Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The personalized medicine discourse: archaeology and genealogy

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personalized Medicine (PM) is an evolving and often missinterpreted concept and no agreement of personalization exist. We examined the PM discourse towards foucauldian archeological and genealogical analysis to understand the meaning of “personalization” in medicine. In the archaeological analysis, the historical evolution is characterized by the coexistence of two epistemologies: the holistic vision and the omic sciences. The genealogical analysis shows how these epistemologies may affect the meaning of “person” and, consequently, the ontology of patients. Additionally, substitutions/confusions of the term PM are related to continuously evolving medical knowledge and new technologies; different etymological roots of “personalization” and “person”; and cultural differences. In conclusion, if the definition of “personalization” in medicine is not clear, patients might get wrong expectations about what is achievable for their health. Therefore, epistemological trends should not be separated as they drive same goals: providing accurate diagnosis and treatments based on large data to predict disease progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MD wrote the manuscript in consultation with FL, AC, AM, GS. AC and MD equally contributed to conceptualize the article. AM helped conceptualizing the manuscript to fully address the contents according to the reviewers’ observations. MD with support of FL searched and reviewed literature. FL insured conceptual fluency. GS initiated and supervised the project. All authors discussed and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marika D’Oria.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cesario, A., Lohmeyer, F.M., D’Oria, M. et al. The personalized medicine discourse: archaeology and genealogy. Med Health Care and Philos 24, 247–253 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09997-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09997-6

Keywords

Navigation