Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self versus other oriented social motivation, not lack of empathic or moral ability, explains behavioral outcomes in children with high theory of mind abilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although traditionally it was believed that having advanced Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities led to social competence and prosocial behaviors in children, it has also been shown that some children use their high ToM abilities to strategically manipulate others instead of acting prosocially towards them. It is an important developmental task to understand the factors contributing to this behavioral divergence for children with advanced ToM understanding, which also has significant practical implications for bullying interventions. We contend that this divergence cannot be explained by a lack of moral competence or empathy, but that the existing evidence lends itself better to a motivational explanation. We propose that the direction of social motivation varies across children and the self versus other oriented social motivation determines if children will use their developed morality and empathy competencies in social interactions to act prosocially or instead cognitively divert moral and empathic emotions to avoid negative feelings about manipulating others. We show how self versus other orientation has been used as a legitimate distinction to inform other domains of psychology and conclude by discussing possible correlates and precursors of this difference in the direction of social orientation in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astington, J. W. (2003). Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind (pp. 13–38). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 151–165. doi:10.1080/02699939508409006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. L., Smetana, J. G., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2017). Following my head and my heart: Integrating preschoolers’ empathy, theory of mind, and moral judgments. Child Development, 88, 597–611. doi:10.1111/cdev.12605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 125–135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bariso, J. (2016). 11 brutal truths about emotions that you really need to hear. Retrieved August 24, 2017, from https://www.inc.com/justin-bariso/11-brutal-truths-about-emotions-that-you-really-need-to-hear.html.

  • Barlow, A., Qualter, P., & Stylianou, M. (2010). Relationships between Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence and theory of mind in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 78–82. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejanin, A., Chételat, G., Laisney, M., Pélerin, A., Landeau, B., Merck, C., … Desgranges, B. (2017). Distinct neural substrates of affective and cognitive theory of mind impairment in semantic dementia. Social Neuroscience, 12, 287–302. doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1168314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(83)90029-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerger, E. A., & Hoffman, A. J. (2015). Character development in the school years: Relations among theory of mind, moral identity, and positive and negative behavior toward peers. In C. B. Miller, R. M. Furr, A. Knobel, W. Fleeson (Eds.) Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology (pp. 467–489). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosacki, S., & Astington, J. W. (1999). Theory of mind in preadolescence: Relations between social understanding and social competence. Social Development, 8, 237–255. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bzdok, D., Schilbach, L., Vogeley, K., Schneider, K., Laird, A. R., Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012). Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Structure and Function, 217, 783–796. doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D., Hutcherson, C., Ferguson, A., Scheffer, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Empathy is a choice: People are empathy misers because they are cognitive misers. Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2887903. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887903.

  • Cameron, D., Inzlicht, M., & Cunningham, W. A. (2015). Empathy is actually a choice. New York Times, p. 12.

