Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 218))

Abstract

The combination of multiobjective genetic algorithms with wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) models provides an efficient framework for the evaluation, optimisation and comparison of WWTP control laws. This chapter presents a methodology developed for this efficient combination. Existing models and simulation software are used. They are combined with NSGA-II, a multiobjective genetic algorithm capable of finding the best tradeoffs (Pareto front) among multiple opposed objectives. Long term evaluations of the optimized solutions are proposed to check their robustness. An application of the methodology on the Benchmark Simulation Model 1 is presented and illustrates the benefits of the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thaure, D., Lemoine, C., Daniel, O., Moatamri, N., Chabrol, J.: Optimisation of Aeration for Activated Sludge Treatment with Simultaneous Nitrification Denitrification. Water Science and Technology 58(3), 639–645 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsson, G., Nielsen, M., Yuan, Z., Lynggaard-Jensen, A., Steyer, J.P.: Instrumentation, Control and Automation in Wastewater Systems. IWA Publishing, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henze, M., Grady Jr., C.P.L., Gujer, W., Marais, G.v.R., Matsuo, T.: Activated Sludge Model No. 1. IAWPRC Scientific and Technical Report No. 1, IAWQ, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wentzel, M.C., Marais, G.v.R.: Activated Sludge Model No. 2. IAWPRC Scientific and Technical Report No. 3, IAWQ, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wentzel, M.C., Marais, G.v.R., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.: Activated Sludge Model No. 2d. Water Science and Technology 39(1), 165–182 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gujer, W., Henze, M., Mino, T., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.: Activated Sludge Model No. 3. Water Science and Technology 39(1), 183–193 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazen, A.: On Sedimentation. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 53, 45–71 (1904)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krebs, P., Armbruster, M., Rodi, W.: Numerische Nachklärbecken-Modelle. KA-Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser, Abfall 47(7), 985–999 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kynch, G.J.: A theory of Sedimentation. Transactions of the Faraday Society 48, 166–176 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grijspeerdt, K., Vanrolleghem, P., Verstraete, W.: Selection of One-Dimensional Sedimentation: Models for On-Line Use. Water Science and Technology 31(2), 193–204 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takács, I., Patry, G.G., Nolasco, D.: A Dynamic Model of the Clarification-Thickening process. Water Research 25(10), 1263–1271 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gernaey, K.V., Jeppsson, U., Batstone, D.J., Ingildsen, P.: Impact of Reactive Settler Models on Simulated WWTP Performance. Water Science and Technology 53(1), 159–167 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ekama, G.A., Barnard, J.L., Günthert, F.W., Krebs, P., McCorquodale, J.A., Parker, D.S., Wahlberg, E.J.: Secondary Settling Tanks: Theory, Modelling and Operation. IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report No. 6, IAWQ, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Clerq, B.: Computational Fluid Dynamics of Settling Tanks: Development of Experiments and Rheological, Settling and Scraper Submodels. PhD thesis, Ghent University, 338 p. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss, M., Plosz, B., Essemiani, K., Meinhold, J.: Sedimentation of Activated Sludge in Secondary Clarifiers. In: Fifth World Congress on Particle Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Copp, J.: The COST Simulation Benchmark - Description and Simulator Manual. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IWA Task Group on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for WWTPs, http://www.benchmarkwwtp.org

  18. Jeppsson, U., Pons, M.N.: The COST 624 Benchmark Simulation Model - Current State and Future Perspective. Control Engineering Practice 12(3), 299–304 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nopens, I., Benedetti, L., Jeppsson, U., Pons, M.N., Alex, J., Copp, J.B., Gernaey, K.V., Rosen, C., Steyer, J.P., Vanrolleghem, P.A.: Benchmark Simulation Model No 2 - Finalisation of Plant Layout and Default Control Strategy. In: IWA World Water Congress 2008, Vienna (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen, C., Jeppsson, U., Vanrolleghem, P.A.: Towards a Common Benchmark for Long-Term Process Control and Monitoring Performance Evaluation. Water Science and Technology 50(11), 41–49 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gernaey, K.V., Rosen, C., Jeppsson, U.: WWTP Dynamic Disturbance Modelling - an Essential Module for Long-Term Benchmarking Development. Water Science and Technology 53(4-5), 225–234 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeppsson, U., Rosen, C., Alex, J., Copp, J., Gernaey, K.V., Pons, M.N., Vanrolleghem, P.A.: Towards a Benchmark Simulation Model for Plant-Wide Control Strategy Performance Evaluation of WWTPs. Water Science and Technology 53(1), 287–295 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen, C., Vrecko, D., Gernaey, K.V., Pons, M.N., Jeppsson, U.: Implementing ADM1 for Plant-Wide Benchmark Simulations in Matlab/Simulink. Water Science and Technology 54(4), 11–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakizlis, V., Perkins, J.D., Pistikopoulos, E.N.: Recent Advances in Optimisation-Based Simultaneous Process and Control Design. Computers and Chemical Engineering 28(10), 2069–2086 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steyer, J.P., Harmand, J.: Economical Design of Biological Systems: New Tools for Advanced Integrated Process and Control Design. Laboratory report PUB0200030140092553 INRA Narbonne, France (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vera, J., Torres, N.V., Moles, C.G., Banga, J.: Integrated Nonlinear Optimisation of Bioprocesses via Linear Programming. AIChE Journal 49(12), 3173–3187 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Balku, S., Berber, R.: Dynamics of an Activated Sludge Process with Nitrification and Denitrification: Start-up Simulation and Optimisation using Evolutionary Algorithm. Computer and Chemical Engineering 30(3), 490–499 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fikar, M., Chachuat, B., Latifi, M.A.: Optimal Operation of Alternating Activated Sludge Processes. Control Engineering Practice 7(13), 853–861 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holenda, B., Domokos, E., Rédey, A., Fazakas, J.: Aeration Optimisation of a Wastewater Treatment Plant using Genetic Algorithm. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 28(3), 191–208 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rivas, A., Irizar, I., Ayesa, E.: Model-based Optimisation of Wastewater Treatment Plants Design. Environmental Modelling and Software 23(4), 435–450 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chachuat, B., Roche, N., Latifi, M.A.: Long-Term Optimal Aeration Strategies for Small-Size Alternating Activated Sludge Treatment Plants. Chemical Engineering and Processing 44(5), 591–604 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Savic, D.: Single-Objective vs. Multiobjective Optimisation for Integrated Decision Support Integrated Assessment and Decision Support. In: First Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A comparative Study. Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Platte, F., Kuzmin, D., Fredebeul, C.H., Turek, S.: Novel Simulation Approaches for Cyclic Steady-State Fixed-Bed Processes Exhibiting Sharp Fronts and Shocks. International Series of Numerical Mathematics 151, 207–223 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Reeves, C.R.: Genetic Algorithms. In: Glover, F., Kochenberger, G.A. (eds.) Handbook of Metaheuristics. International Series on Operations Research and Management Science, pp. 65–82. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  37. De Jong, K.A.: An Analysis of the Behavior of a Class of Genetic Adaptive Systems. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 266 p. (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Reeves, C.R.: Using Genetic Algorithms with Small Population. In: Forest, S. (ed.) Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 92–99. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eshelman, L.J., Caruana, R.A., Schaffer, J.D.: Biases in the Crossover Landscape. In: Schaffer, J.D. (ed.) Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 10–19. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mathias, K.E., Whitley, D.: Transforming the Search Space with Gray Coding. In: IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 513–518 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Whitley, D.: A Free Lunch Proof for Gray versus Binary Encodings. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 1999), pp. 726–733 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimisation Using Evolutionary Algorithms, 518 p. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Herrera, F., Lozano, M., Verdegay, J.L.: Tackling Real-Coded Genetic Algorithms: Operators and Tools for Behavioural Analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review 12, 265–319 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimisation. In: Giannakoglou, K.C., Tsahalis, D.T., Periaux, J., Papailiou, K.D., Fogarty, T. (eds.) Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control with Application to Industrial Problems (EUROGEN 2001), pp. 95–100. International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Corne, D.W., Jerram, N.R., Knowles, J.D., Oates, M.J.: PESA-II: Region-Based Selection in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimisation. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2001), pp. 283–290 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimisation: NSGA-II. In: 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 849–858. Springer, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: Approximating the Non-Dominated Front using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy. Evolutionary Computation 8(2), 149–172 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N., Goldberg, D.E.: A Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimisation. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 82–87. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Bekele, E.G., Nicklow, J.W.: Multi-objective Automatic Calibration of SWAT using NSGA-II. Journal of Hydrology 341(3-4), 165–176 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Majumdar, S., Mitra, K., Raha, S.: Optimized Species Growth in Epoxy Polymerization with Real-Coded NSGA-II. Polymer 46(25), 11858–11869 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reed, P., Minsker, B.: Striking the Balance: Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Design for Conflicting Objectives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130(2), 140–149 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Srinivas, N., Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Function Optimisation Using Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 2(3), 221–248 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Deb, K., Jain, S.: Running Performance Metrics for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimisation. Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory Report 2002004 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beraud, B., Lemoine, C., Steyer, JP. (2009). Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for the Optimisation of Wastewater Treatment Processes. In: do Carmo Nicoletti, M., Jain, L.C. (eds) Computational Intelligence Techniques for Bioprocess Modelling, Supervision and Control. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01888-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01888-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01887-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01888-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics