Skip to main content
Log in

Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Recent studies suggest using lower GH cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test (GST) in diagnosing adult GH deficiency (GHD), especially in obese patients. There are limited data on evaluating GH and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axes using weight-based dosing for the GST.

Objective

To define GH and cortisol cut-points to diagnose adult GHD and secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) using the GST, and to compare fixed-dose (FD: 1 or 1.5 mg in patients >90 kg) with weight-based dosing (WB: 0.03 mg/kg). Response to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) was considered the gold standard, using GH and cortisol cut-points of ≥3 ng/ml and ≥18 µg/dL, respectively.

Design

28 Patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and 1–2 (n = 14) or ≥3 (n = 14) pituitary hormone deficiencies, and 14 control subjects matched for age, sex, estrogen status and body mass index (BMI) underwent the ITT, FD- and WB-GST in random order.

Results

Age, sex ratio and BMI were comparable between the three groups. The best GH cut-point for diagnosis of GHD was 1.0 (92 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity) and 2.0 ng/mL (96 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) for FD- and WB-GST, respectively. Age negatively correlated with peak GH during FD-GST (r = −0.32, P = 0.04), but not WB-GST. The best cortisol cut-point for diagnosis of SAI was 8.8 µg/dL (92 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity) and 11.2 µg/dL (92 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) for FD-GST and WB-GST, respectively. Nausea was the most common side effect, and one patient had a seizure during the FD-GST.

