Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitivism about emotion and the alleged hyperopacity of emotional content

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to cognitivism about emotion, (all) emotions are reducible to some (combinations of) non-emotional states. In one version, they are reducible entirely to cognitive states, such as beliefs or judgments; in another, they are reducible to combinations of cognitive and conative states, such as desire or intention. Cognitivism is plausibly regarded as the orthodoxy in the philosophy of emotion since the 1980s. In a recent paper, however, Montague develops a powerful argument against cognitivism. Here I argue that the argument nonetheless fails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Such fulfilled wishes (wishes for what had in fact taken place) are much harder to notice introspectively than frustrated wishes (wishes about what had not taken place), but arguably they are there all the same.

  2. This distinction pertains to what we may call ‘transitive happiness,’ the kind of happiness reported by a transitive verb. There is also what we might call ‘intransitive happiness,’ reported by the corresponding intransitive verb. It is an open question what the relationship between the two might be. One view is that ‘S is happy’ just means ‘S is happy about S’s life/existence.’ This would analyze intransitive happiness in terms of transitive happiness. Another view, however, would reject any such analysis.

  3. For useful comments on a previous draft, I am grateful to an anonymous referee for Philosophical Studies. Work on this paper was supported by the French National Research Agency’s grants ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*.

References

  • Bennett, J. (1988). Events and their names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gordon, R. (1987). The structure of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. (1982). A theory of emotion. Philosophical Studies, 42, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M. (2009). The logic, intentionality, and phenomenology of emotion. Philosophical Studies, 145, 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (1976). The passions. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. (1967). ‘Facts and events.’ In his linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uriah Kriegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kriegel, U. Cognitivism about emotion and the alleged hyperopacity of emotional content. Philos Stud 173, 315–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0493-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0493-2

Keywords

Navigation