Abstract
Wastewater treatment process design involves the optimization of multiple conflicting objectives. The detection of different equivalent solutions in terms of objective values is crucial for designers in order to efficiently switch to the new optimal operation policies if changes in the process conditions or new constraints occur. In this work, the dynamic multi-objective optimization of a municipal wastewater treatment plant model is carried out. The aim is to simultaneously optimize an economic cost term and an effluent quality index. The selected process variables for the optimization are (1) an aeration factor in the aerated tank previous to the clarifier, and (2) an internal recycle flow rate. Their time profiles are approximated using the control vector parameterization technique. To solve the multi-objective problem and find the Pareto front, the NSGA-II algorithm has been used. The simulation of different realistic scenarios which impose operational constraints (e.g., maintenance operations) reveals that, indeed, multiple solutions exist at least in some areas of the Pareto front. It is observed that different control profiles can produce nearly identical results in terms of Pareto solutions. The a priori knowledge of these equivalent solutions for different scenarios provides the decision makers with alternative choices to be adapted to their organizations policies when events altering decision variables bounds or adding new constraints to the process model occur.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alex J, Benedetti L, Copp J, Gernaey K, Jeppsson U, Nopens I, Pons M, Rieger L, Rosen C, Steyer J, Vanrolleghem P, Winkler S (2008) Benchmark simulation model no. 1 (BSM1). Techical report
Åmand L, Carlsson B (2012) Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process. Water Res 46(7):2101–2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.023
Balku S, Berber R (2006) Dynamics of an activated sludge process with nitrification and denitrification: start-up simulation and optimization using evolutionary algorithm. Comput Chem Eng 30(3):490–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.10.014
Balku S, Yuceer M, Berber R (2009) Control vector parameterization approach in optimization of alternating aerobic-anoxic systems. Optim Control Appl Metods 30(6):573–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.883
Banga JR, Balsa-Canto E, Moles CG, Alonso AA (2005) Dynamic optimization of bioprocesses: efficient and robust numerical strategies. J Biotechnol 117(4):407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.02.013
Beraud B, Lemoine C, Steyer JP (2009) Multiobjective genetic algorithms for the optimisation of wastewater treatment processes. Stud Comput Intell 218:163–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01888-6_6
Chachuat B, Roche N, Latifi M (2005) Optimal aeration control of industrial alternating activated sludge plants. Biochem Eng J 23(3):277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2005.01.012
Chachuat B, Roche N, Latifi MA (2001) Dynamic optimisation of small size wastewater treatment plants including nitrification and denitrification processes. Comput Chem Eng 25(4–6):585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00638-X
Chen W, Lu X, Yao C (2015) Optimal strategies evaluated by multi-objective optimization method for improving the performance of a novel cycle operating activated sludge process. Chem Eng J 260:492–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.087
Copp J (2002) The COST simulation benchmark–description and simulator manual. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg
Costa L, Santo IAE, Fernandes EMGP (2011) Using a genetic algorithm to solve a bi-objective WWTP process optimization. In: Hu B, Morasch K, Pickl S, Siegle M (eds) Operations research proceedings 2010. Springer, pp 359–364
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
Denysiuk R, Santo I, Costa L (2018) Wastewater treatment plant design: optimizing multiple objectives. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on operations research and enterprise systems - ICORES 2018, pp 327–334
Egea JA, Gracia I (2012) Dynamic multiobjective global optimization of a waste water treatment plant for nitrogen removal. In: 7th Vienna international conference on mathematical modelling IFAC proceedings volumes 45(2):374–379. https://doi.org/10.3182/201202153AT3016.00066
Egea JA, Vries D, Alonso AA, Banga JR (2007) Global optimization for integrated design and control of computationally expensive process models. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:9148–9157. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0705094
Espírito Santo I, Costa L, Fernandes E (2013) On optimizing a WWTP design using multi-objective approaches. Eng Lett 21(4):193–202
Fettaka S, Thibault J, Gupta Y (2015) A new algorithm using front prediction and nsga-ii for solving two and three-objective optimization problems. Optim Eng 16(4):713–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9271-9
Flores-Alsina X, Gallego A, Feijoo G, Rodriguez-Roda I (2010) Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives. J Environ Manag 91(5):1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.009
Fu G, Butler D, Khu ST (2008) Multiple objective optimal control of integrated urban wastewater systems. Environ Model Softw 23(2):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.06.003
Fu G, Khu ST, Butler D (2009) Use of surrogate modelling for multiobjective optimisation of urban wastewater systems. Water Sci Technol 60(6):1641–1647. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.508
Guerrero J, Guisasola A, Comas J, Rodríguez-Roda I, Baeza J (2012) Multi-criteria selection of optimum WWTP control setpoints based on microbiology-related failures, effluent quality and operating costs. Chem Eng J 188:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.115
Hakanen J, Sahlstedt K, Miettinen K (2013) Wastewater treatment plant design and operation under multiple conflicting objective functions. Environ Model Softw 46:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.016
Han H, Liu Z, Lu W, Hou Y, Qiao J (2020) Dynamic MOPSO-based optimal control for wastewater treatment process. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2019.2925534
Hartikainen ME, Ojalehto V, Sahlstedt K (2015) Applying the approximation method PAINT and the interactive method NIMBUS to the multiobjective optimization of operating a wastewater treatment plant. Eng Optim 47(3):328–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.892593
Henze M, Grady Jr CL, Gujer W, Marais G, Matsuo T (1987) Activated sludge model no 1. IAWQ scientific and technical report 1, IAWQ, London (Great Britain)
Hreiz R, Latifi M, Roche N (2015) Optimal design and operation of activated sludge processes: state-of-the-art. Chem Eng J 281:900–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.125
Hreiz R, Roche N, Benyahia B, Latifi M (2015) Multi-objective optimal control of small-size wastewater treatment plants. Chem Eng Res Des 102:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.039
Jeppsson U, Pons MN (2004) The cost benchmark simulation model-current state and future perspective. Control Eng Pract 12(3):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.07.001
Jeppsson U, Alex J, Batstone DJ, Benedetti L, Comas J, Copp JB, Corominas L, Flores-Alsina X, Gernaey KV, Nopens I, Pons MN, Rodríguez-Roda I, Rosen C, Steyer JP, Vanrolleghem PA, Volcke EIP, Vrecko D (2013) Benchmark simulation models, quo vadis? Water Sci Technol 68(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.246
Knowles J (2006) ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(1):50–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2005.851274
Lewis PK, Tackett MWP, Mattson CA (2014) Considering dynamic pareto frontiers in decision making. Optim Eng 15(4):837–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-013-9238-2
Lukasse LJS, Keesman KJ (1999) Optimised operation and design of alternating activated sludge processes for N-removal. Water Res 33(11):2651–2659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00503-X
Luo J, Biegler LT (2011) Dynamic optimization of aeration operations for a benchmark wastewater treatment plant. 18th IFAC World Congress IFAC Proc Vol 44(1):14189–14194. https://doi.org/10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.01664
Martin C, Vanrolleghem PA (2014) Analysing, completing, and generating influent data for WWTP modelling: a critical review. Environ Modell Softw 60:188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.008
McCarty PL, Bae J, Kim J (2011) Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer—can this be achieved? Environ Sci Technol 45(17):7100–7106. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2014264
Moles CG, Gutierrez G, Alonso AA, Banga JR (2003) Integrated process design and control via global optimization: a wastewater treatment plant case study. Chem Eng Res Des 81:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387603765444465
Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2010) Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis. Sci Total Environ 408(20):4396–4402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.014
Molinos-Senante M, Hernandez-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2014) Benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: a tool to save operational costs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(1):149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0612-8
Ozturk MC, Serrat FM, Teymour F (2016) Optimization of aeration profiles in the activated sludge process. Chem Eng Sci 139:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.09.007
Qiao J, Zhang W (2018) Dynamic multi-objective optimization control for wastewater treatment process. Neural Comput Appl 29(11):1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2642-8
Rivas A, Irizar I, Ayesa E (2008) Model-based optimisation of wastewater treatment plants design. Environ Modell Softw 23(4):435–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.06.009
Samuelsson P, Halvarsson B, Carlsson B (2007) Cost-efficient operation of a denitrifying activated sludge process. Water Res 41(11):2325–2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.031
Schütze M, Butler D, Beck MB (1999) Optimisation of control strategies for the urban wastewater system—an integrated approach. Water Sci Technol 39(9):209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00235-8
Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2(3):221–248. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221
Srinivasan B, Palanki S, Bonvin D (2003) Dynamic optimization of batch processes: I. characterization of the nominal solution. Comput Chem Eng 27(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00116-3
Takács I, Patry GG, Nolasco D (1991) A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process. Water Res 25(10):1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90066-Y
Vallerio M, Hufkens J, Impe JV, Logist F (2015) An interactive decision-support system for multi-objective optimization of nonlinear dynamic processes with uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 42(21):7710–7731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.038
Vanrolleghem PA, Gillot S (2002) Robustness and economic measures as control benchmark performance criteria. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):117–126. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0565
Vanrolleghem P, Jeppsson U, Carstensen J, Carlsson B, Olsson G (1996) Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation—a systematic approach using cost functions. Water Sci Technol 34(3–4):159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(96)00568-9
Vassiliadis VS, Sargent RWH, Pantelides CC (1994a) Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 1. Problems without path constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(9):2111–2122. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00033a014
Vassiliadis VS, Sargent RWH, Pantelides CC (1994b) Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 2. Problems with path constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(9):2123–2133. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00033a015
Yong M, Yongzhen P, Jeppsson U (2006) Dynamic evaluation of integrated control strategies for enhanced nitrogen removal in activated sludge processes. Control Eng Pract 14(11):1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2005.06.018
Zhang R, Xie WM, Yu HQ, Li WW (2014) Optimizing municipal wastewater treatment plants using an improved multi-objective optimization method. Bioresour Technol 157:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.103
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICINN) and FEDER for their financial support (Projects DPI2016-77538-R and RTI2018-099139-B-C21).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ortiz-Martínez, V.M., Martínez-Frutos, J., Hontoria, E. et al. Multiplicity of solutions in model-based multiobjective optimization of wastewater treatment plants. Optim Eng 22, 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09500-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09500-3