205–209 (2014)
Grobler, J.J.: Spectral theory in Banach lattices. In: Huijsmans, C.B., Kaashoek, M.A., Luxemburg, W.A.J., de Pagter, B. (eds) Operator Theory in Function Spaces and Banach Lattices, vol. 75, pp. 133–172. Birkhäuser, Basel (1995)
Heinrich, S.: Ultraproducts in Banach space theory. J. Reine Angew. Math. 313, 72–104 (1980). doi:10.1515/crll.1980.313.72
Keicher, V., Nagel, R.: Positive semigroups behave asymptotically as rotation groups. Positivity 12(1), 93–103 (2008). doi:10.1007/s11117-007-2153-z
Kreĭn, M.G., Rutman, M.A.: Linear operators leaving invariant a cone in a Banach space. Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 1950(26), 128 (1950)
Krengel, U.: Ergodic theorems, de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 6. Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin (1985). doi:10.1515/9783110844641. With a supplement by A. Brunel
Krieger, H.J.: Beiträge zur Theorie positiver Operatoren. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin (1969). Schriftenreihe der Institute für Mathematik. Reihe A: Reine Mathematik, Heft 6
Lotz, H.P.: Über das spektrum positiver operatoren. Math. Z. 108, 15–32 (1968)
Meyer-Nieberg, P.: Banach Lattices. Universitext. Springer, Berlin (1991). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-76724-1
Schaefer, H.H.: Banach Lattices and Positive Operators. Springer, New York (1974). Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 215
Scheffold, E.: Das Spektrum von Verbandsoperatoren in Banachverbänden. Math. Z. 123, 177–190 (1971)
Zhang, X.D.: On spectral properties of positive operators. Indag. Math. 4(1), 111–127 (1993). doi:10.1016/0019-3577(93)90057-6
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Manuel Bernhard and Manfred Sauter for their help in the construction of Example 7.7; moreover, Manfred Sauter assisted me with the proof of Lemma A.4. My thanks also go to Rainer Nagel who suggested the investigation of weakly almost periodic operators in the context of Theorem 5.5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
During his work on this article the author was supported by a scholarship of the “Landesgraduiertenförderung Baden-Württemberg”.
Appendix: The signum operator
Appendix: The signum operator
In this appendix we shortly recall some facts about the signum operator on complex Banach lattices which are needed in the article. First we recall the following result from [3, Section C-I.8]:
Proposition A.1
Let E be a complex Banach lattice and let \(f \in E {\setminus } \{0\}\). Then there exists a unique linear operator \(S_f\) on \(E_{|f|}\) which fulfils the following two conditions:
-
(a)
\(S_f \overline{f} = |f|\), where \(\overline{f}\) denotes the complex conjugate vector of f.
-
(b)
\(|S_fg| \le |g|\) for all \(g \in E_{|f|}\).
The operator \(S_f\) is called the signum operator associated to \(E_f\). If we identify \(E_{|f|}\) with a \(C(K;\mathbb {C})\)-space (K compact) by means of the Kakutani representation theorem such that |f| corresponds to the constant 1-function on K, then we have \(S_{f}g = fg\) for each \(g \in C(K;\mathbb {C})\) where the multiplication is computed in \(C(K;\mathbb {C})\). Now we come to the major definition in this appendix (compare [3, Definitions B-III.2.2(b) and C-III.2.1]).
Definition A.2
Let E be a complex Banach lattice and let \(f \in E {\setminus } \{0\}\). By means of the Kakutani representation theorem we can identify the principal ideal \(E_{|f|}\) with a \(C(K;\mathbb {C})\)-space for some compact Hausdorff-space K such that |f| corresponds to the constant 1-function on K. Using the multiplication on \(C(K;\mathbb {C})\), we define \(f^{[n]} := f^n\) for each \(n \in \mathbb {Z}\).
Note that \(f^{[n]} = S_f^n |f|\) whenever \(n \ge 0\) and \(f^{[n]} = S_{\overline{f}}^n |f|\) whenever \(n < 0\). This shows that the definition of \(f^{[n]}\) is independent of the choice of the representation \(E \xrightarrow {\sim } C(K;\mathbb {C})\). The following property of \(f^{[n]}\) is important:
Proposition A.3
Let E be a complex Banach lattice and let \(f \in E {\setminus } \{0\}\). Suppose that \(h \in E_+\) with \(f \in E_h\) and identify the principal ideal \(E_h\) with a \(C(K;\mathbb {C})\)-space for some compact Hausdorff space K, where h corresponds to the constant 1-function on K. In the space \(C(K; \mathbb {C})\) the vectors \(f^{[n]}\) are given by
Proof
First, let \(n \in \mathbb {N}_0\). Define an operator \(\tilde{S}_{f}\) on \(E_{|f|} = C(K;\mathbb {C})_{|f|}\) which is given by
for every \(g \in C(K;\mathbb {C})_{|f|}\) and every \(x \in K\). Then \(\tilde{S}_f\) fulfils properties (a) and (b) from Proposition A.1 and we thus have \(\tilde{S}_f = S_f\). This implies \(f^{[n]} = S_f^n |f| = \tilde{S}_f^n |f|\), which proves the assertion. For \(n < 0\) one argues similarly, using the operators \(\tilde{S}_{\overline{f}}\) and \(S_{\overline{f}}\) instead. \(\square \)
We can now prove the following lemma which is a slight modification of [3, Lemma C-III.3.11].
Lemma A.4
Let E be a complex Banach lattice and let \(G,H \subset E\) be to vector subspaces of E. Let \(n \in \mathbb {Z}\) and assume that \(f^{[n]} \in H\) for each \(f \in G {\setminus } \{0\}\). Then \(\dim G \le \dim H\).
Proof
The proof is very similar to the proof of [3, Lemma C-III.3.11]; for the convenience of the reader, we include it here. Let \(0 < m \le \dim G\), let \(g_1,\ldots ,g_m\) be linearly independent elements of G and define \(u := |g_1| + \cdots + |g_m|\). Then we can identify the principal ideal \(E_u\) with a \(C( K; \mathbb {C})\)-space. There are points \(x_1,\ldots ,x_m \in K\) and functions \(f_1,\ldots ,f_m \in C(K;\mathbb {C})\) with the same linear span as \(g_1,\ldots ,g_m\) which have the property that \(f_j(x_k) = \delta _{jk}\) (where \(\delta _{jk}\) is the Dirac delta) for all \(j,k \in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\); this can easily be seen by an induction over m. By our assumption, we have \(f_j^{[n]} \in H\) for all \(j \in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\) and due to Proposition A.3 we can compute \(f_j^{[n]}\) in \(C(K;\mathbb {C})\) by means of formula (1). Hence, we also have \(f_j^{[n]}(x_k) = \delta _{jk}\) for all \(j,k \in \{1,\ldots ,m\}\) and therefore, the vectors \(f_1^{[n]},\ldots ,f_m^{[n]}\) are linearly independent. Thus \(m \le \dim H\), which proves the assertion. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glück, J. On the peripheral spectrum of positive operators. Positivity 20, 307–336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11117-015-0357-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11117-015-0357-1
Keywords
- Positive operator
- Perron-Frobenius theory
- Peripheral spectrum
- Peripheral point spectrum
- Cyclic
- Growth condition