Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disentangling the relationship between immigration and environmental emissions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immigrants have historically been accused of being unassimilable, responsible for driving down wages, taking jobs away from native workers, and disproportionately drawing benefits from education, health care, and social services. With environmental concerns gaining more traction, they have also been blamed for contributing to climate change. Previous empirical contributions, however, have suggested that immigration may actually improve air quality, but their findings have been largely based on cross-sectional data and estimations not addressing endogeneity between immigration and environmental emissions and between income and emissions. This study provides a more compelling and accurate disentangling of the link between immigration and environmental emissions by using panel US state-level data over the 1997–2014 period and by controlling for endogeneity, other confounding factors, and spatial variation. It presents evidence of a negative and bidirectional link between the share of immigrants and emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O. These findings suggest that immigration may indeed yield environmental benefits and that environmental quality may represent an important factor or amenity influencing immigration flows. Future research should build on these results to further identify and assess all potential immigration-emissions pathways, ideally using more disaggregated data while taking into account potential generational variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This score was developed by Corporate Knights and related data are available at https://bit.ly/30N4OPS.

References

  • Abizadeh, S., & Ghalam, N.Z. (1994). Immigrants and Canadian-born: a consumption behaviour assessment. Social Indicators Research, 32(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albouy, D., Cho, H., & Shappo, M. (2019). Immigration and the pursuit of amenities. Journal of Regional Science Forthcoming.

  • Anderson, S. (2016). Immigrants and billion dollar startups. National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP).

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: problems and solutions. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations, pp. 93–117.

  • Atiles, J.H., & Bohon, S.A. (2003). Camas calientes: housing adjustments and barriers to social and economic adaptation among Georgia’s rural Latinos. Southern Rural Sociology, 19(1), 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Been, V. (1994). Locally undesirable land uses in minority neighborhoods: disproportionate siting or market dynamics?. Yale Law Journal, 103 (6), 1383–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, E., & Smart, M. (2014). Brother can you spare a ride? Carpooling in immigrant neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 51(9), 1871–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohon, S.A., Stamps, K., & Atiles, J.H. (2008). Transportation and migrant adjustment in Georgia. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G.J. (2001). Does immigration grease the wheels of the labor market?. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2001(1), 69–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R.D. (1993). Anatomy of environmental racism and the environmental justice movement. Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots, 15, 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R.D. (2008). Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R.D., Warren, R.C., & Johnson, G.S. (2005). The quest for environmental justice. Geneva: Human Rights and the politics of pollution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J.C. (1998). Population growth and air quality in California. Demography, 35(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., & Rosa, E.A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1, 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D.A. (1979). Residential preferences, quality of life, and the population turnaround. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 960–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R., & Holdren, J.P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A., & Rose, A.K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87 (1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garling, S. (1998). Immigration policy and the environment: the Washington DC metropolitan area. Population & Environment, 20(1), 23–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H., & Abrams, J. (2011). Amenity migration: diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, 76(4), 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, M.P., & Field, V. (2010). Katrina in historical context: environment and migration in the US. Population and Environment, 31(1-3), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, J.F., & O’Brien, E. (2014). Race, ethnicity, gender, and class: the sociology of group conflict and change. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C.t., & Liu, B.c. (1983). The pursuance of better quality of life: in the long run, better quality of social life is the most important factor in migration. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 42(4), 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. (1996). Environmental concerns and international migration. International Migration Review, 30(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M. (1998). The association between environmental risk and internal migration flows. Population and Environment, 19(3), 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M. (2000a). A comparison of the environmental attitudes, concern, and behaviors of native-born and foreign-born us residents. Population & Environment, 21(6), 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M. (2000b). The spatial association between us immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. International Migration Review, 34(2), 460–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26(4), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L.M., & Nawrotzki, R. (2016). Migration and the environment. In International Handbook of Migration and Population Distribution (pp. 465–484). New York: Springer.

  • Ivanova, I. (2017). Immigrants’ impact on the U.S. economy in 7 charts. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/immigrants-impact-on-the-u-s-economy-in-7-charts/.

  • Johnson, K.M., & Lichter, D.T. (2008). Natural increase: a new source of population growth in emerging hispanic destinations in the United States. Population and Development Review, 34(2), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketokivi, M., & McIntosh, C.N. (2017). Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Operations Management, 52, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocker, N., & Head, L. (2013). Diversifying ethnicity in Australia’s population and environment debates. Australian Geographer, 44(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C.E. (2009). Social disorganization theory: then, now, and in the future. In Handbook on Crime and Deviance (pp. 225–236). New York: Springer.

