Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Observations on the Tritiated Water and TEWL Skin Integrity Tests: Relevance to In Vitro Permeation Testing (IVPT)

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The in vitro permeation test (IVPT) using ex vivo human skin is a sensitive and robust model system that has been vital in elucidating the fundamental parameters surrounding the absorption of both therapeutic agents and industrial chemicals through skin. FDA and OECD IVPT Guidances recommend that each skin section selected for study should be screened prior to use to ensure that the stratum corneum integrity is retained. Three methods are currently considered acceptable: 1) transepidermal water loss (TEWL), 2) electrical resistance, and 3) tritiated water (3H2O) absorption.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of data from the authors’ laboratory has been performed with the objective of addressing a number of questions regarding the 3H2O and TEWL integrity tests, and the population attributes of a large database consisting of 17,330 individual skin sections obtained from 459 skin donors. The applicability and usefulness of these tests, when compared to companion permeation data obtained from 25 topical drug products, has also been examined.

Results

Both integrity tests found water permeability to be equal in White and Hispanic races but higher than in Blacks, 3H2O being more discriminating than TEWL. Male skin is more permeable than female and there is a slight decrease in permeability with advancing age in both groups. Correlation between 3H2O absorption and drug absorption revealed a minimal relationship between the two in most cases, the Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from -0.417 to 0.953. Additionally, drug outliers were not always identified with a failing integrity test.

Conclusion

The results call for a critical reexamination of the value of the 3H2O integrity test, and by extension, TEWL, for use in IVPT studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Limited upon request.

References

  1. Scheuplein RJ. Mechanism of percutaneous adsorption .I. Routes of penetration and the influence of solubility. J Invest Dermatol. 1965;45(5):334–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scheuplein RJ, Blank IH, Brauner GJ, MacFarlane DJ. Percutaneous absorption of steroids. J Invest Dermatol. 1969;52(1):63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostrenga J, Steinmetz C, Poulsen B. Significance of vehicle composition .I. Relationship between topical vehicle composition, skin penetrability, and clinical efficacy. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60(8):1175–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ostrenga J, Steinmetz C, Poulsen B, Yett S. Significance of vehicle composition. II. Prediction of optimal vehicle composition. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60(8):1180–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franz TJ, Parsell DA, Halualani RM, Hannigan JF, Kalbach JP, Harkonen WS. Betamethasone valerate foam 0.12%: a novel vehicle with enhanced delivery and efficacy. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(8):628–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Franz TJ, Lehman PA, Raney SG. The cadaver skin absorption model and the drug development process. Pharmacopeial Forum. 2008;34(5):1349–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. USFDA. Guidance for Industry. In vitro permeation for topical drug studies submitted in ANDAs, draft guidance. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Generic Drugs Rockville. https://www.fda.gov/media/162475/download.

  8. OECD. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 428. Skin Absorption: In Vitro Methods. Organisation for Economic Coooperation and Development, Paris; 2004.

  9. Skelly JP, Shah VP, Maibach HI, Guy RH, Wester RC, Flynn G, et al. FDA and AAPS report of the workshop on principles and practices of in vitro percutaneous penetration studies: Relevance to bioavailability and bioequivalence. Pharm Res. 1987;4(3):265–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howes D, Guy R, Hadgraft J, Heylings J, Hoeck U, Kemper F, et al. Methods for assessing percutaneous absorption, report and recommendation of ECVAM Workshop Report 13. Altern Lab Anim. 1996;24:81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SCCS. Basic criteria for the in vitro assessment of dermal absorption of cosmetic ingredients. European Commission, Directorate-General, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety 2010.

  12. Chilcott RP, Dalton CH, Emmanuel AJ, Allen CE, Bradley ST. Transepidermal water loss does not correlate with skin barrier function in vitro. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118(5):871–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rougier A, Lotte C, Maibach HI. In vivo relationship between percutaneous absorption and transepidermal water loss. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI, editors. Percutaneous Absorption: Drugs, Cosmetics, Mechanisms, Methodology. 4th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seo S. A review and comparison of methods for detecting outliers in univariate data sets. Master of Science Thesis, University of Pittsburgh; 2002. Available from: d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7948/1/Seo.pdf.

