Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the effective radiation dose for mutation breeding in purple carrot (Daucus carota L.) and possible variations formed

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Plant breeding allows altering the genetic structure of plants to meet human needs. The use of radiation technology for inducing mutations and -thereby- new phenotypic variants has become increasingly common as a tool for developing new crops. The aim of this study was to determine the effective gamma irradiation dose for inducing mutations in purple carrot.

Methods and results

Increasing gamma radiation doses [0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 Gy] were applied to purple carrot seeds. The irradiated seeds were sown in pots and the emergence and survival rates of the seedlings were analyzed. Considering plant emergence (%) as a response variable, the LD50 dose was 387.5 Gy. Analysis of root length, root width (shoulder diameter) and plant height in control (0 Gy) and irradiated plants (50–600 Gy) revealed an inverse association between these morphological traits and radiation dose. SRAP and ISSR markers were used to identify DNA polymorphisms in irradiated and control plants. The range of amplicons per primer set revealed by ISSR and SRAP markers was 4–10 and 2–13, respectively. In the ISSR analysis of the irradiated carrots (for the 8 doses used), we obtained range values for the average Nei’s gene diversity, Shannon’s information index, and polymorphism information content (PIC) of 0.13–0.25, 0.20–0.35, and 1.39–1.67, respectively, whereas in the SRAP analysis, the range values for these parameters were 0.15–0.25, 0.23–0.37, and 0.43–0.58, respectively. Cluster analysis revealed three main groups; (a) non-irradiated (control) plants, (b) plants from the 600 Gy dose, and (c) a third group with two subgroups: one with individuals from the lowest irradiation doses (50–200 Gy) and a second group with individuals from the highest irradiation doses (300–500 Gy).

Conclusions

This is the first report on determining effective mutagen doses and genetic characterization of induced mutagenesis via gamma irradiation in purple carrot. ISSR and SRAP markers were successful in detecting variations among different levels of mutagen doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vavilov NI (1951) The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botonica 13:1–366

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubatzky VE, Quiros CF, Simon PW (1999) Carrots and related vegetable umbelliferae, crop production science in horticulture. CABI Publishing, New York, pp 294

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simon PW, Pollak L, Clevidence B, Holden J, Haytowitz D (2009) Plant breeding for human nutrition. Plant Breed Rev 31:325–392

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavagnaro PF, Iorizzo M (2019) Carrot anthocyanin diversity, genetics, and genomics. Compendium of Plant Genomes In: Simon P, Iorizzo M, Grzebelus D, Baranski R (eds) The Carrot Genome, Springer Nature Cham, pp 261–279

  5. Mazza G, Cacace JE, Kay CD (2004) Methods of analysis for anthocyanins in plants and biological fluids. J AOAC Int 87:129–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freisleben RA, Lein A (1944) Möglichkeiten und praktische Durchführung der Mutationszüchtung. Kühn-Arhiv 60:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ulukapi K, Nasircilar AG (2015) Developments of gamma ray application on mutation breeding studies in recent years. In: International Conference on Advances in Agricultural, Biological & Environmental Sciences 22–23, London, pp 31–34

  8. Piri I, Babayan M, Tavassoli A, Javaheri M (2011) The use of gamma irradiation in agriculture. Afr J Microbiol Res 5(32):5806–5811

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beyaz R, Yildiz M (2017) The use of gamma irradiation in plant mutation breeding. In: Jurić S (ed) Plant Engineering Intechopen, pp 33–46

  10. Salve KM, More AD (2014) Effect of gamma radiation on seed germination, seedling height and seedling injury in Coriandrum sativum Linn. Int J of Life Sciences 2(3):223–225

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhosale RS, More AD (2014) Effect of gamma radiation on seed germination, seedling height and seedling injury in Withania somnifera (L) Dunal. Int J of Life Sciences 2(3):226–228

