Abstract
Carsharing (CS) plays an important role in environmental improvements and can be managed as a low-carbon transportation innovation to mitigate the transportation-related carbon footprint. By conducting a questionnaire survey regarding people’s willingness to adopt CS, as well as constructing metrological models to estimate the environmental consequences of the People’s Republic of China’s (hereinafter “China”) CS market, we find that environmental consequences are closely associated with the CS market. The present study makes a significant breakthrough in the field by building a bridge between them. Previous studies only estimated the environmental impact of CS independently. Analysis shows that a high level of people’s acceptance of CS predetermines the market trend and its continuity. Environmental benefits increase with market size. Results suggest that in 2017 alone, 1.69 × 109 million joules ( MJ) of energy savings and an equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction of 13,6000 tons were due to China’s CS market. During the same period, China’s CS market size increased from 430 million Renminbi (RMB) in 2016 to 1.729 billion RMB in 2017. A greater magnitude of the impact is predicted in 2020 and 2025, according to an analysis of China’s lasting CS market. The impact of CS on parking land use can be quantified through a metrological model. Notably, this is the first study to build a combined dynamic and static model for estimating the reduced parking demands with regard to land use due to CS. Results suggest that in 2017, 4.68 × 109 square meters (m2) of land use savings was theoretically due to China’s CS market. While previous studies have qualitatively linked reduced vehicle ownership and parking demand, few studies have quantified the magnitude of that impact, and no models have been developed. Such complementarity makes it possible to use multiple methods in a single research program, including a mixture of quantitative and qualitative approaches. While CS originated in Europe and America, numerous studies have examined the environmental impact of CS operations worldwide. Surveys in Europe indicate that per CS user reduces CO2 emissions by 50% and that the local environmental quality has been improved by CS. An estimated annual reduction of 0.58 tons of CO2-equivalent (CO2e) per household member per year was reported in North America due to observed changes in household driving. Analysis shows that mode shifts from public transit or private car usage to CS vehicles result in an average of 146–312 kilograms (kg) of CO2 reduction per member per year in Ulm, Germany, and that employing hybrid vehicles and electric vehicles (EVs) can reduce CO2 emissions by approximately 35% and 65%, respectively, in Lisbon, Portugal. Additionally, CS users reduce transportation-related carbon dioxide emissions by up to 45–55% per household. Results suggest that upon joining a CS organization, current CS members in the United States of America (USA) reduce their average individual transportation energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by approximately 51%. With regard to the impact of CS on parking demands, results suggest that overall parking needs are reduced owing to the reduced volume of the vehicles caused by the adoption of CS. Additionally, policy implications affect CS operations greatly. Keen interest from policymakers gives a further boost to CS with regard to parking space and synergies with other mobility modes. Accordingly, recommendations for sustainable improvement of CS’s environmental benefits are as follows: CS systems should complement public transportation, as well as the proliferation of fuel-efficient CS EVs; CS operations should share preferential policies on energy savings and emission reductions; the induction of collateral environmental benefits in the context of intermodal supply, in consideration of the possible rebound effects of CS; the certification of credits for CS environmental impacts. The analysis presented herein is aimed at helping policymakers better appreciate the environmental contributions of the CS market, support the market continuously, and provide a platform for the exchange of experience (e.g., arguably, generalization of China’s CS’s operation pattern characteristic of a large proportion of new EV use in the CS market) and learn from each other in mitigating climate change in the transportation sector. We conclude with a summary of key findings and recommendations for policy formulation and future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Analysys (2017) Special Analysis Report on 2018 China Internet CS Market. http://www.100ec.cn/detail%2D%2D6449625.html . Cited 23 April 2018
Analysys (2019). Annual comprehensive analysis report on China’s CS (2019) https://www.gcsrental.com/home/index.html . Cited 23 March 2019
Baptista P, Melo S, Rolim C (2014) Energy, environmental and mobility impacts of carsharing systems. Empirical results from Lisbon, Portugal. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 111(2014):28–37
Roland Berger (2017) How does CS succeed in China? https://www.useit.com.cn/thread-15060-1-1.html . Cited 12 April 2018
Berggren C, Magnusson T (2012) Reducing automotive emissions—the potentials of combustion engine technologies and the power of policy. Energy Policy 41:636–643
Briceno T., Peters G., Solli C., and Hertwich E. (2004) Using Life Cycle Approaches to evaluate sustainable consumption programs: carsharing. Presented at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology Industrial Ecology Programme, Trondheim, Norway, 2004
Catalano M, Lo Casto B, Migliore M (2008) Car sharing demand estimation and urban transport demand modelling using stated preference techniques. Eur Transp 40:33–50
CBNData (2017) 2017 Big data observation of China’s sharing travel industry. http://www.199it.com/archives/609431.html. Cited 16 March 2018
Cervero, R., A. Golub, and B. Nee. (2007), City carshare: longer-term travel demand and car ownership impacts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, 2007, pp. 70–80
Chen TD, Kockelman KM (2016) Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 47:276–284
China Automotive Technology Research Center( CATRC ), Nissan (China) Investment Co., Ltd. , Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd. (2018) Development report on China’s new energy vehicle industry. Social Science Literature Publishing House, Yearly books Publishing Branch. Beijing, 2018 1st edition. pp. 001-403. ISBN 978-7-5201-3293-0
Csdn.net (2018) Sharing economy-research report on CS market. https://blog.csdn.net/qq_37923073/article/details/81779009.Cited 18 March 2018
Department for Transport (2004) Making Car Sharing and Car Clubs Work: Final Report. DfT, London
District Department of Transportation. On-street carsharing program. Available online: https://ddot.dc. gov/page/street-carsharing-program . Cited 23 November 2018
Doka, G. and Ziegler, S. (2001) Complete Life Cycle Assessment for Vehicle Models of the Mobility Carsharing Fleet Switzerland. Presented at The 1st Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2001. http://www.strc.ch/conferences/2001/doka.pdf . Cited 21 November 2018
Druckman A, Chitnis M, Sorrell S, Jackson T (2011) Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. Energy Policy 39(2):3575–3581
Engel-Yan J, Passmore D (2013) Carsharing and car ownership at the building scale: examining potential for flexible parking requirements. J Am Plan Assoc 79(1):82–91
Finkhorn J, Muller M (2011) What will be the environmental effects of new free- floating carsharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecol Econ 70(8):1519–1528
Gcsrental.com (2018a) Evercard, as the representative of sharing travel, has a dialogue with the capital market-sharing travel leads to a better life https://www.gcsrental.com/home/index.html. Cited 23 December 2018
Gcsrental.com (2018b) Evercard, as the representative of CS operations , hosts the sub-forum of electric vehicle conference with 100 attendees (2018) in China. https://www.gcsrental.com/home/index.html. Cited 26 December 2018
Gcsrental.com (2018c) Report of NEVs sharing development in China 2017. https://www.gcsrental.com/home/index.html. Cited 21 December 2018
Han GY(2017) Activating urban resources to solve parking dilemma. http://www.zgjtb.com/2017-11/15/content_131954.htm. Zgjtb Net, Beijing, P. R. China. Cited 16 September 2018
Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the Rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective. J Ind Ecol 9(1-2):85–98
Hu SP, Zheng SJ (2017) Research on design of CS operation management system. Highways Automot Appl 183:30–33,52
iiMedia Research (2017) 2016 - 2017 China internet CS market research report. http://www.iimedia.cn/51450.html . Cited 23 March 2018
iiMedia Research (2018) 2017-2018 China shared travel annual development report. https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/61794.html. Cited 21 December 2018
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014 synthesis report summary for policymakers. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Jiyeon Jung, Yoonmo Koo (2018) Analyzing the effects of car sharing services on the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions , sustainability. 2018,10,539.Available: www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Lei S, Chi C (2010) Carsharing-the reform of automobile consumption pattern. Vehicle Reviews . pp.1-3
Litman T (2000) Evaluating carsharing benefits. Transp Res Rec 1702:31–35
Lv XF (2017) Research on the dilemma and countermeasures of CS development —— a comparative study with sharing bicycle. Modern Bus Trade Ind 2017(19):9–11
Mao XQ, Yang SQ, Liu Q, Tu JJ, Jaccard M (2012) Achieving CO2 emission reduction and the co-benefits of local air pollution abatement in the transportation sector of China. Environ Sci Pol 21:1–13
Martin EW, Shaheen SA (2011a) Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 12(4):1074–1086
Martin, E.W. and Shaheen, S.A. (2011b) The impact of carsharing on household vehicle ownership. Access 38 http://wwwuctcnet/access/38/access38_carsharing_ownershippdf Cited 28 June 2018
Martin E, Shaheen S, Lidicker J(2010) Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings -Results from North American Shared-Use Vehicle Survey.Transportation Research Record 2143,150–158
Materials Research Institute of the Ministry of Transport and Communications ( MRIMTC)and TOGO (2017) Analysis Report on CS Trips in China's First Tier Cities.