  15. Southwell D, Barry BW, Woodford R. Variation in permeability of human skin within and between specimens. Int J Pharm. 1984;18:299–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornwell PA, Barry BW. Effect of penetration enhancer treatment of the statistical distribution of human skin permeabilities. Int J Pharm. 1995;117:101–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meidan VM, Roper CS. Inter- and intra-individual variability in human skin barrier function: a large scale retrospective study. Toxicol In Vitro. 2008;22(4):1062–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehman PA, Beatch K, Raney SG, Franz TJ. The Tritiated Water Skin Barrier Integrity Test: Considerations for Acceptance Criteria with and Without (14)C-Octanol. Pharm Res. 2017;34(1):217–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bronaugh RL, Stewart RF, Simon M. Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. VII: Use of excised human skin. J Pharm Sci. 1986;75(11):1094–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blank IH. Further observations on factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol. 1953;21(4):259–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Menton DN, Eisen AZ. Structure and organization of mammalian stratum corneum. J Ultrastruct Res. 1971;35(3):247–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaller M, Plewig G. Structure and Function of Eccrine, Apocrine, Apoeccrine and Sebaceous Glands. In: Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Rapini R, editors. Dermatology. 1. New York: Mosby; 2003. p. 325–44.

  23. Montagna W, Parakkal P. The Strucutre and Function of Skin. New York: Aacademic Press, Inc; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lampe MA, Burlingame AL, Whitney J, Williams ML, Brown BE, Roitman E, et al. Human stratum corneum lipids: characterization and regional variations. J Lipid Res. 1983;24(2):120–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elias PM, Cooper ER, Korc A, Brown BE. Percutaneous transport in relation to stratum corneum structure and lipid composition. J Invest Dermatol. 1981;76(4):297–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lehman PA. IVPT data challenges in the real world: IVPT outlier, anomalous or aberrant data: examples. Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) in partnership with the FDA https://crcg.idfive.com/education-training/in-vitro-release-test-ivrt-and-in-vitro-permeation-test-ivpt-methods-best-practices-and-scientific-considerations-for-anda-submissions/.

  27. Guth K, Schafer-Korting M, Fabian E, Landsiedel R, van Ravenzwaay B. Suitability of skin integrity tests for dermal absorption studies in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro. 2015;29(1):113–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Netzlaff F, Kostka KH, Lehr CM, Schaefer UF. TEWL measurements as a routine method for evaluating the integrity of epidermis sheets in static Franz type diffusion cells in vitro. Limitations shown by transport data testing. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;63(1):44–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heylings JR, Clowes HM, Hughes L. Comparison of tissue sources for the skin integrity function test (SIFT). Toxicol In Vitro. 2001;15(4–5):597–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacques SL, McAuliffe DJ, Blank IH, Parrish JA. Controlled removal of human stratum corneum by pulsed laser. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88(1):88–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Q, Murawsky M, LaCount T, Kasting GB, Li SK. Transepidermal water loss and skin conductance as barrier integrity tests. Toxicol In Vitro. 2018;51:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Dandekar AA, Kale M, Garimella HT, Banga AK. Effect of compromised skin barrier on delivery of diclofenac sodium from brand and generic formulations via microneedles and iontophoresis. Int J Pharm. 2022;628: 122271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmook FP, Meingassner JG, Billich A. Comparison of human skin or epidermis models with human and animal skin in in-vitro percutaneous absorption. Int J Pharm. 2001;215(1–2):51–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brain KR, James VJ, Walters KA. Validation of the integrity of epidermal membranes during assessment of percutaneous penetration. In: Brain KR, James VJ, Walters KA, editors. Perspectives in Percutaneous Penetration. 4a. Cardiff: STS Publishing; 1995. p. 109.

  35. Frankild S, Andersen KE, Nielsen GD. Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) on in vitro percutaneous penetration of water, hydrocortisone and nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;32(6):338–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lehman PA, Franz TJ. Effect of age and diet on stratum corneum barrier function in the Fischer 344 female rat. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100(2):200–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lehman PA, Franz TJ. Effect of induced acute diabetes and insulin therapy on stratum corneum barrier function in rat skin. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;27(5):249–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two noninvasive methods. Skin Pharmacol. 1993;6(3):200–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilhelm KP, Cua AB, Maibach HI. Skin aging. Effect on transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and casual sebum content. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(12):1806–9.

  40. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(10):1134–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Influence of skin type, race, sex, and anatomic location on epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(3):269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No independent funding, grants or contracts were used in this retrospective data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington, USA

    Paul A. Lehman

  2. Oregon, USA

    Thomas J. Franz

Authors
  1. Paul A. Lehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas J. Franz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally in data collation, analysis, text preparation and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Lehman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial relationships to the work described.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lehman, P.A., Franz, T.J. Observations on the Tritiated Water and TEWL Skin Integrity Tests: Relevance to In Vitro Permeation Testing (IVPT). Pharm Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03707-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03707-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation