Abstract
Musculoskeletal multibody modeling can offer valuable insight into aetiopathogenesis behind adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, which has remained unclear. However, the underlying model should represent anatomical joints with compatible kinematic constraints while allowing the model to attain scoliotic postures. This work presents an improved and kinematically determinate model including the whole spine and ribcage, which can attain typical scoliosis deformations of the thorax with compatible constraint strategy and simulate the interaction between all the bony segments of the ribcage and the spine. In the model, costovertebral/costotransverse joints were defined as universal joints based on reported anatomical studies. Articulations between ribs and the sternum were defined as spherical joints except in the ninth and tenth pairs, which have one additional anteroposterior degree-of-freedom. The model is controlled by 15 kinematic parameters, including spinal rhythms and parameters relating to clinical metrics of scoliosis. These input values were measured from the bi-planar radiographs of a 17-year-old scoliosis patient with a right main thoracic curve of 33° Cobb angle. Dependent kinematic variables with clinical relevance were selected for validation purposes and compared with measurements from radiographs. The average errors of rib-vertebra angles, rib-vertebra angle differences, and rib humps were 6.6° and 9.0°, and 6.3 mm. The model appeared to reproduce the spine and rib deformation pattern conforming to radiographs, results in simulating the rib prominence, rib spread, rib-vertebra angles, and sternum orientation, therefore supporting the constraint definitions. The model can subsequently be used to investigate the kinetics of scoliosis and contribute to uncovering the pathomechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
After an internal review, the model will be made publicly available through https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3932764.
Code Availability
The software to run the model is The AnyBody Modeling System, available from AnyBody Technology A/S, www.anybodytech.com.
References
Wong, C.: Mechanism of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at risk for progression; a unifying pathway of development by normal growth and imbalance. Scoliosis 10, 1–5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-015-0030-2
Machida, M., Weinstein, S.L., Dubousset, J.: Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Scoliosis. Springer, Tokyo (2018)
Cheng, J.C., Castelein, R.M., Chu, W.C., Danielsson, A.J., Dobbs, M.B., Grivas, T.B., Gurnett, C.A., Luk, K.D., Moreau, A., Newton, P.O., Stokes, I.A., Weinstein, S.L., Burwell, R.G.: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 1, 15030 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.30
Scoliosis Research Society (SRS): (2021). https://www.srs.org/. Accessed 24 February 2021
Jalalian, A., Gibson, I., Tay, E.H.: Computational biomechanical modeling of scoliotic spine: challenges and opportunities. Spine Deform. 1, 401–411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.07.009
Villemure, I., Aubin, C.E., Dansereau, J., Labelle, H.: Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses. Eur. Spine J. 13, 83–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0565-4
Driscoll, M., Mac-Thiong, J.M., Labelle, H., Parent, S.: Development of a detailed volumetric finite element model of the spine to simulate surgical correction of spinal deformities. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 931741 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/931741
Cahill, P.J., Wang, W., Asghar, J., Booker, R., Betz, R.R., Ramsey, C., Baran, G.: The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine 37, 687–695 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246d4f2 (Phila. Pa. 1976)
Monteiro, N.M.B., da Silva, M.P.T., Folgado, J.O.M.G., Melancia, J.P.L.: Structural analysis of the intervertebral discs adjacent to an interbody fusion using multibody dynamics and finite element cosimulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25, 245–270 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9226-7
Stokes, I.A.F., Laible, J.P.: Three-dimensional osseo-ligamentous model of the thorax representing initiation of scoliosis by asymmetric growth. J. Biomech. 23, 589–595 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90051-4
Duke, K., Aubin, C.-E., Dansereau, J., Labelle, H.: Biomechanical simulations of scoliotic spine correction due to prone position and anaesthesia prior to surgical instrumentation. Clin. Biomech. 20, 923–931 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2005.05.006
Sevrain, A., Aubin, C.E., Gharbi, H., Wang, X., Labelle, H.: Biomechanical evaluation of predictive parameters of progression in adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: a computer modeling and simulation study. Scoliosis 7, 1–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-2
Solomonow, M., Zhou, B.-H., Harris, M., Lu, Y., Baratta, R.V.: The ligamento-muscular stabilizing system of the spine. Spine 23, 2552–2562 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199812010-00010 (Phila. Pa. 1976)
du Rose, A., Breen, A.: Relationships between paraspinal muscle activity and lumbar inter-vertebral range of motion. Healthcare 4, 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4010004
Rohlmann, A., Bauer, L., Zander, T., Bergmann, G., Wilke, H.J.: Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. J. Biomech. 39, 981–989 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019
Wang, W., Baran, G.R., Betz, R.R., Samdani, A.F., Pahys, J.M., Cahill, P.J.: The use of finite element models to assist understanding and treatment for scoliosis: a review paper. Spine Deform. 2, 10–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.09.007
Ezquerro, F., Simón, A., Prado, M., Pérez, A.: Combination of finite element modeling and optimization for the study of lumbar spine biomechanics considering the 3D thorax-pelvis orientation. Med. Eng. Phys. 26, 11–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00128-0
Huynh, A.M., Aubin, C.E., Mathieu, P.A., Labelle, H.: Simulation of progressive spinal deformities in Duchenne muscular dystrophy using a biomechanical model integrating muscles and vertebral growth modulation. Clin. Biomech. 22, 392–399 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.010
Kamal, Z., Rouhi, G., Arjmand, N., Adeeb, S.: A stability-based model of a growing spine with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a combination of musculoskeletal and finite element approaches. Med. Eng. Phys. 64, 46–55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.015
Shirazi-Adl, A., El-Rich, M., Pop, D.G., Parnianpour, M.: Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads—application of kinematics-based algorithm. Eur. Spine J. 14, 381–392 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0779-0
Abouhossein, A., Weisse, B., Ferguson, S.J.: A multibody modelling approach to determine load sharing between passive elements of the lumbar spine. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 14, 527–537 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2010.485568
Stokes, I.A.F., Gardner-Morse, M.: Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. J. Biomech. 28, 173–186 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)E0040-A
Galbusera, F., Wilke, H.-J., Brayda-Bruno, M., Costa, F., Fornari, M.: Influence of sagittal balance on spinal lumbar loads: a numerical approach. Clin. Biomech. 28, 370–377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2013.02.006
Raabe, M.E., Chaudhari, A.M.W.: An investigation of jogging biomechanics using the full-body lumbar spine model: model development and validation. J. Biomech. 49, 1238–1243 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.046
Christophy, M., Adila, N., Senan, F., Lotz, J.C., Reilly, O.M.O.: A musculoskeletal model for the lumbar spine. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11, 19–34 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0290-6
Arshad, R., Zander, T., Dreischarf, M., Schmidt, H.: Influence of lumbar spine rhythms and intra-abdominal pressure on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination. Med. Eng. Phys. 38, 333–338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.01.013
Christophy, M., Curtin, M., Faruk Senan, N.A., Lotz, J.C., O’Reilly, O.M.: On the modeling of the intervertebral joint in multibody models for the spine. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 30, 413–432 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-012-9331-x
de Zee, M., Hansen, L., Wong, C., Rasmussen, J., Simonsen, E.B.: A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model. J. Biomech. 40, 1219–1227 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.030
Arjmand, N., Shirazi-Adl, A.: Model and in vivo studies on human trunk load partitioning and stability in isometric forward flexions. J. Biomech. 39, 510–521 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2004.11.030
Jalalian, A., Tay, F.E.H., Arastehfar, S., Liu, G.: A patient-specific multibody kinematic model for representation of the scoliotic spine movement in frontal plane of the human body. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 39, 197–220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-016-9556-1
Harrison, D.E., Colloca, C.J., Harrison, D.D., Janik, T.J., Haas, J.W., Keller, T.S.: Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading. Eur. Spine J. 14, 234–242 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0734-0
Keller, T.S., Colloca, C.J., Harrison, D.E., Harrison, D.D., Janik, T.J.: Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine. Spine J. 5, 297–309 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.050
Briggs, A.M., van Dieën, J.H., Wrigley, T.V., Greig, A.M., Phillips, B., Lo, S.K., Bennell, K.L.: Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force. Phys. Ther. 87, 595–607 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060119
Watkins, R., Watkins, R., Williams, L., Ahlbrand, S., Garcia, R., Karamanian, A., Sharp, L., Vo, C., Hedman, T.: Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine. Spine 30, 1283–1286 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000164257.69354.bb (Phila. Pa. 1976)
Brasiliense, L.B.C., Lazaro, B.C.R., Reyes, P.M., Dogan, S., Theodore, N., Crawford, N.R.: Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability. Spine 36, E1686–E1693 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219ce84 (Phila. Pa. 1976)
Sham, M.L., Zander, T., Rohlmann, A., Bergmann, G.: Effects of the rib cage on thoracic spine flexibility/Einfluss des Brustkorbs auf die Flexibilität der Brustwirbelsäule. Biomed. Tech. Eng. 50, 361–365 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1515/BMT.2005.051
Bruno, A.G., Bouxsein, M.L., Anderson, D.E.: Development and validation of a musculoskeletal model of the fully articulated thoracolumbar spine and rib cage. J. Biomech. Eng. 137, 081003 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030408
Ignasiak, D., Dendorfer, S., Ferguson, S.J.: Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading. J. Biomech. 49, 959–966 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.010
Bayoglu, R., Galibarov, P.E., Verdonschot, N., Koopman, B., Homminga, J.: Twente Spine Model: a thorough investigation of the spinal loads in a complete and coherent musculoskeletal model of the human spine. Med. Eng. Phys. 68, 35–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.03.015
Higuchi, R., Komatsu, A., Iida, J., Iwami, T., Shimada, Y.: Construction and validation under dynamic conditions of a novel thoracolumbar spine model with defined muscle paths using the wrapping method. J. Biomech. Sci. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1299/jbse.18-00432
Damsgaard, M., Rasmussen, J., Christensen, S.T., Surma, E., de Zee, M.: Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 14, 1100–1111 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2006.09.001
Nikravesh, P.E.: Planar Multibody Dynamics: Formulation, Programming and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)
de Zee, M., Falla, D., Farina, D., Rasmussen, J.: A detailed rigid-body cervical spine model based on inverse dynamics. J. Biomech. 40, S284 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(07)70280-4
Pearcy, M.J., Bogduk, N.: Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine 13, 1033–1041 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198809000-00011 (Phila. Pa. 1976)
Lemosse, D., Le Rue, O., Diop, A., Skalli, W., Marec, P., Lavaste, F.: Characterization of the mechanical behaviour parameters of the costo-vertebral joint. Eur. Spine J. 7, 16–23 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050021
Duprey, S., Subit, D., Guillemot, H., Kent, R.W.: Biomechanical properties of the costovertebral joint. Med. Eng. Phys. 32, 222–227 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.12.001
Beyer, B., Sholukha, V., Dugailly, P.M., Rooze, M., Moiseev, F., Feipel, V., Van Sint Jan, S.: In vivo thorax 3D modelling from costovertebral joint complex kinematics. Clin. Biomech. 29, 434–438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.01.007
Grellmann, W., Berghaus, A., Haberland, E.-J., Jamali, Y., Holweg, K., Reincke, K., Bierögel, C.: Determination of strength and deformation behavior of human cartilage for the definition of significant parameters. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 78A, 168–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30625
Mayer, O.H., Harris, J.A., Balasubramanian, S., Shah, S.A., Campbell, R.M.: A comprehensive review of thoracic deformity parameters in scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 23, 2594–2602 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3580-8
Qiu, Y., Mao, S., Wang, B., Liu, Z., Zhu, F., Zhu, Z.: Clinical evaluation of the anterior chest wall deformity in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37, E540–E548 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31823a05e6 (Phila. Pa. 1976)
Kuklo, T.R., Potter, B.K., Lenke, L.G.: Vertebral rotation and thoracic torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 18, 139–147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000159033.89623.bc
Takahashi, S., Suzuki, N., Asazuma, T., Kono, K., Ono, T., Toyama, Y.: Factors of thoracic cage deformity that affect pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Spine 32, 106–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251005.31255.25 (Phila. Pa. 1976)
Easwar, T.R., Hong, J.Y., Yang, J.H., Suh, S.W., Modi, H.N.: Does lateral vertebral translation correspond to Cobb angle and relate in the same way to axial vertebral rotation and rib hump index? A radiographic analysis on idiopathic scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 20, 1095–1105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1702-0
Oskouian, R.J., Shaffrey, C.I.: Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 17, 299–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2006.05.002
Vergari, C., Aubert, B., Lallemant-Dudek, P., Haen, T.X., Skalli, W.: A novel method of anatomical landmark selection for rib cage 3D reconstruction from biplanar radiography. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2018.1537860
Chi, W., Cheng, C., Yeh, W., Chuang, S., Chang, T., Chen, J.: Vertebral axial rotation measurement method. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 1, 8–17 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.10.004
Mehta, M.H.: The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 54–B, 230–243 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.54B2.230
Sevastik, B., Xiong, B., Sevastik, J., Lindgren, U., Willers, U.: The rib vertebral angle asymmetry in idiopathic, neuromuscular and experimentally induced scoliosis. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 37, 107–110 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-881-6-107
Lee, D.: Biomechanics of the thorax: a clinical model of in vivo function. J. Man. Manip. Ther. 1, 13–21 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1179/106698193791069771
Acknowledgements
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. [764644].
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. [764644].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
John Rasmussen owns stock and is a board member of AnyBody Technology A/S, whose software is used for model development.
Pavel Galibarov is employed in AnyBody Technology A/S.
Ethics approval, Consent to participate, Consent for publication
This study was evaluated and approved by the local Research Ethics Committee (Journal number: H17034237). We obtained oral and written consent from the patient, and the study was conducted according to national guidelines and the Helsinki Declaration.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shayestehpour, H., Rasmussen, J., Galibarov, P. et al. An articulated spine and ribcage kinematic model for simulation of scoliosis deformities. Multibody Syst Dyn 53, 115–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-021-09787-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-021-09787-9