Conclusion

The GST correctly classified GHD using GH cut-points of 1 ng/ml for FD-GST and 2 ng/ml for WB-GST, hence using 3 ng/ml as the GH cut-point will misclassify some GH-sufficient adults. The GST may also be an acceptable alternative to the ITT for evaluating the HPA axis utilizing cortisol cut-points of 9 µg/dL for FD-GST and 11 µg/dL for WB-GST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho KK (2007) Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency II: a statement of the GH Research Society in association with the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Lawson Wilkins Society, European Society of Endocrinology, Japan Endocrine Society, and Endocrine Society of Australia. Eur J Endocrinol 157(6):695–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Molitch ME, Clemmons DR, Malozowski S, Merriam GR, Shalet SM, Vance ML, Stephens PA (2006) Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(5):1621–1634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartman ML, Crowe BJ, Biller BM, Ho KK, Clemmons DR, Chipman JJ (2002) Which patients do not require a GH stimulation test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(2):477–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johannsson G (2007) Management of adult growth hormone deficiency. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 36(1):203–220. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2006.11.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuen KC, Biller BM, Molitch ME, Cook DM (2009) Clinical review: Is lack of recombinant growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone in the United States a setback or time to consider glucagon testing for adult GH deficiency? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(8):2702–2707. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Molitch ME, Clemmons DR, Malozowski S, Merriam GR, Vance ML, Endocrine S (2011) Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(6):1587–1609. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook DM, Yuen KC, Biller BM, Kemp SF, Vance ML (2009) American Association of Clinical, E.: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for growth hormone use in growth hormone-deficient adults and transition patients—2009 update. Endocr Pract 15(2):1–29. doi:10.4158/EP.15.S2.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomez JM, Espadero RM, Escobar-Jimenez F, Hawkins F, Pico A, Herrera-Pombo JL, Vilardell E, Duran A, Mesa J, Faure E, Sanmarti A (2002) Growth hormone release after glucagon as a reliable test of growth hormone assessment in adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 56(3):329–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Conceicao FL, da Costa e Silva A, Leal Costa AJ, Vaisman M (2003) Glucagon stimulation test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. J Endocrinol Invest 26(11):1065–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dichtel LE, Yuen KC, Bredella MA, Gerweck AV, Russell BM, Riccio AD, Gurel MH, Sluss PM, Biller BM, Miller KK (2014) Overweight/Obese adults with pituitary disorders require lower peak growth hormone cutoff values on glucagon stimulation testing to avoid overdiagnosis of growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(12):4712–4719. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuen KC, Biller BM, Katznelson L, Rhoads SA, Gurel MH, Chu O, Corazzini V, Spiller K, Gordon MB, Salvatori R, Cook DM (2013) Clinical characteristics, timing of peak responses and safety aspects of two dosing regimens of the glucagon stimulation test in evaluating growth hormone and cortisol secretion in adults. Pituitary 16(2):220–230. doi:10.1007/s11102-012-0407-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diri H, Karaca Z, Simsek Y, Tanriverdi F, Unluhizarci K, Selcuklu A, Kelestimur F (2015) Can a glucagon stimulation test characterized by lower GH cut-off value be used for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults? Pituitary 18(6):884–892. doi:10.1007/s11102-015-0666-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Micmacher E, Assumpcao RP, Redorat RG, Spina LD, Cruz IC, Silva CA, Vaisman M, Conceicao FL (2009) Growth hormone secretion in response to glucagon stimulation test in healthy middle-aged men. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia 53(7):853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agha A, Rogers B, Mylotte D, Taleb F, Tormey W, Phillips J, Thompson CJ (2004) Neuroendocrine dysfunction in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 60(5):584–591. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02023.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arvat E, Maccagno B, Ramunni J, Maccario M, Giordano R, Broglio F, Camanni F, Ghigo E (2000) Interaction between glucagon and human corticotropin-releasing hormone or vasopressin on ACTH and cortisol secretion in humans. Eur J Endocrinol 143(1):99–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leong KS, Walker AB, Martin I, Wile D, Wilding J, MacFarlane IA (2001) An audit of 500 subcutaneous glucagon stimulation tests to assess growth hormone and ACTH secretion in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54(4):463–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Littley MD, Gibson S, White A, Shalet SM (1989) Comparison of the ACTH and cortisol responses to provocative testing with glucagon and insulin hypoglycaemia in normal subjects. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 31(5):527–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Orme SM, Peacey SR, Barth JH, Belchetz PE (1996) Comparison of tests of stress-released cortisol secretion in pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45(2):135–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Orme SM, Price A, Weetman AP, Ross RJ (1998) Comparison of the diagnostic utility of the simplified and standard i.m. glucagon stimulation test (IMGST). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 49(6):773–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao RH, Spathis GS (1987) Intramuscular glucagon as a provocative stimulus for the assessment of pituitary function: growth hormone and cortisol responses. Metabolism 36(7):658–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spathis GS, Bloom SR, Jeffcoate WJ, Millar JG, Kurtz A, Pyasena MR, Smith JA, Nabarro JD (1974) Subcutaneous glucagon as a test of the ability of the pituitary to secrete GH and ACTH. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 3(2):175–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Waldhausl W, Haydl H, Nowotny P (1976) ACTH and cortisol responses to glucagon stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 43(3):675–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berg C, Meinel T, Lahner H, Yuece A, Mann K, Petersenn S (2010) Diagnostic utility of the glucagon stimulation test in comparison to the insulin tolerance test in patients following pituitary surgery. Eur J Endocrinol 162(3):477–482. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simsek Y, Karaca Z, Tanriverdi F, Unluhizarci K, Selcuklu A, Kelestimur F (2015) A comparison of low-dose ACTH, glucagon stimulation and insulin tolerance test in patients with pituitary disorders. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 82(1):45–52. doi:10.1111/cen.12528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Verhelst J, Abs R (2009) Cardiovascular risk factors in hypopituitary GH-deficient adults. Eur J Endocrinol 161(Suppl 1):S41–S49. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Corneli G, Di Somma C, Baldelli R, Rovere S, Gasco V, Croce CG, Grottoli S, Maccario M, Colao A, Lombardi G, Ghigo E, Camanni F, Aimaretti G (2005) The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index. Eur J Endocrinol 153(2):257–264. doi:10.1530/eje.1.01967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karaca Z, Lale A, Tanriverdi F, Kula M, Unluhizarci K, Kelestimur F (2011) The comparison of low and standard dose ACTH and glucagon stimulation tests in the evaluation of hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis in healthy adults. Pituitary 14(2):134–140. doi:10.1007/s11102-010-0270-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mukherjee JJ, de Castro JJ, Kaltsas G, Afshar F, Grossman AB, Wass JA, Besser GM (1997) A comparison of the insulin tolerance/glucagon test with the short ACTH stimulation test in the assessment of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis in the early post-operative period after hypophysectomy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47(1):51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reimondo G, Bovio S, Allasino B, Terzolo M, Angeli A (2008) Secondary hypoadrenalism. Pituitary 11(2):147–154. doi:10.1007/s11102-008-0108-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tavares AB, Seixas-da-Silva IA, Silvestre DH, Paixao CM Jr, Vaisman M, Conceicao FL (2015) Potential risks of glucagon stimulation test in elderly people. Growth Horm IGF Res 25(1):53–56. doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2014.11.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. di Iorgi N, Napoli F, Allegri A, Secco A, Calandra E, Calcagno A, Frassinetti C, Ghezzi M, Ambrosini L, Parodi S, Gastaldi R, Loche S, Maghnie M (2010) The accuracy of the glucagon test compared to the insulin tolerance test in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in young children with growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(5):2132–2139. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Secco A, di Iorgi N, Napoli F, Calandra E, Ghezzi M, Frassinetti C, Parodi S, Casini MR, Lorini R, Loche S, Maghnie M (2009) The glucagon test in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children with short stature younger than 6 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(11):4251–4257. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bidlingmaier M (2008) Problems with GH assays and strategies toward standardization. Eur J Endocrinol 159(Suppl 1):S41–S44. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Junnila RK, Strasburger CJ, Bidlingmaier M (2015) Pitfalls of insulin-like growth factor-i and growth hormone assays. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 44(1):27–34. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2014.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pokrajac A, Wark G, Ellis AR, Wear J, Wieringa GE, Trainer PJ (2007) Variation in GH and IGF-I assays limits the applicability of international consensus criteria to local practice. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 67(1):65–70. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02836.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Manjula Gupta for her assistance with running hormonal assays at Cleveland Clinic. We thank Robert Weil, Stacy Leg, Kellie Spiller and Ann Minnock for their assistance with dynamic tests. We acknowledge the partial support by the Clinical Research Center and its staff at Cleveland Clinic through the Case Western Reserve University/Cleveland Clinic CTSA Grant Number UL1TR000439 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCATS or NIH.

Funding

This study was partially supported by a Grant from Novo Nordisk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir H. Hamrahian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JB has nothing to declare. AHH received research Grant from Novo Nordisk and had received consulting honoraria from Versartis. KJP-H has received consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk. KCJY and BMKB had received research Grants from Novo Nordisk, OPKO and Versartis and consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Versartis. MBG has received research Grants from OPKO, Novo Nordisk, Teva and Pfizer and consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamrahian, A.H., Yuen, K.C.J., Gordon, M.B. et al. Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study. Pituitary 19, 332–341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7

Keywords

Navigation