Skip to main content
Log in

“Texture” Software Suite for Qualitative Analysis of Preferred Orientation of Crystallites in Metals and Alloys Using Diffraction Techniques

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

This work presents a newly developed “Texture” software suite for quantitative analysis of the preferred orientation of crystallites in metals and alloys by diffraction techniques. A description of the theoretical foundations of texture analysis and its instrumental implementation is provided. The software functionalities are illustrated, which are used to construct, model, and analyze direct and inverse pole figures, as well as calculate the orientation distribution function by the ADC method and reconstruct pole figures. The results of a comparative study of the complete pole figures constructed based on experimental diffraction data and those calculated based on the orientation distribution function, which has been computed from a series of incomplete unnormalized pole figures, are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. L. Lobanov, A. S. Yurovskii, N. I. Kardonina, and G. M. Rusakov, Methods for Studying Material Textures [in Russian], Izd. Ural. Univ., Yekaterinburg (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Viglin, “Quantitative measure of the texture of polycrystalline material. Textural function,” Fizika Tverdogo Tela (FTT), 2, No. 10, 2463–2476 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. Roe, “Description of crystallite orientation in polycrystalline materials: General solution to pole figures inversion,” J. Appl. Phys., 36, No. 6, 2024–2031 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H.-J. Bunge, “Zur Darstellung allgemeiner Texturen,” Z. Metallkde., 56, 872–874 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H.-J. Bunge, Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Cuvellier Verlag, Göttingen (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Matthies, G. W. Vinel, and K. Helming, Standard Distributions in Texture Analysis, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Pawlik, J. Pospiech, and K. Lücke, “The ODF approximation from pole figures with the aid of the ADC method,” Textures and Microstructures, No. 14, 25–30 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. M. Ivanova and D. I. Nikolayev, Phys. Status Solidi B, 228, 825–836 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. I. Ivanova.

Additional information

Translated from Metallurg, Vol. 67, No. 7, pp. 127–134, July, 2023

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanova, T.I., Nikolaev, D.I., Dmitriev, D.A. et al. “Texture” Software Suite for Qualitative Analysis of Preferred Orientation of Crystallites in Metals and Alloys Using Diffraction Techniques. Metallurgist 67, 1056–1067 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-023-01596-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-023-01596-z

Keywords

Navigation