Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genomic selection for morphological and yield-related traits using genome-wide SNPs in oil palm

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oil palm is the most important oil crop worldwide. Colombia is the fourth largest producer, primarily relying on production from interspecific hybrids, derived from crosses between Elaeis oleifera and Elaeis guineensis (OxG). However, conventional breeding can take up to 20 years to generate a new variety. Therefore, reducing the breeding cycle while improving the genetic gain for complex traits is desirable. Genomic selection (GS) is an approach with the potential to achieve this goal. In this study, we evaluated 431 F1 interspecific hybrids (OxG) and 444 backcrosses (BC1) for morphological and yield-related traits. Genomic predictions were performed with the G-BLUP model using three different population datasets for training the model: the same population (TRN1), the other population (TRN2), and both populations (TRN1+2). Higher multi-family prediction accuracies were obtained for foliar area (0.3 in OxG) and trunk height (0.47 in BC1) when the model was trained with TRN1. Single-family prediction accuracies were lower in the OxG compared to BC1 families for traits such as trunk diameter, trunk height, bunch number, and yield using TRN1. Conversely, lower prediction accuracies were obtained for most traits when the model was trained using TRN2 (< 0.1). Multi-trait models showed a substantial increase of the predictions for traits such as yield (0.22 for OxG and 0.44 for BC1), because of the genetic correlations between traits. The results herein highlighted the potential of GS for parental selection in OxG and BC1 populations, but further studies are required to improve the models to select individuals by their genetic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to acknowledge William Tolosa for his support during sample collection and Paola Delgadillo for her support in the BC1 population DNA extraction. The access to the oil palm individuals complies with the genetic resource agreement for scientific research without commercial interest No. 74, signed between Agrosavia and Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR) of Colombia. The authors want to thank Shane Teachworth for his review of this document for English grammar and style.

Funding

This research was funded by the Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia), an entity under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MADR) from Colombia, with funds obtained under law 1731 of 2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GAGM processed the phenotypic and genotypic data, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript. JAOG processed the genotypic data and critically revised the manuscript. LPM conducted the field experiments, collected the data, discussed, reviewed, and revised the manuscript. SB designed the field experiments, reviewed, and revised the manuscript. LSB designed and supervised the genotypic work and critically revised the manuscript. MLC developed the genomic selection models and drafted and revised the manuscript. FEER designed and supervised the genotypic work and overall data analysis and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marco Lopez-Cruz or Felix E. Enciso-Rodríguez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. S1

Boxplots showing the average phenotypic distribution of morphological and yield-related traits, in OxG and BC1 oil palm. A. by population, B. by family. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (p< 0.001) and by letters (p< 0.05). TD: Trunk Diameter, TH: Trunk Height, FA: Foliar Area, BW: Bunch, BN: Bunch number (PNG 827 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIF 13688 kb)

Supplementary Fig. S2

Conventional vs. genomic selection-based breeding in oil palm. Traditional breeding relies on the generation of multiple crosses, for which progeny is evaluated and selected in the field for up to 20 years to finally generate one new oil palm variety. Genomic selection will reduce the breeding cycle by up to seven years, selecting superior lines, based on their genetic merit, using whole-genome regressions (PNG 548 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIFF 2767 kb)

Supplementary File S1

SNPs dataset identified in OxG and BC1 using the E. guineensis reference genome (TXT 15327 kb)

Supplementary Table S1

List of the OxG and BC1 oil palms used in this study (XLSX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garzón-Martínez, G.A., Osorio-Guarín, J.A., Moreno, L.P. et al. Genomic selection for morphological and yield-related traits using genome-wide SNPs in oil palm. Mol Breeding 42, 71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-022-01341-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-022-01341-5

Keywords

Navigation