  • Laurian, L., & Funderburg, R. (2014). Environmental justice in France? A spatio-temporal analysis of incinerator location. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(3), 424–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.T., & Martinez, R. Jr. (2002). Social disorganization revisited: mapping the recent immigration and black homicide relationship in northern Miami. Sociological Focus, 35(4), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.Y.C., & Liscow, Z.D. (2013). Endogeneity in the environmental Kuznets curve: an instrumental variables approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2), 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, G., & Bialik, K. (2017). Key findings about US immigrants. Pew Research Center, p. 3.

  • Lu, G., Ding, X.D., Peng, D.X., & Chuang, H.H.C. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in operations management research: recent developments, common problems, and directions for future research. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G., & Hofmann, E.T. (2019a). Immigration and environment in the US: a spatial study of air quality. The Social Science Journal, 56(1), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G., & Hofmann, E.T. (2019b). Population, immigration, and air quality in the USA: a spatial panel study. Population and Environment, 40(3), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S., Walker, C., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2019). It’s what I’ve always done: continuity and change in the household sustainability practices of Somali immigrants in the UK. Geoforum, 107, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T.R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. St. Paul’s Church-yard.

  • Matsuo, M. (2016). Gender differences in mobility of hispanic immigrants. Transport Policy, 52, 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, F.A. (2001). Replacement migration: a questionable tactic for delaying the inevitable effects of fertility transition. Population & Environment, 22(4), 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard, J., Pedersen, K.A., & Wien, M. (2000). Impact of household consumption on CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 22(4), 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R. (2006). Immigration and the environment: underlying values and scope of analysis. Ecological Economics, 59(2), 208–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (2002). Environmental refugees: a growing phenomenon of the 21st century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 357(1420), 609–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2006). The environment: One more reason to keep immigrants out?. Ecological Economics, 59(2), 204–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, pp. 1417–1426.

  • Parsons, J. (2000). The salience of number-power: an idea whose time has come?. Population & Environment, 21(5), 477–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peri, G. (2013). The economic benefits of immigration. Berkeley Review of Latin American Studies Fall, pp. 14–19.

  • Pew Charitable Trusts. (2014). Changing patterns in us immigration and population: immigrants slow population decline in many countries. Philadelphia: December https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issuebriefs/2014/12/changing-patterns-in-us-immigration-and-population.

  • Pfeffer, M.J., & Stycos, J.M. (2002). Immigrant environmental behaviors in new york city. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R.G. (2014). Immigrant America: a portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C.E., & Feldmeyer, B. (2012). The environmental impact of immigration: an analysis of the effects of immigrant concentration on air pollution levels. Population Research and Policy Review, 31(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V., & Feng, Y. (2009). Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Atmospheric Environment, 43 (1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuveny, R. (2007). Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 656–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røpke, I. (2006). Migration and sustainability - compatible or contradictory?. Ecological Economics, 59(2), 191–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, I., & Vargas-Silva, C. (2018). Differences in labour market outcomes between natives, refugees and other migrants in the UK. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(4), 855–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokhna, N.P. (2019). Immigrés et natifs en france: une analyse des comportements de consommation. Economie Prevision, (1),29–63.

  • Squalli, J. (2009). Immigration and environmental emissions: a US county-level analysis. Population and Environment, 30(6), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squalli, J. (2010). An empirical assessment of US state-level immigration and environmental emissions. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1170–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squalli, J. (2014). Intelligence and environmental emissions. Intelligence, 44, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J.H. (2001). Instrumental variables in statistics and econometrics. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 7577–7582.

  • Svart, L.M. (1976). Environmental preference migration: a review. Geographical Review, pp. 314–330.

  • Ullman, E.L. (1954). Amenities as a factor in regional growth. Geographical Review, 44(1), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viel, J.F., Hägi, M., Upegui, E., & Laurian, L. (2011). Environmental justice in a French industrial region: are polluting industrial facilities equally distributed?. Health & Place, 17(1), 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigdor, J.L. (2017). Immigration, housing markets, and community vitality. Cato Journal, 37(3), 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K., Hamza, M., Oliver-Smith, A., Renaud, F., & Julca, A. (2010). Climate change, environmental degradation and migration. Natural Hazards, 55(3), 689–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRI. (2015). CAIT climate data explorer-US state GHG emissions documentation. Washington: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E.A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., & Theil, H. (1962). Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 29, 54–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is sincerely grateful to three anonymous reviewers and Elizabeth Fussell for suggestions that have greatly improved the paper. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not reflect those of the American University of Sharjah. All remaining errors are the author’s own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Squalli.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Squalli, J. Disentangling the relationship between immigration and environmental emissions. Popul Environ 43, 1–21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00369-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00369-z

Keywords

Navigation