Meijkamp R (1998) Changing consumer behaviour through eco-efficient services: an empirical study of carsharing in the Netherlands. Bus Strateg Environ 7(4):234–244
Millard-Ball A. 2005 Car-sharing: where and how it succeeds. In Transportation research board; The National Academies Press: Washington
Millard-Ball, A., Murray, G., Schure, J., Fox, C. and Burkhardt J. (2005)Carsharing: where and how it succeeds. Transportation Research Board, Washington
Mohurd.gov (2016) GB /T 51149-2016 National standard of urban parking planning code of P.R.China, Parking Lot Design Requirements. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201607/t20160722_228280.html. MOHURD, Beijing, P.R. China. Cited 16 April 2018
Michiko Namazu, Hadi Dowlatabadi, (2015) Characterizing the GHG emission impacts of carsharing: a case of Vancouver. Environmental Research Letters 10(12):124017
Ndrc.gov.cn (2016) National new urbanization plan (2014-2020). http://ghs.Ndrc.gov.cn.cn/zttp/xxczhjs/ghzc/201605/t20160505_800839.html. NDRC, Beijing, P.R. China .Cited 15 April 2018
Nijland, H.; van Meerkerk, J.; Hoen, A. 2015 Impact of carsharing on mobility and CO2 emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. PBL Publication Number 1842. Available online: http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/PBL_2015_Note%20Impact%20of%20car%20sharing_1842.pdf. Cited 28 June 2018
People.com.cn (2018). Strenthening cooperation to promote the multilateral process of global climate (International Perspective), http://world.people.com.cn/n1/2018/1210/c1002-30452372.html. People.com.cn, China Daily, Beijing, P.R. China . Cited 18 July 2019.
PricewaterhouseCoopers , Nanfang Daily and South+News Client (2017) Sharing travel at the right time-a report on the current situation and trend of CS in China. https://www.sohu.com/a/149448992_582335 . Cited 15 April 2018.
Regina R, Clewlow (2016) Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: results from the San Francisco Bay Area Regina R. Transp Policy:158–164
Ryden C., Morin E. (2005) Mobility services for urban sustainability, environmental assessment, Report WP 6. Stockholm
Seba T (2014) Clean disruption of energy and transportation, translated by Qin Hanyan, Zhang Jin, Yu Guiyong, 2018, Changsha, Hunan. Sci Technol Press 2018:127–178 978-7-5357-9184-9
Shaheen S, Mallery MA, Kingsley KJ (2012) Personal vehicle sharing services in North America. Res Transp Bus Manag 3:71–81
Shi SC (2017) Analysis on CS development in Binhai New District, Tianjin Urban Transportation pp 64-67.
Sorrell S (2007) The Rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. United Kingdom Energy Research Centre report, October 2007. http://aida.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/documents/ UK_ReboundEffectReport.pdf
Stasko TH, Buck AB, Gao HO (2013) Carsharing in a university setting: impacts on vehicle ownership, parking demand, and mobility in Ithaca, NY. Transp Policy 30:262–268
Susan AS, Mollyanne M, Kamill W (2003)U.S. Shared-use vehicle survey findings: opportunities and obstacles for carsharing and station car growth. California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2003-20 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/69x684m2 pp.1-17
UN-DESA (2017)Total population (both sexes combined) by five-year age group, region, subregion and country, 1950-2100 (thousands). Author. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ . Cited 16 November 2018
Wang, M., E. W. Martin and S. A. Shaheen (2012). Carsharing in shanghai, China: Analysis of behavioral response to a local survey and potential competition. Transportation Research Record 2319(1): 86-95
Wang ZP, Deng JJ, Sun FC , Liu P(2018)Carsharing-reconstructing the transportation with sharing economy. Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing. 2018. pp.30-126. ( In Chinese) ISBN: 978-7-111-60008-4
Georg Wilke, Daniel Bongardt (2007) Future of car-sharing in Germany: customer potential estimation, diffusion and ecological effect. ECEEE 2007 SUMMER STUDY • SAVING ENERGY – JUST DO IT! PANEL 8. TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY. pp.1747-1755
World Bank (2018) CO2 emissions from transport (% of total fuel combustion). Available at https://dataworldbankorg/indicator/ENCO2TRANZS?locations=CN Cited 16 November 2018
Xianjichina.com (2019) China’s oil consumption will reach a peak of 720 million tons in 2025. https://www.xianjichina.com/news/details_99485.html. National Energy Report. Beijing, P.R. China .Cited 15 April 2018. Cited 28 November 2018
Xu HL (2018) Analysis on the competitiveness of sharing cars based on Porter’s five forces model. Modern Bus Trade Ind 2:65–67
Yan JY (2015) Thoughts on Uber’s enlightment and leading global sharing economy development. Commercial Res 794(19):13–17
Yi JL (2015) When official vehicles reform meets NEVs CS. Auto Horizon 8:100–102
Taekwan Yoon, Chris R. Cherry. (2015) EV (electric vehicle) sharing demand estimation –a case study of Beijing, China [J], EVS28 International Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition . pp. 1-11.
Zhou XQ (2017) Development research of carsharing. Times Agric Mach 44(9):126–128
Zhou B, Kockelman KM (2011) Opportunities for and impacts of carsharing: a survey of the Austin, Texas market. Int J Sustain Transp 5(3):135–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Te, Q., Lianghua, C. Carsharing: mitigation strategy for transport-related carbon footprint. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 25, 791–818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09893-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09893-2