Skip to main content
Log in

Clones of non-pathological witches’ broom and normal crown from the same trees in Pinus sibirica on common and separate rootstocks: how and why David wins over Goliath

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mutational witches’ broom (WB) is a local system of tree shoots with abnormally dense branching and slow growth that visually differs from the normal crown and is presumably caused by a dominant somatic mutation. In this study, we compared the growth of the mutant and normal clones from the same trees growing on different rootstocks and on different branches of the same rootstock to determine how a mutational WB affects a normal tree crown if they have the same starting position. We measured graft length, crown width, and stem diameter at the base of the graft in five pairs of 20-old mutant and normal clones originating from the same trees grafted on normal rootstock. The intrinsic capabilities of a witches’ broom are very limited. Single WB clones had 2.0–3.8-fold shorter stems, 1.5–2.0-fold lower crown width, and 1.2–2.0-fold lower stem diameter than single normal clones. When the mutant and normal clones grew together on a double-stem rootstock, mutant clones had approximately the same growth rate but easily suppressed normal crown clones. In this case, WB clones had 1.4–1.8-fold taller stem height, 3.0–4.0-fold higher crown width, and 2.5–4.0-fold higher stem diameter than normal crown clones due to the abnormally high attracting capacity of a WB. The more pronounced the specific traits in WB clones, such as reduced growth and increased branching, the more aggressive they behave relative to the normal crown to more quickly and strongly suppress growth. Characteristics of the WB, such as growth abnormality, aggressiveness relative to the normal crown, and reduced level of differentiation, make it more similar to a benign neoplasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja MR, Neale DB (2005) Evolution of genome size in conifers. Silvae Genet 54:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2005-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auders AG, Spicer DP (2012) Royal Horticultural Society encyclopedia of conifers: a comprehensive guide to cultivars and species. Royal Horticultural Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CL, Sommer HE, Wetzstein H (1994) Morphological and histological differences in the development of dwarf mutants of sexual and somatic origin in diverse woody taxa. Trees 9:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland DC, Kuijt J (1957) Unexplained brooming of Douglas-fir and other conifers in British Columbia and Alberta. For Sci 3:236–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline MG, Sadeski K (2002) Is auxin the repressor signal of branch growth in apical control? Am J Bot 89:1764–1771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cregg B (2007) Conifer genetic and selection. Conifer Quart 24(1):6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield J, Wheat J (1963) Dwarf seedlings from broomed Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 12:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham AJ (1967) Dwarf conifers from Witches’-Brooms. Arnoldia 24:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster TM, Aranzana MJ (2018) Attention sports fans! The far-reaching contributions of bud sport mutants to horticulture and plant biology. Hortic Res 5:44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0062-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh DK, Das AK, Singh S, Singh SJ, Ahlawat YS (1999) Association of a phytoplasma with witches’ broom, a new disease of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia). Curr Sci 77:174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso V (1969) Dwarf seedlings from witches’ brooms of Pinus halepensis. Italia Forestale e Montana 24:241–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Han M, Sun Q, Zhou J, Qiu H, Guo J, Lu L, Mu W, Sun J (2017) Insertion of a solo LTR retrotransposon associates with spur mutations in “Red Delicious” apple (Malus × domestica). Plant Cell Rep 36:1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2160-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmati F, Afsharifar A. (2021) Association of a phytoplasma from ribosomal subgroup 16SrXII-A with walnut witches’-broom in Iran. New Dis Rep 44:e1. https://doi.org/10.1002/ndr2.12024

  • James S (1984) Lignotubers and burls: their structure, function and ecological significance in Mediterranean ecosystems. Bot Rev 50:225–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman RG (1993) Tissue proliferation. Am Nurseryman 178:56–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E (2007) Concepts of modelling carbon allocation among plant organs. In: Vos J, Marcelis LFM, de Visser PHB, Struik PC, Evers JB (eds) Functional structural plant modelling in crop production. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 103–111

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr S, Schwienbacher F, Beikircher B, Dämon B (2010) Damage in needle tissues after infection with Chrysomyxa rhododendri increases cuticular conductance of Picea abies in winter. Protoplasma 243:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-009-0039-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen S, Lindgren M, Pouttu A, Heinonen J, Hongisto M, Neuvonen S (2009) Extensive tree health monitoring networks are useful in revealing the impacts of widespread biotic damage in boreal forests. Environ Monit Assess 168:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1100-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oner N, Dogan HH, Ozturk C, Gurer M (2009) Determination of fungal diseases, site and stand characteristics in mixed stands in Ilgaz-Yenice forest district, Cankiri, Turkey. J Environ Biol 30:567–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto D, Petersen R, Brauksiepe B, Braun P, Schmidt ER (2014) The columnar mutation (“Co gene”) of apple (Malus x domestica) is associated with an integration of a Gypsy-like retrotransposon. Mol Breeding 33:863–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-0001-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen R, Krost C (2013) Tracing a key player in the regulation of plant architecture: the columnar growth habit of apple trees (Malus x domestica). Planta 238:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1898-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polyakova O, Goroshkevich S, Zhuk E (2019) Cone structure and seed development in grafted witches’ broom and normal crown clones from the same trees of Pinus sibirica. New Forests 50:805–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-09700-x

  • Shimizu-Sato S, Mori H (2001) Control of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Plant Physiol 127:1405–1413. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MR, Rao IM, Merchant A (2018) Source-sink relationships in crop plants and their influence on yield development and nutritional quality. Front Plant Sci 9:1889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vrgoc P (2002) Witches’ broom of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) and its use for new ornamentals. Proceedings of XX International Eucarpia Symposium, Section Ornamentals, Strategies for New Ornamentals II. Acta Hort 572:199–205.

  • Waxman S (1987) Dwarf conifers from witches’ volatile components and fatty acids in a CO extract brooms. Comb Proc Int Plant Propag Soc 36:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch HJ (1991) The Uses and Value of Conifers. In: The Conifer Manual. Forestry Sciences, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 18–25.

  • Yamaki S (2010) Metabolism and accumulation of sugars translocated to fruit and their regulation. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 79:1–15. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.79.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamburov MS, Goroshkevich SN (2007) Witches’-brooms in Siberian stone pine as somatic mutations: occurrence, features and possibility of using in breeding programs. Khvoynyye Borealnoy Zony 24:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamburov MS, Goroshkevich SN (2008) Witches’ brooms in Siberian stone pine as somatic mutations and initial genetic material for breeding of nut-bearing and ornamental cultivars. Ann For Res 51:165–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Li P, Chen Y, Han W, Fang J (2016) Nutrient allocation strategies of woody plants: an approach from the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus between twig stems and leaves. Sci Rep 6:20099. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Midmore DJ (2009) Self-organisation at the whole-plant level: a modelling study. Funct Plant Biol 36:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP08046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yun HY, Hong SG, Rossman AY, Lee SK, Lee KJ, Bae KS (2009) The rust fungus Gymnosporangium in Korea including two new species G. monticola and G. unicorne. Mycologia 101:790–809. https://doi.org/10.3852/08-221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuk E, Vasilyeva G, Goroshkevich S (2015) Witches’ broom and normal crown clones from the same trees of Pinus sibirica: a comparative morphological study. Trees 29:1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1187-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuk E, Vasilyeva G, Goroshkevich S (2020) Mutational witches’ broom impact on the growth of the parent branch in several Pinaceae species. Dendrobiology 83:52–59. https://doi.org/10.12657/denbio.083.005

  • Zimmerman RH (1997) A review of tissue proliferation of Rhododendron. In: Cassells AC (eds) Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation. Developments in Plant Pathology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 355–362.

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SG conceived and designed the research, created the experimental objects, carried out field observations, interpreted the results. GV discussed the results and prepared the manuscript. EZ conducted data processing, wrote the manuscript with contributions from all the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Galina Vasilyeva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goroshkevich, S., Vasilyeva, G. & Zhuk, E. Clones of non-pathological witches’ broom and normal crown from the same trees in Pinus sibirica on common and separate rootstocks: how and why David wins over Goliath. New Forests 54, 217–232 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09919-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09919-9

Keywords

Navigation