Abstract
Context
Recent studies suggest using lower GH cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test (GST) in diagnosing adult GH deficiency (GHD), especially in obese patients. There are limited data on evaluating GH and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axes using weight-based dosing for the GST.
Objective
To define GH and cortisol cut-points to diagnose adult GHD and secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) using the GST, and to compare fixed-dose (FD: 1 or 1.5 mg in patients >90 kg) with weight-based dosing (WB: 0.03 mg/kg). Response to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) was considered the gold standard, using GH and cortisol cut-points of ≥3 ng/ml and ≥18 µg/dL, respectively.
Design
28 Patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and 1–2 (n = 14) or ≥3 (n = 14) pituitary hormone deficiencies, and 14 control subjects matched for age, sex, estrogen status and body mass index (BMI) underwent the ITT, FD- and WB-GST in random order.
Results
Age, sex ratio and BMI were comparable between the three groups. The best GH cut-point for diagnosis of GHD was 1.0 (92 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity) and 2.0 ng/mL (96 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) for FD- and WB-GST, respectively. Age negatively correlated with peak GH during FD-GST (r = −0.32, P = 0.04), but not WB-GST. The best cortisol cut-point for diagnosis of SAI was 8.8 µg/dL (92 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity) and 11.2 µg/dL (92 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) for FD-GST and WB-GST, respectively. Nausea was the most common side effect, and one patient had a seizure during the FD-GST.
Conclusion
The GST correctly classified GHD using GH cut-points of 1 ng/ml for FD-GST and 2 ng/ml for WB-GST, hence using 3 ng/ml as the GH cut-point will misclassify some GH-sufficient adults. The GST may also be an acceptable alternative to the ITT for evaluating the HPA axis utilizing cortisol cut-points of 9 µg/dL for FD-GST and 11 µg/dL for WB-GST.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ho KK (2007) Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency II: a statement of the GH Research Society in association with the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Lawson Wilkins Society, European Society of Endocrinology, Japan Endocrine Society, and Endocrine Society of Australia. Eur J Endocrinol 157(6):695–700
Molitch ME, Clemmons DR, Malozowski S, Merriam GR, Shalet SM, Vance ML, Stephens PA (2006) Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(5):1621–1634
Hartman ML, Crowe BJ, Biller BM, Ho KK, Clemmons DR, Chipman JJ (2002) Which patients do not require a GH stimulation test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(2):477–485
Johannsson G (2007) Management of adult growth hormone deficiency. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 36(1):203–220. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2006.11.012
Yuen KC, Biller BM, Molitch ME, Cook DM (2009) Clinical review: Is lack of recombinant growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone in the United States a setback or time to consider glucagon testing for adult GH deficiency? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(8):2702–2707. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0299
Molitch ME, Clemmons DR, Malozowski S, Merriam GR, Vance ML, Endocrine S (2011) Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(6):1587–1609. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0179
Cook DM, Yuen KC, Biller BM, Kemp SF, Vance ML (2009) American Association of Clinical, E.: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for growth hormone use in growth hormone-deficient adults and transition patients—2009 update. Endocr Pract 15(2):1–29. doi:10.4158/EP.15.S2.1
Gomez JM, Espadero RM, Escobar-Jimenez F, Hawkins F, Pico A, Herrera-Pombo JL, Vilardell E, Duran A, Mesa J, Faure E, Sanmarti A (2002) Growth hormone release after glucagon as a reliable test of growth hormone assessment in adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 56(3):329–334
Conceicao FL, da Costa e Silva A, Leal Costa AJ, Vaisman M (2003) Glucagon stimulation test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. J Endocrinol Invest 26(11):1065–1070
Dichtel LE, Yuen KC, Bredella MA, Gerweck AV, Russell BM, Riccio AD, Gurel MH, Sluss PM, Biller BM, Miller KK (2014) Overweight/Obese adults with pituitary disorders require lower peak growth hormone cutoff values on glucagon stimulation testing to avoid overdiagnosis of growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(12):4712–4719. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2830
Yuen KC, Biller BM, Katznelson L, Rhoads SA, Gurel MH, Chu O, Corazzini V, Spiller K, Gordon MB, Salvatori R, Cook DM (2013) Clinical characteristics, timing of peak responses and safety aspects of two dosing regimens of the glucagon stimulation test in evaluating growth hormone and cortisol secretion in adults. Pituitary 16(2):220–230. doi:10.1007/s11102-012-0407-7
Diri H, Karaca Z, Simsek Y, Tanriverdi F, Unluhizarci K, Selcuklu A, Kelestimur F (2015) Can a glucagon stimulation test characterized by lower GH cut-off value be used for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults? Pituitary 18(6):884–892. doi:10.1007/s11102-015-0666-1
Micmacher E, Assumpcao RP, Redorat RG, Spina LD, Cruz IC, Silva CA, Vaisman M, Conceicao FL (2009) Growth hormone secretion in response to glucagon stimulation test in healthy middle-aged men. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia 53(7):853–858
Agha A, Rogers B, Mylotte D, Taleb F, Tormey W, Phillips J, Thompson CJ (2004) Neuroendocrine dysfunction in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 60(5):584–591. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02023.x
Arvat E, Maccagno B, Ramunni J, Maccario M, Giordano R, Broglio F, Camanni F, Ghigo E (2000) Interaction between glucagon and human corticotropin-releasing hormone or vasopressin on ACTH and cortisol secretion in humans. Eur J Endocrinol 143(1):99–104
Leong KS, Walker AB, Martin I, Wile D, Wilding J, MacFarlane IA (2001) An audit of 500 subcutaneous glucagon stimulation tests to assess growth hormone and ACTH secretion in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54(4):463–468
Littley MD, Gibson S, White A, Shalet SM (1989) Comparison of the ACTH and cortisol responses to provocative testing with glucagon and insulin hypoglycaemia in normal subjects. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 31(5):527–533
Orme SM, Peacey SR, Barth JH, Belchetz PE (1996) Comparison of tests of stress-released cortisol secretion in pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45(2):135–140
Orme SM, Price A, Weetman AP, Ross RJ (1998) Comparison of the diagnostic utility of the simplified and standard i.m. glucagon stimulation test (IMGST). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 49(6):773–778
Rao RH, Spathis GS (1987) Intramuscular glucagon as a provocative stimulus for the assessment of pituitary function: growth hormone and cortisol responses. Metabolism 36(7):658–663
Spathis GS, Bloom SR, Jeffcoate WJ, Millar JG, Kurtz A, Pyasena MR, Smith JA, Nabarro JD (1974) Subcutaneous glucagon as a test of the ability of the pituitary to secrete GH and ACTH. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 3(2):175–186
Waldhausl W, Haydl H, Nowotny P (1976) ACTH and cortisol responses to glucagon stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 43(3):675–678
Berg C, Meinel T, Lahner H, Yuece A, Mann K, Petersenn S (2010) Diagnostic utility of the glucagon stimulation test in comparison to the insulin tolerance test in patients following pituitary surgery. Eur J Endocrinol 162(3):477–482. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0824
Simsek Y, Karaca Z, Tanriverdi F, Unluhizarci K, Selcuklu A, Kelestimur F (2015) A comparison of low-dose ACTH, glucagon stimulation and insulin tolerance test in patients with pituitary disorders. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 82(1):45–52. doi:10.1111/cen.12528
Verhelst J, Abs R (2009) Cardiovascular risk factors in hypopituitary GH-deficient adults. Eur J Endocrinol 161(Suppl 1):S41–S49. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0291
Corneli G, Di Somma C, Baldelli R, Rovere S, Gasco V, Croce CG, Grottoli S, Maccario M, Colao A, Lombardi G, Ghigo E, Camanni F, Aimaretti G (2005) The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index. Eur J Endocrinol 153(2):257–264. doi:10.1530/eje.1.01967
Karaca Z, Lale A, Tanriverdi F, Kula M, Unluhizarci K, Kelestimur F (2011) The comparison of low and standard dose ACTH and glucagon stimulation tests in the evaluation of hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis in healthy adults. Pituitary 14(2):134–140. doi:10.1007/s11102-010-0270-3
Mukherjee JJ, de Castro JJ, Kaltsas G, Afshar F, Grossman AB, Wass JA, Besser GM (1997) A comparison of the insulin tolerance/glucagon test with the short ACTH stimulation test in the assessment of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis in the early post-operative period after hypophysectomy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47(1):51–60
Reimondo G, Bovio S, Allasino B, Terzolo M, Angeli A (2008) Secondary hypoadrenalism. Pituitary 11(2):147–154. doi:10.1007/s11102-008-0108-4
Tavares AB, Seixas-da-Silva IA, Silvestre DH, Paixao CM Jr, Vaisman M, Conceicao FL (2015) Potential risks of glucagon stimulation test in elderly people. Growth Horm IGF Res 25(1):53–56. doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2014.11.002
di Iorgi N, Napoli F, Allegri A, Secco A, Calandra E, Calcagno A, Frassinetti C, Ghezzi M, Ambrosini L, Parodi S, Gastaldi R, Loche S, Maghnie M (2010) The accuracy of the glucagon test compared to the insulin tolerance test in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in young children with growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(5):2132–2139. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2697
Secco A, di Iorgi N, Napoli F, Calandra E, Ghezzi M, Frassinetti C, Parodi S, Casini MR, Lorini R, Loche S, Maghnie M (2009) The glucagon test in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children with short stature younger than 6 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(11):4251–4257. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0779
Bidlingmaier M (2008) Problems with GH assays and strategies toward standardization. Eur J Endocrinol 159(Suppl 1):S41–S44. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0284
Junnila RK, Strasburger CJ, Bidlingmaier M (2015) Pitfalls of insulin-like growth factor-i and growth hormone assays. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 44(1):27–34. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2014.10.003
Pokrajac A, Wark G, Ellis AR, Wear J, Wieringa GE, Trainer PJ (2007) Variation in GH and IGF-I assays limits the applicability of international consensus criteria to local practice. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 67(1):65–70. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02836.x
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Manjula Gupta for her assistance with running hormonal assays at Cleveland Clinic. We thank Robert Weil, Stacy Leg, Kellie Spiller and Ann Minnock for their assistance with dynamic tests. We acknowledge the partial support by the Clinical Research Center and its staff at Cleveland Clinic through the Case Western Reserve University/Cleveland Clinic CTSA Grant Number UL1TR000439 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCATS or NIH.
Funding
This study was partially supported by a Grant from Novo Nordisk.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
JB has nothing to declare. AHH received research Grant from Novo Nordisk and had received consulting honoraria from Versartis. KJP-H has received consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk. KCJY and BMKB had received research Grants from Novo Nordisk, OPKO and Versartis and consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Versartis. MBG has received research Grants from OPKO, Novo Nordisk, Teva and Pfizer and consulting honoraria from Novo Nordisk.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamrahian, A.H., Yuen, K.C.J., Gordon, M.B. et al. Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study. Pituitary 19, 332–341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7