Skip to main content
Log in

Suprasellar pituitary adenomas: a 10-year experience in a single tertiary medical center and a literature review

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Suprasellar pituitary adenomas (SPAs) are a special type of pituitary adenoma. Although dozens of SPA cases have been reported, the exact definition and the characteristics of SPA have not been exhaustively discussed before.

Methods

In a retrospective electronic medical records review, 13 patients with SPA were identified in our hospital between January 2010 and December 2019. A literature review was performed by searching the online database PubMed, and 39 cases conformed to the criteria based on the previous literature. Data regarding clinical symptoms, imaging manifestations, surgical information and follow-ups were analyzed.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis of 52 patients with SPA was 36.73 years, and most of the patients were female (61.5%). The most common hormone-secreting subtypes of SPA were nonfunctioning (36.5%) and ACTH-secreting (34.6%) SPA. Macroadenomas (68.9%) were more common than microadenomas (31.1%). The origins of the SPAs included the intrasellar pituitary gland (type I), the subdiaphragmatic (type IIa) and supradiaphragmatic (type IIb) part of the pituitary stalk, and the suprasellar peri-infundibular region (type III). The most common anatomic subtype of SPA was type III, and type IIb was also common. The most common presentations of SPA were visual symptoms, especially for type III SPA. In addition, 64.7% and 73.1% of type IIb and III SPAs, respectively, were suspected to be of suprasellar origin based on presurgical imaging examination. Patients with tumors of suspected suprasellar origin were more likely to receive transcranial surgery (TCS) initially than those with tumors of suspected intrasellar origin (70.6% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0013). The intact rate for the pituitary stalk after surgery for type II SPA was lower than that for type I and III SPA (52.6% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.0036). More patients with type II SPA experienced postoperative central diabetes insipidus (CDI) than those with type I and III SPA (57.9% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.0011). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative CDI between transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) and TCS (p = 0.1304). Nine patients in our hospital received extended endoscopic TSS; only one experienced tumor recurrence, and no severe complications occurred after surgery.

Conclusions

SPAs could be defined as pituitary adenomas completely or partially located in the suprasellar region. There were both similarities and differences among the different anatomic subtypes of SPA. For patients who were suspected of having SPAs, visual field tests, pituitary hormone evaluation and MRI were necessary. Because imaging examination is not a reliable method, surgery is the only way to confirm the tumor origin. Extended endoscopic TSS might be a safe and efficient approach to remove these tumors, but more studies are needed to verify this conclusion. For type II SPA, the pituitary stalk should be carefully protected during surgery, and postoperative CDI should be monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SPA:

Suprasellar pituitary adenoma

EPA:

Ectopic pituitary adenoma

ACTH:

Adrenocorticotrophic hormone

GH:

Growth hormone

TSH:

Thyroid stimulating hormone

PRL:

Prolactin

DS:

Diaphragma sellae

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

Computed tomography

TCS:

Transcranial surgery

TSS:

Transsphenoidal surgery

UFC:

Urine free cortisol

DST:

Dexamethasone suppression test

IPSS:

Inferior petrosal sinus sampling

References

  1. Mete O et al (2017) Overview of the 2017 WHO Classification of pituitary tumors. Endocr Pathol 28(3):228–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sav A et al (2015) Invasive, atypical and aggressive pituitary adenomas and carcinomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 44(1):99–104

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tajudeen BA et al (2017) Ectopic pituitary adenomas presenting as sphenoid or clival lesions: case series and management recommendations. J Neurol Surg B 78(2):120–124

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ogilvy KM et al (1973) Intracranial dissemination of pituitary adenomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36(2):199–205

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothman LM et al (1976) Intracranial ectopic pituitary adenoma. Case report. J Neurosurg 44(1):96–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colohan AR et al (1987) Ectopic pituitary gland simulating a suprasellar tumor. Neurosurgery 20(1):43–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamada J et al (1990) Suprasellar pituitary adenoma arising from the pars tuberalis: case report. Neurosurgery 27(4):647–649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwai Y et al (1990) A case of ectopic large pituitary adenoma. No Shinkei Geka 18(1):71–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK et al (1990) Ectopic pituitary adenoma of the third ventricle. Case report. J Neurosurg 72(1):139–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumura A et al (1990) Suprasellar ectopic pituitary adenoma: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 26(4):681–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tamaki N et al (1991) Ectopic pituitary adenoma in the suprasellar cistern: case report. Surg Neurol 35(5):389–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luk KH et al (1992) Suprasellar ectopic pituitary adenoma presenting as cranial diabetes insipidus. Postgrad Med J 68(800):467–469