  • Capage, L., & Watson, A. C. (2001). Individual differences in theory of mind, aggressive behavior, and social skills in young children. Early Education and Development, 12, 613–628. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1204_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., Eisenberg, N., & Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Cognitive processes and prosocial behaviors among children: The role of affective attributions and reconciliations. Developmental Psychology, 27, 456–461. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. M., Green, M. C., & Vacharkulksemsuk, T. (2016). Beyond perspective-taking: Mind-reading motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 358–374. doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9544-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 231–239. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2013). Volunteer work in youth organizations: predicting distinct aspects of volunteering behavior from self-and other-oriented motives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 456–466. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01029.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70, 853–865. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Due, P., Holstein, B. E., Lynch, J., Diderichsen, F., Gabhain, S. N., Scheidt, P., & Currie, C. (2005). Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 128–132. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Shea, C. L., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. P. (1991). Empathy-related responding and cognition: A “chicken and the egg” dilemma. Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, 2, 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760–768. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N., & Waytz, A. G. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, 5th edn., pp. 498–541). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esperger, Z., & Bereczkei, T. (2012). Machiavellianism and spontaneous mentalization: One step ahead of others. European Journal of Personality, 26, 580–587. doi:10.1002/per.859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, L., & Keller, M. (2009). Are the competent the morally good? Perspective taking and moral motivation of children involved in bullying. Social Development, 18, 798–816. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00516.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, S. M., McCleery, J. P., & Oberman, L. M. (2014). Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: Different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 137, e272-e272. doi:10.1093/brain/awt364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539. doi:10.1002/ab.20153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 603–608. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 56–68. doi:10.1002/ab.21502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godman, M., Nagatsu, M., & Salmela, M. (2014). The social motivation hypothesis for prosocial behavior. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44, 563–587. doi:10.1177/0048393114530841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Garibello, C., & Talwar, V. (2015). Can you read my mind? Age as a moderator in the relationship between theory of mind and relational aggression. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, 552–559. doi:10.1177/0165025415580805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, M., Perren, S., Stadelmann, S., & von Klitzing, K. (2011). Emotional symptoms from kindergarten to middle childhood: associations with self-and other-oriented social skills. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 3–15. doi:10.1007/s00787-010-0139-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1192–1205. doi:10.1037/dev0000140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F. M., & Singer, T. (2015). Dissecting the social brain: Introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain–behavior relations for empathy and Theory of Mind. NeuroImage, 122, 6–19. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2014). Dissociating the ability and propensity for empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 164–166. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., & Lester, S. W. (1996). The effect of other-oriented values on decision making: A test of propositions of a theory of concern for others in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 234–245. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koster-Hale, J., Bedny, M., & Saxe, R. (2014). Thinking about seeing: Perceptual sources of knowledge are encoded in the theory of mind brain regions of sighted and blind adults. Cognition, 133, 65–78. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krach, S., Paulus, F. M., Bodden, M., & Kircher, T. (2010). The rewarding nature of social interactions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 1–3. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krettenauer, T., Malti, T., & Sokol, B. W. (2008). The development of moral emotion expectancies and the happy victimizer phenomenon: A critical review of theory and application. International Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 221–235. doi:10.3233/DEV-2008-2303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, B., & Nettle, D. (2006). Higher-order theory of mind and social competence in school-age children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 231–244. doi:10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.3-4.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, M. V., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T., Wheelwright, S. J., Sadek, S. A., Suckling, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1623–1635. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigro, A., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., & Baumgartner, E. (2014). Mind reading skills and empathy: Evidence for nice and nasty ToM behaviors in school-aged children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 581–590. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9722-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01271.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIlwain, D. (2003). Bypassing empathy: A Machiavellian theory of mind and sneaky power. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 39–66). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, H., Gazzola, V., Boer, Den, Bartels, J. A., A. A., & Keysers, C. (2013). Reduced spontaneous but relatively normal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 136, 2550–2562. doi:10.1093/brain/awt190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Feudo, Lo, G (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: A cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 515–530. doi:10.1002/ab.10060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324–344. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2010). The problem of moral motivation and the happy victimizer phenomenon: Killing two birds with one stone. In B. Latzko & T. Malti (Eds.) Children’s moral emotions and moral cognition: Developmental and educational perspectives. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 129 (pp. 55–75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2010). The problem of moral motivation and the happy victimizer phenomenon: Killing two birds with one stone. In B. Latzko & T. Malti (Eds.) Children’s moral emotions and moral cognition: Developmental and educational perspectives. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (vol. 129, pp. 55–75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (1998). The development of moral understanding and moral motivation. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 587–603. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)00056-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oda, N. (1991). Motives of volunteer works: Self-and other-oriented motives. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 50, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. L., Lopez-Duran, N., Lunkenheimer, E. S., Chang, H., & Sameroff, A. J. (2011). Individual differences in the development of early peer aggression: Integrating contributions of self-regulation, theory of mind, and parenting. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 253–266. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000775.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 3–7. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1288–1309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 195–209. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. (2014). Theory of mind understanding and empathic behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 16–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C., Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2005). Steps in theory-of-mind development for children with deafness or autism. Child Development, 76, 502–517. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00859.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Strategic choice in negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(2), 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368–376. doi:10.2307/255985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., David Zelazo, P., Boivin, M., …, Séguin, J. R. (2010). Relations between theory of mind and indirect and physical aggression in kindergarten: Evidence of the moderating role of prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 19, 535–555. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00552.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repacholi, B., Slaughter, V., Pritchard, M., & Gibbs, V. (2003). Theory of mind, Machiavellianism, and social functioning in childhood. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 67–97). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. (2008). Perceived parental conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of young adults’ self- versus other-oriented prosocial tendencies. Journal of Personality, 76, 513–534. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00494.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K. (1989). Temperament in childhood: A framework. In G. Kohnstamm, J. Bates & M. K. Rothbart (Eds.), Temperament in childhood (pp. 59–73). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruedy, N. E., Moore, C., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2013). The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 531–548. doi:10.1037/a0034231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, D., & Apperly, I. A. (2010). There is more to mind reading than having theory of mind concepts: New directions in theory of mind research. Infant and Child Development, 19, 443–454. doi:10.1002/icd.678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R. (2005). Against simulation: The argument from error. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 174–179. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R. (2009). The neural evidence for simulation is weaker than I think you think it is. Philosophical Studies, 144, 447–456. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9353-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Editorial: The neuroscience of theory of mind. Social Neuroscience, 1(3–4), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, V. (2011). Early adoption of Machiavellian attitudes: Implications for children’s interpersonal relationships. In B. T. Christopher, P. K. Kerig, K. K. Stellwagen, T. D. Barry (Eds). Narcissism and Machiavellianism in youth: Implications for the development of adaptive and maladaptive behavior. (pp. 177–192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12352-010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, R. L., Morse, E. A., & Savage, G. T. (1999). A test of the motivations underlying choice of conflict strategies in the dual-concern model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 25–44. doi:10.1108/eb022817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (1984). Notes toward an interactionist-motivational theory of the determinants and development of (pro)social behavior. Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior (pp. 29–49). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (2002). Beyond sympathy and empathy: Adam Smith’s concept of fellow-feeling. Economics and Philosophy, 18, 63–87. doi:10.1017/S0266267102001086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., & Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 443–456. doi:10.1348/000709900158227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, 117–127. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450. doi:10.1348/026151099165384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 143–173. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2001). The psychology of own versus others’ treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1324–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 86–103. doi:10.1037/a0032540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S., Moore, K., Crossman, A. M., & Talwar, V. (2016). The role of executive functions and theory of mind in children’s prosocial lie-telling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 256–266. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1608–1647. doi:10.1037/a0037679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ceymi Doenyas

Authors
  1. Ceymi Doenyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ceymi Doenyas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doenyas, C. Self versus other oriented social motivation, not lack of empathic or moral ability, explains behavioral outcomes in children with high theory of mind abilities. Motiv Emot 41, 683–697 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9636-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9636-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation