Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuro-oncological patients admitted in intensive-care unit: predictive factors and functional outcome

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prognosis of oncology patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) is considered poor. Our objective was to analyze the characteristics and predictive factors of death in the ICU and functional outcome following ICU treatment for neuro-oncology patients. A retrospective study was conducted on all patients with primary brain tumor admitted to our institutional ICU for medical indications. Predictive impact on the risk of death in the ICU was analyzed as well as the functional status was evaluated prior and following ICU discharge. Seventy-one patients were admitted to the ICU. ICU admission indications were refractory seizures (41 %) and septic shock (17 %). On admission, 16 % had multi-organ failure. Ventilation was necessary for 41 % and catecholamines for 13 %. Twenty-two percent of patients died in the ICU. By multivariate analysis, predictive factors associated with an increased risk of ICU death were: non-neurological cause of admission [p = 0.045; odds ratio (OR) 5.405], multiple organ failure (p = 0.021; OR 8.027), respiratory failure (p = 0.006; OR 9.615), and hemodynamic failure (p = 0.008; OR 10.111). In contrast, tumor type (p = 0.678) and disease control status (p = 0.380) were not associated with an increased risk of ICU death. Among the 35 evaluable patients, 77 % presented with a stable or improved Karnofsky performance status following ICU hospitalization compared with the ongoing status before discharge. In patients with primary brain tumor admitted to the ICU, predictive factors of death appear to be similar to those described in non-oncology patients. ICU hospitalization is generally not associated with a subsequent decrease in the functional status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kostakou E, Rovina N, Kyriakopoulou M, Koulouris NG, Koutsoukou A (2014) Critically ill cancer patient in intensive care unit: issues that arise. J Crit Care 29:817–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulkarni AP, Divatia JV (2013) A prospective audit of costs of intensive care in cancer patients in India. Indian J Crit Care Med 17:292–297

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wigmore TJ, Farquhar-Smith P, Lawson A (2013) Intensive care for the cancer patient—unique clinical and ethical challenges and outcome prediction in the critically ill cancer patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 27:527–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aygencel G, Turkoglu M, Turkoz Sucak G, Benekli M (2014) Prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 29:618–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Montmollin E, Tandjaoui-Lambiotte Y, Legrand M et al (2013) Outcomes in critically ill cancer patients with septic shock of pulmonary origin. Shock Augusta Ga 39:250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamia B, Hellot M-F, Girault C, Tamion F, Dachraoui F, Lenain P, Bonmarchand G (2006) Changes in severity and organ failure scores as prognostic factors in onco-hematological malignancy patients admitted to the ICU. Intensive Care Med 32:1560–1568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Azoulay E, Moreau D, Alberti C, Leleu G, Adrie C, Barboteu M, Cottu P, Levy V, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2000) Predictors of short-term mortality in critically ill patients with solid malignancies. Intensive Care Med 26:1817–1823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent J-L, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA et al (2014) Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med 2:380–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiéry G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ciroldi M, De Miranda S, Lévy V, Fieux F, Moreau D, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2005) Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:4406–4413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrà C, Marcos P, Misis M et al (2007) Outcome and prognostic factors in patients with hematologic malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center experience. Int J Hematol 85:195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W et al (2014) Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370:709–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soussain C, Hoang-Xuan K, Taillandier L et al (2008) Intensive chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for refractory and recurrent primary CNS and intraocular lymphoma: Société Française de Greffe de Moëlle Osseuse-Thérapie Cellulaire. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26:2512–2518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41:580–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sampson JH, Heimberger AB, Archer GE et al (2010) Immunologic escape after prolonged progression-free survival with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III peptide vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:4722–4729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang Y, Huh J-W, Hong S-B, Lee DH, Suh C, Kim S-W, Lim C-M, Koh Y (2014) Outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with lung cancer and pneumonia-induced respiratory failure in a medical intensive care unit: a single-center study. J Crit Care 29:414–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soares M, Silva UVA, Teles JMM, Silva E, Caruso P, Lobo SMA, Dal Pizzol F, Azevedo LP, de Carvalho FB, Salluh JIF (2010) Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 36:1188–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soares M, Toffart A-C, Timsit J-F et al (2014) Intensive care in patients with lung cancer: a multinational study. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 25:1829–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YJ, Kim M-J, Cho Y-J et al (2014) Who should be admitted to the intensive care unit? The outcome of intensive care unit admission in stage IIIB-IV lung cancer patients. Med Oncol Northwood Lond Engl 31:847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Azoulay E, Mokart D, Pène F et al (2013) Outcomes of critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies: prospective multicenter data from France and Belgium—a groupe de recherche respiratoire en réanimation onco-hématologique study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 31:2810–2818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larché J, Azoulay E, Fieux F, Mesnard L, Moreau D, Thiery G, Darmon M, Le Gall J-R, Schlemmer B (2003) Improved survival of critically ill cancer patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med 29:1688–1695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Azoulay E, Alberti C, Bornstain C, Leleu G, Moreau D, Recher C, Chevret S, Le Gall JR, Brochard L, Schlemmer B (2001) Improved survival in cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support: impact of noninvasive mechanical ventilatory support. Crit Care Med 29:519–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was completed in the SIRIC of Marseille, grant INCa-DGOS-Inserm 6038. ARTCsud.

Authors’ Contribution

ET conceived the study, participated in its design, acquired and analysed data and drafted the manuscript. RD conceived the study, participated in its design, analyzed data and helped to draft the manuscript. SB, MB, CB, and DA participated in the acquisition of data. SB help to draft the manuscript. OC and NB participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Tabouret.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 83 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabouret, E., Boucard, C., Devillier, R. et al. Neuro-oncological patients admitted in intensive-care unit: predictive factors and functional outcome. J Neurooncol 127, 111–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-2015-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-2015-7

Keywords

Navigation