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindboe CF et al (1993) ACTH and TSH producing ectopic suprasellar pituitary adenoma of the hypothalamic region: case report. Clin Neuropathol 12(3):138–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tal A (1993) Cushing’s disease caused by ectopic pituitary adenoma within the pituitary stalk. South Med J 86(2):249–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dyer EH et al (1994) Functioning ectopic supradiaphragmatic pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 34(3):529–32 (discussion 532)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohno M et al (1994) Suprasellar ectopic pituitary adenoma–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 34(8):538–542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka T et al (1994) Suprasellar ectopic pituitary adenoma: report of a case. No Shinkei Geka 22(12):1141–1145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akimoto J et al (1995) Cystic ectopic pituitary adenoma: report of a case. No To Shinkei 47(11):1092–1097

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takahata T et al (1995) Ectopic pituitary adenoma occurring in the interpeduncular cistern. Case report. J Neurosurg 83(6):1092–1094

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason RB et al (1997) Selective excision of adenomas originating in or extending into the pituitary stalk with preservation of pituitary function. J Neurosurg 87(3):343–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagatani T et al (1997) Suprasellar ectopic pituitary adenoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(1):94–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung S et al (2000) Supradiaphragmatic ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenoma. Pathol Int 50(11):901–904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hou L et al (2002) Suprasellar adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting ectopic pituitary adenoma: case report and literature review. Neurosurgery 50(3):618–625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ueda R et al (2003) Suprasellar peri-infundibular ectopic prolactinoma—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43(1):51–54

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peker S et al (2005) Ectopic pituitary adenoma located at the pituitary stalk. Case report. J Neurosurg Sci 49(1):25–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caranci F et al (2007) Ectopic suprasellar pituitary adenoma. A case report. Neuroradiol J 19(6):731–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dam-Hieu P et al (2007) Management of ACTH-secreting supradiaphragmatic adenomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109(8):698–704

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guerrero CA et al (2007) Ectopic suprasellar growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma: case report. Neurosurgery 61(4):E879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. So G et al (2008) Nonfunctioning suprasellar ectopic pituitary adenoma. A case report. No Shinkei Geka 36(12):1121–1125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mizutani A et al (2009) Asymptomatic non-functioning ectopic pituitary adenoma in the suprasellar region: a case report. Br J Neurosurg 23(3):321–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kinoshita Y et al (2012) Supra-diaphragmatic pituitary adenoma removed through the trans-tuberculum sellae approach. Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 52(2):91–95

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fuminari K et al (2015) Extended endoscopic endonasal surgery using three-dimensional endoscopy in the intra-operative MRI suite for supra-diaphragmatic ectopic pituitary adenoma. Turk Neurosurg 25(3):503–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Q et al (2016) Ectopic suprasellar thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenoma: case report and literature review. World Neurosurg 95:617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou HJ et al (2017) ’Ectopic’ suprasellar type IIa PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma. Pituitary 20(4):477–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hanaoka Y et al (2018) Calcified ectopic TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma mimicking craniopharyngioma: a rare case report and literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160(10):2001–2005

    Google Scholar 

  36. Melmed S (2020) Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. N Engl J Med 382(10):937–950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mehta GU et al (2017) Management of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurooncology 19(6):762–773

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Molitch ME (2017) Diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas: a review. Jama 317(5):516–524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Famini P et al (2011) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(6):1633–1641

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. BM A et al (2000) The dominant role of increased intrasellar pressure in the pathogenesis of hypopituitarism, hyperprolactinemia, and headaches in patients with pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(5):1789–1793

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vilar L et al (2008) Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia: results of a Brazilian multicenter study with 1234 patients. J Endocrinol Investig 31(5):436–444

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Turcu AF et al (2013) Pituitary stalk lesions: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(5):1812–1818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mahajan A et al (2020) Diagnosis and management of pituitary disease with focus on the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Endocrine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02242-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vasilev V et al (2016) Management of endocrine disease: pituitary ‘incidentaloma’: neuroradiological assessment and differential diagnosis. Eur J Endocrinol 175(4):R171–R184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bresson D et al (2016) Sellar lesions/pathology. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 49(1):63–93

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fomichev D et al (2016) Extended transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal surgery of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 94:181–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cappabianca P et al (2015) Endoscopic endonasal extended approaches for the management of large pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 26(3):323–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim YH et al (2017) Endoscopic endonasal approach for suprasellar lesions in children: complications and prevention. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60(3):315–321

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou X et al (2019) Etiological spectrum and pattern of change in pituitary stalk thickening: experience in 321 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104(8):3419–3427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Di Iorgi N et al (2012) Diabetes insipidus—diagnosis and management. Horm Res Paediatr 77(2):69–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science (CAMS-2016-I2M-1-002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y. et al. Suprasellar pituitary adenomas: a 10-year experience in a single tertiary medical center and a literature review. Pituitary 23, 367–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01043-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01043-1

Keywords

Navigation