Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Compliance with surgical prophylaxis guidelines in liver and kidney transplantations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Patients undergoing solid organ transplantations are at a high risk of surgical site infections. Complying with surgical prophylaxis guidelines minimize post-operative infection rate. Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the compliance with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists surgical prophylaxis guidelines related to antibiotic selection, dosing, administration time, and duration of surgical prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplantations. However, the re-dosing time was only assessed for liver transplantation cases. Setting The study was conducted at the solid organ transplantation center at King Abdualziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective chart review including all patients who had a liver or kidney transplantation from January 2016 to December 2018. Main outcome measure The compliance rate with the surgical prophylaxis guideline related to selecting the recommended antibiotic, dosing, administration time, and antibiotic exposure duration. The re-dosing time was assessed in liver transplantations. Results The study included 54 liver recipients and 163 kidney recipients, with an average age of 56 and 43 years, respectively. The majority of the included patients (68% and 56%) were male in both groups. The compliance rates to the recommendations in liver and kidney operations were 82.6% and 77.09% in terms of the choice of antibiotic, 44.5% and 13.4% in terms of dosing, 31.5% and 43.5% in terms of timing, and 18.47% and 84.36% in terms of duration, respectively. None of liver recipients received a re-dosed antibiotic at the recommended time. Conclusion The study concluded that there was an optimal compliance rate to the choice of antibiotic recommendations in both liver and kidney transplantations. Similarly, a high compliance rate was observed for the duration of antibiotic exposure after kidney transplantations. However, the compliance rate in terms of dosing and administration time was low in both transplantations. Low compliance rates were also observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure and the re-dosing time recommendations in liver transplants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atif M, Azouaou A, Bouadda N, Bezzaoucha A, Si-Ahmed M, Bellouni R. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection in a general surgery department in Algeria. Rev Epidémiol Santé Publ. 2015;63(4):275–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalho RLRD, Campos CC, Franco LMDC, Rocha ADM, Ercole FF. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection in general surgeries. Rev Lat Am Enferm. 2017;25:e2848.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fan Y, Wei Z, Wang W, Tan L, Jiang H, Tian L, et al. The incidence and distribution of surgical site infection in Mainland China: a meta-analysis of 84 prospective observational studies. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliveira R, Mancero J, Faria D, Poveda V. A retrospective cohort study of risk factors for surgical site infection following liver transplantation. Prog Transpl. 2019;29(2):144–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bliven K, Snow K, Carlson A, Yeager S, Kenyon N, Smith L, et al. Evaluating a change in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. Cureus. 2018;10(10):e3433.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Capocasale E, De Vecchi E, Mazzoni M, Dalla Valle R, Pellegrino C, Ferretti S, et al. Surgical site and early urinary tract infections in 1000 kidney transplants with antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis. Transpl Proc. 2014;46(10):3455–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hand J, Patel G. Antimicrobial stewardship in transplant patients. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2019;24(4):497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. p. 1–184.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subramaniam K, Sakai T, editors. Anesthesia and perioperative care for organ transplantation. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2017. ISBN 978-1-4939-6375-1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiva A, Ahmadi A, Habibi O, Rafati M. Adherence to American society of health-system pharmacists surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in a teaching hospital. J Res Pharm Pract. 2014;3(2):62–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Klinger G, Feigin E, Freud E, Steinberg R, Levy I, Carmeli I. Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in pediatric surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014;25(02):199–202.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Kabbani A, Tolba Y, Al-Kayyali N. An observational study of perioperative antibiotic-prophylaxis use at a major quaternary care and referral hospital in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(1):82–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohamed Rizvi Z, Palasanthiran P, Wu C, Mostaghim M, McMullan B. Adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in children: a cohort study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;56(1):34–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Broom J, Broom A, Kirby E, Post JJ. Improvisation versus guideline concordance in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a qualitative study. Infection. 2018;46(4):541–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosoglu S, Aslan S, Akalin S, Bosnak V. Audit of quality of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Pharm World Sci. 2008;31(1):14–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Riggi G, Castillo M, Fernandez M, Wawrzyniak A, Vigoda M, Eber S, et al. Improving compliance with timely intraoperative redosing of antimicrobials in surgical prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(10):1236–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou Y, Ma L, Zhao X, Tian S, Sun L, Cui Y. Impact of pharmacist intervention on antibiotic use and prophylactic antibiotic use in urology clean operations. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015;40(4):404–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang H, Li X, Huo H, Liang P, Zhang J, Ge W. Pharmacist interventions for prophylactic antibiotic use in urological in patients undergoing clean or clean-contaminated operations in a Chinese hospital. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88971.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamandi B, Husain S, Humar A, Papadimitropoulos EA. Impact of infectious disease consultation on the clinical and economic outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients admitted for infectious complications. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(8):1074–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Telfah S, Nazer L, Dirani M, Daoud F. Improvement in adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines after implementation of a multidisciplinary quality improvement project. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015;15(4):e523–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center is acknowledged for providing access to the data.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed S. Shawaqfeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest to be disclosed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 ASHP recommendations on surgical prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplantations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albassam, B.A., Albekairy, A.M. & Shawaqfeh, M.S. Compliance with surgical prophylaxis guidelines in liver and kidney transplantations. Int J Clin Pharm 42, 1425–1432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01107-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01107-z

Keywords

Navigation