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sikder S, Biswas P, Hazra P, Akhtar S, Chattopadhyay A, Badigannavar AM, Souza SFD (2013) Induction of mutation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by gamma irradiation and EMS. Indian J. Genet. 73(4):392–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Puchooa D (2005) In vitro mutation breeding of Anthurium by gamma radiation. Int J Agri Biol 7(1):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sangsiri C, Worawit S, Peerasak S (2005) Gamma radiation induced mutation in mungbean. ScienceAsia 31:251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S (2014) Gamma radiation induced mutations in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilze). Scholarly J Agric Sci 4(4):240–243

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aruna J, Parakash M, Kumar BS (2010) Studies on effect of physical and chemical mutagens on seedling charecters in Brijal (Solanum melongena L.). Int J Curr Res 3:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saleem MY, Mukhtar Z, Cheema AA et al (2005) Induced mutation and in vitro techniques as a method to induce salt tolerance in Basmati rice (Oryza sauva L.). Int J Environ Sci Tech 2(2):141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yaycılı O, Alikamanoğlu S (2012) Induction of Salt-Tolerant Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) mutants with gamma irradiation and characterization of genetic variations via RAPD-PCR analysis. Turk J Biol 36:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buyukdinc DT, Kantoglu KY, Karatas A, Ipek A, Ellialtıoglu SS (2019) Determination of effective mutagen dose for carrot (Daucus carota ssp sativus var atrorubens alef and D carota) callus culture. Int J Sci Technol Res 5(3):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dhakshanamoorthy D, Selvaraj R, Chidambaram ALA (2011) Induced mutagenesis in Jatropha curcas L using gamma rays and detection of DNA polymorphism through RAPD marker. C R Biol 334(1):24–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mudibu J, Nkongolo KKC, Mehes-Smith M, Kalonji-Mbuyi A (2011) Genetic analysis of a soybean genetic pool using ISSR marker: effect of gamma radiation on genetic variability. Int J Plant Breed Genet 5:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rustikawati R, Suprijono E, Romeida A, Herison C, Sutjahjo SH (2012) Identification of M4 gamma irradiated maize mutant based on RAPD markers. AGRIVITA 34(2):161–165

    Google Scholar 

  23. Afrasiab H, Iqbal J (2012) Genetic analysis of somaclonal variants and induced mutants of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) CV. Diamant using RAPD markers. Pak J Bot 44:215–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Taheri S, Abdullah TL, Abdullah NAP, Ahmad Z (2013) Use of inter simple sequence repeat assay for detection of DNA polymorphism induced by gamma rays in Curcuma alismatifolia. HortScience 48:1346–1351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mejri S, Mabrouk Y, Voisinetal M (2014) Variation in quantitative characters of faba bean after seed irradiation and associated molecular changes. Afr J Biotechnol 11(34):8383–8390

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee JH, Han TH (2014) Selection of mutants obtained by gamma ray irradiation and analysis of genetic variation using RAPD markers in Acorus calamus L. Hort Environ Biotechnol 55(3):207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yaycılı O, Sen A, Alikmanoğlu S (2005) Induced of salt tolerance wheat (Triticum aestivum L) mutants with gamma radiation and determining molecular analysis by ISSR. Procedia Environ Sci 29:196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang P, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Mo B (2017) Luo T (2017) Effect of gamma rays on Sophora davidii and detection of DNA polymorphism through ISSR markers. Biomed Res Int 34:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  29. El-Khateeb MA, Eid RA, Mahfouze HA, Ashor HA, Mabrouk RMS (2017) Induction of mutation with gamma radiation in Helichrysum bracteatum L., and identification of mutants by molecular markers. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 6(2):282–293

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Safadi B, Simon PW (1996) Gamma irradiation-induced variation in carrots (Daucus carota L.). J Am soc Hortic Sci 121(4):599–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bovi JE, Valter A, Neto JT (2003) Use of low doses of cobalt-60 gamma radiation on carrot seeds and their effect on plant growth and yield. Acta Hortic 607:41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:1315

