Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular characterization and different expression patterns of the FABP gene family during goat skeletal muscle development

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The FABP (adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein) genes play an important role in intracellular fatty acid transport and considered to be candidate genes for fatness traits in domestic animal. In this study, we cloned the cDNA sequences of goat FABP family genes and their expression patterns were detected by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and quantitative real time RT-PCR. Expression analysis showed that goat FABP1 gene was predominantly expressed in liver, kidney and large intestine. While FABP4 was widely expressed in many tissues with a high expression level was observed in the fat, skeletal muscle, stomach and lung. Notably, FABP2 gene was expressed specifically in small intestine. Moreover, goat FABP3 was expressed at 60 day with the highest level, then significantly (p < 0.01) decreased at the 90 day. No significant expression differences were observed in longissimus dorsi muscles among 3 day, 30 day and 60 day. Goat FABP4 was expressed at 3 day with the lowest level, then significantly (p < 0.01) increased to a peak at the 60 day. In addition, a significant relationship between FABP3 mRNA expression levels and intramuscular fat (IMF) content was observed. These results suggest that the FABP3 and FABP4 may be important genes for meat quality and provides useful information for further studies on their roles in skeletal muscle IMF deposit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baeza E, Medale F, Jurie C et al (2010) Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 4:303–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ono T (2005) Studies of the FABP family: a retrospective. Mol Cell Biochem 277:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerbens F, de Koning DJ, Harders FL, Meuwissen TH, Janss LL et al (2000) The effect of adipocyte and heart fatty acid-binding protein genes on intramuscular fat and backfat content in Meishan crossbred pigs. J Anim Sci 78:552–559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerbens F, Verburg FJ, Van Moerkerk HT, Engel B, Buist W et al (2001) Associations of heart and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein gene expression with intramuscular fat content in pigs. J Anim Sci 79:347–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perez-Enciso M, Clop A, Noguera JL, Ovilo C, Coll A et al (2000) A QTL on pig chromosome 4 affects fatty acid metabolism: evidence from an Iberian by Landrace intercross. J Anim Sci 78:2525–2531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho KH, Kim MJ, Jeon GJ, Chung HY (2011) Association of genetic variants for FABP3 gene with back fat thickness and intramuscular fat content in pig. Mol Biol Rep 38:2161–2166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Han X, Jiang T, Yang H, Zhang Q, Wang W et al (2012) Investigation of four porcine candidate genes (H-FABP, MYOD1, UCP3 and MASTR) for meat quality traits in Large White pigs. Mol Biol Rep 39:6599–6605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barendse W, Bunch RJ, Thomas MB, Harrison BE (2009) A splice site single nucleotide polymorphism of the fatty acid binding protein 4 gene appears to be associated with intramuscular fat deposition in longissimus muscle in Australian cattle. Anim Genet 40:770–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jurie C, Cassar-Malek I, Bonnet M, Leroux C, Bauchart D et al (2007) Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and mitochondrial enzyme activities in muscles as relevant indicators of marbling in cattle. J Anim Sci 85:2660–2669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SH, van der Werf JH, Park EW, Oh SJ, Gibson JP et al (2010) Genetic polymorphisms of the bovine fatty acid binding protein 4 gene are significantly associated with marbling and carcass weight in Hanwoo (Korean Cattle). Anim Genet 41:442–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shin SC, Heo JP, Chung ER (2012) Genetic variants of the FABP4 gene are associated with marbling scores and meat quality grades in Hanwoo (Korean cattle). Mol Biol Rep 39:5323–5330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Q, Guan T, Li H, Bernlohr DA (2009) A novel polymorphism in the chicken adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein gene (FABP4) that alters ligand-binding and correlates with fatness. Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 154:298–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ye MH, Chen JL, Zhao GP, Zheng MQ, Wen J (2010) Associations of A-FABP and H-FABP markers with the content of intramuscular fat in Beijing-You chicken. Anim Biotechnol 21:14–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. You X, Liu Y, Jiang X, Du H, Liu Z et al (2009) Relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms of the H-FABP gene and slaughter and meat quality traits in chicken. Biochem Genet 47:511–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi H, Wang Q, Wang Y, Leng L, Zhang Q et al (2010) Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein: an important gene related to lipid metabolism in chicken adipocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 157:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi H, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Leng L, Li H (2010) Tissue expression characterization of chicken adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and its expression difference between fat and lean birds in abdominal fat tissue. Poult Sci 89:197–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li L, Jiang J, Wang L, Zhong T, Chen B et al (2013) Expression patterns of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1 versus gamma 2, and their association with intramuscular fat in goat tissues. Gene 528:195–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hovenier R, Brascamp EW, Kanis E, van der Werf JH, Wassenberg AP (1993) Economic values of optimum traits: the example of meat quality in pigs. J Anim Sci 71:1429–1433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chmurzynska A (2006) The multigene family of fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs): function, structure and polymorphism. J Appl Genet 47:39–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Storch J, Thumser AE (2010) Tissue-specific functions in the fatty acid-binding protein family. J Biol Chem 285:32679–32683

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Storch J, McDermott L (2009) Structural and functional analysis of fatty acid-binding proteins. J Lipid Res 50(Suppl):S126–S131

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Newberry EP, Kennedy SM, Xie Y, Luo J, Crooke RM et al (2012) Decreased body weight and hepatic steatosis with altered fatty acid ethanolamide metabolism in aged L-Fabp -/- mice. J Lipid Res 53(4):744–754

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baier LJ, Sacchettini JC, Knowler WC, Eads J, Paolisso G et al (1995) An amino acid substitution in the human intestinal fatty acid binding protein is associated with increased fatty acid binding, increased fat oxidation, and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 95:1281–1287

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lagakos WS, Gajda AM, Agellon L, Binas B, Choi V et al (2011) Different functions of intestinal and liver-type fatty acid-binding proteins in intestine and in whole body energy homeostasis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300:G803–G814

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyra M, Ropka-Molik K, Eckert R, Piorkowska K, Oczkowicz M (2011) H-FABP and LEPR gene expression profile in skeletal muscles and liver during ontogenesis in various breeds of pigs. Domest Anim Endocrinol 40:147–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Michal JJ, Zhang ZW, Gaskins CT, Jiang Z (2006) The bovine fatty acid binding protein 4 gene is significantly associated with marbling and subcutaneous fat depth in Wagyu x Limousin F2 crosses. Anim Genet 37:400–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Toplu HD, Goksoy EO, Nazligul A, Kahraman T (2013) Meat quality characteristics of Turkish indigenous Hair goat kids reared under traditional extensive production system: effects of slaughter age and gender. Trop Anim Health Prod 45:1297–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Luccia A, Satriani A, Barone CM, Colatruglio P, Gigli S et al (2003) Effect of dietary energy content on the intramuscular fat depots and triglyceride composition of river buffalo meat. Meat Sci 65:1379–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu T, Zhang Z, Yuan Z, Lo LJ, Chen J et al (2013) Distinctive genes determine different intramuscular fat and muscle fiber ratios of the longissimus dorsi muscles in Jinhua and landrace pigs. PLoS One 8:e53181

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Samulin J, Berget I, Lien S, Sundvold H (2008) Differential gene expression of fatty acid binding proteins during porcine adipogenesis. Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 151:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gardan D, Louveau I, Gondret F (2007) Adipocyte- and heart-type fatty acid binding proteins are both expressed in subcutaneous and intramuscular porcine (Sus scrofa) adipocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 148:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vergara A, Franzese M, Merlino A, Vitagliano L, Verde C et al (2007) Structural characterization of ferric hemoglobins from three antarctic fish species of the suborder notothenioidei. Biophys J 93:2822–2829

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Damon M, Louveau I, Lefaucheur L, Lebret B, Vincent A et al (2006) Number of intramuscular adipocytes and fatty acid binding protein-4 content are significant indicators of intramuscular fat level in crossbred Large White x Duroc pigs. J Anim Sci 84:1083–1092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reiter SS, Halsey CH, Stronach BM, Bartosh JL, Owsley WF et al (2007) Lipid metabolism related gene-expression profiling in liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in crossbred Duroc and Pietrain Pigs. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics 2:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Grants from Scientific Researcher Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (10ZA049), and the national Spark key Program (2012GA810001), and Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2011NZ0003, 2011NZ0099-36).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongping Zhang.

Additional information

Linjie Wang and Li Li have contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11033_2014_3759_MOESM1_ESM.rtf

Fig. S1 Multiple amino acid sequence alignments of goat, human, mouse and pig FABP1, FABP2, FABP3 and FABP4 genes. Protein sequences were obtained from GenBank: NP_001434.1 (FABP1-Homo sapiens); NP_001004046.1 (FABP1-Sus scrofa); NP_059095.1 (FABP1-Mus musculus); NP_032006.1 (FABP2-Mus musculus); NP_000125.2 (FABP2-Homo sapiens); NP_001026950.1 (FABP2-Sus scrofa); NP_004093.1 (FABP3-Homo sapiens); NP_034304.1 (FABP3-Mus musculus); NP_001093401.1 (FABP3-Sus scrofa); NP_001433.1 (FABP4-Homo sapiens); NP_077717.1 (FABP4-Mus musculus); NP_001002817.1 (FABP4-Sus scrofa). Conserved amino acids are highlighted. The putative lipocalin and fatty acid binding protein signatures in their central portion underlined. (RTF 157 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Li, L., Jiang, J. et al. Molecular characterization and different expression patterns of the FABP gene family during goat skeletal muscle development. Mol Biol Rep 42, 201–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3759-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3759-4

Keywords

Navigation