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boiteux LS, Fonseca MEN, Simon PW (1999) Effects of plant tissue and DNA purification methods on randomly amplified polymorphic DNA based genetic fingerprinting analysis in carrot. HortScience 124:32–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferriol M, Pico B, Nuez F (2003) Genetic diversity of germplasm collection of Cucurbita pepo using SRAP and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 107(2):271–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yıldız M, Ekbiç E, Düzyaman E, Serçe S, Abak K (2016) Genetic and phenotypic variation of Turkish Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) accessions and their possible relationship with American, Indian and African germplasms. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 25(3):234–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yıldız M, Ekbiç E, Keles D, Şensoy S, Abak K (2011) Use of ISSR, SRAP and RAPD markers to assess genetic diversity in Turkish melons. Sci Hortic 130:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Riek J, Calsyn E, Everaert I, Van Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2001) AFLP based alternatives for the assessment of distinctness, uniformity and stability of sugar beet varieties. Theor Appl Genet 103:1254–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle TJ, Ye Z (2000) Pop Gene 32, Microsoft windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Version 1.32. Edmonton Canada University of Alberta

  39. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:3321–3323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li QH, Wang SX, Zhao YM, Xu J, Gao TT, Ren WJ (2012) Irradiation dose and effect on germination and growth of desert shrub Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. with two gamma irradiation modes. Pak J Bot 44(2):661–666

    Google Scholar 

  41. Harding SS, Johnson SD, Taylor DR, Dixon CA, Turay MY (2012) Effect of gamma rays on seed germination, seedling height, survival percentage and tiller production in some rice varieties cultivated in Sierra Leone. Am J Exp Agric 2:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ramchander S, Ushakumari R, Pillai MA (2015) Lethal dose fixation and sensitivity of rice varieties to gamma radiation. Indian J Agric Res 49:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Naval MM, Zuriaga E, Badenes ML (2013) AFLP analysis of mutations induced by gamma irradiation in ‘Rojo Brillante’ persimmon. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 996. In: V International Symposium on Persimmon, 20 Oct, Wuhan, pp 117–121

  44. Jo YD, Kim SH, Hwang JE, Kim YS, Kang HS, Ki SW, Kwon SJ, Ryu J, Kim JB, Kang SY (2016) Construction of mutation populations by gamma-ray and carbon beam irradiation in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57(6):606–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Olasupo FO, Olori CO, Forster BP, Bado S (2016) Mutagenic effects of gamma radiation on eight accessions of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp). Am J Plant Sci 7:339–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Alvarez-Holguin A, Morales-Nieto CR, Avendano-Arrazate CH, Corrales-Lerma R, Villarreal-Guerrero F, Santellano-Estrada E, Gomez-Simuta Y (2019) Mean lethal dose (LD50) and growth reduction (GR50) due to gamma radiation in Wilman lovegrass (Eragrostis superba). Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 10(1):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xi M, Sun L, Qiu S, Liu J, Xu J, Shi J (2012) In vitro mutagenesis and identification of mutants via ISSR in lily (Lilium longiflorum). Plant Cell Rep 31(6):1043–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Atienzar FA, Conradi M, Evenden AJ, Jha AN, Depledge MH (1999) Qualitative assessment of genotoxicity using random amplified polymorphic DNA: comparison of genomic template stability with key fitness parameter in Daphnia magna exposed to benzo (a) pyrene. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2275–2282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Authors are grateful to Van Yuzuncu Yil University- Scientific Research Projects Coordinating Office for financial support (Project number: FYL-2017–6148).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MY conceptualized and established the methodology, supervised the research study. MY and GY conceived the project. MY, GY, and MK conceived and designed the experiments. MY, GY, and MK performed material preparation, germination analysis and molecular analysis. MY and ND performed field experiments. MY, MK, and PC wrote the paper and organized the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehtap Yildiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to Participate and Publish

All authors read the manuscript and showed their willingness to publish this study.

Data availability

All data needed to conduct this study is provided within the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 82 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yarar, G., Kocak, M., Denli, N. et al. Determination of the effective radiation dose for mutation breeding in purple carrot (Daucus carota L.) and possible variations formed. Mol Biol Rep 49, 5219–5228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06618-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06618-0

Keywords

Navigation