Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Effect of Operating Conditions on the Resistance of Steels Used in H2S-Containing Environments at Hydrocarbon Production Facilities

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

Corrosion resistance in hydrogen sulfide-containing environments of the main structural steels used at infrastructure facilities of gas fields has been investigated. The rates of corrosion and the composition of the resulting corrosion products, which differs for different steels, were determined. The phase composition of the resulting products (crystalline or X-ray amorphous) affects their protective ability. It was found that under the moisture condensation conditions, a localized pitting damage occurs under unstable corrosion products. It was determined that dangerous corrosion consequences, typical for hydrogenation under the hydrogen sulfide corrosion conditions, become evident on the studied carbon and low-alloyed steel samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. A. Gafarov, A. A. Goncharov, and V. M. Kushnarenko, Corrosion and Protection of the Equipment of Oil and Gas Fields containing Hydrogen Sulfide [in Russian], Nedra, Moscow (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. R. Kantyukov, D. N. Zapevalov, and R. K. Vagapov, “Hazard assessment of the internal carbon dioxide corrosion of the field pipelines at the gas and gas condensate fields,” Bezopasnost’ Truda v Promyshlennosti, No. 2, 56–62 (2021); DOI: https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2021-2-56-62.

  3. D. Zapevalov and R. Vagapov, “Possibilities and limitations of the organization of anticorrosion protection at gas production facilities,” E3S Web of Conf., 225, 03002 (2021); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202122503002.

  4. R. K. Vagapov and D. N. Zapevalov, “Corrosion activity of operating conditions for the steel equipment and pipelines in the plants extracting COa-containing gases,” Metallurgist, 65, No. 1-2, 50–61 (2021); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-021-01132-x.

  5. P. P. Slugin and A. V. Polyanskii, “Optimal method of countering carbon dioxide corrosion of pipelines at the Bovanenkovo NGKM,” Nauka i Tekhnika v Gazovoi Promyshlennosti, 74, No. 2, 104–109 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Yu. Koryakin, D. V. Dikamov, I. V. Kolinchenko, et al., “Experience of selecting corrosion inhibitors for protection against carbon dioxide corrosion of the objects of the second section of the Achimov deposits of the Urengoy oil and gas condensate field,” Oborudovaniye i Tekhnologii dlya Neftegazovogo Komspleksa, No. 6, 48–55 (2018); DOI: https://doi.org/10.30713/1999-6934-2018-6-48-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. I. Baidin, “Experience of countering carbon dioxide corrosion at the Yubileiny NGKM,” Nauka i Tekhnika v Gazovoi Promyshlennosti, No. 3 (83), 3–8 (2020).

  8. I. L. Rozenfeld, L. V. Frolova, and V. M. Brusnikina, “Investigation of the corrosion and hydrogen absorption of steel and inhibition of these processes in aqueous media containing hydrogen sulfide,” Soviet Scientific Reviews, Section B. Chemistry Reviews, OPA Ltd., Amsterdam, 8, 115 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Miyasaka, T. Kanamaru, and H. Ogawa, “Critical stress for stress corrosion cracking of duplex stainless steel in sour environments,” Corrosion, 52, 8, 592–599 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. K. Vagapov, “Corrosion failure of steel equipment and pipelines at the gas field facilities in the presence of aggressive components,” Tekhnologiya Metallov, No. 3, 47–54 (2021); DOI: https://doi.org/10.31044/1684-2499-2021-0-3-47-54.

  11. A. G. Filippov, A. K. Tokman, A. G. Potapov, et al., Operation of Wells of the Astrakhan’ Gas Condensate Field [in Russian], Gazprom Expo LLC, Moscow (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. N. Mokshaev, N. I. Sorokin, and S. N. Baryshev, “Providing reliability and operating efficiency of the equipment at the hazardous production facilities of the Orenburg NGKM beyond design lifetime,” Gazovaya Promyshlennost’, No. 3 (765), 39–41 (2018).

  13. D. Zapevalov and R. Vagapov, “Aspects of protection against carbon dioxide corrosion of gas production facilities,” E3S Web of Conf., 121, 02013 (2019); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912102013.

  14. I. L. Rozenfeld and K. A. Zhigalova, Accelerated Methods of Corrosion Testing of Metals (Theory and Practice) [in Russian], Me–tallurgiya, Moscow (1966).

  15. GOST 9.908–85, Unified System of Corrosion and Aging Protection. METALS and Alloys. METHODS for Determination of Corrosion and Corrosion Resistance Indices [in Russian].

  16. O. G. Mikhalkina, “The use of X-ray diffraction method for studying cores and man-made products,” Nauchno-Tekhn. Sb. “Vesti Gazovoi Nauki,” No. 4 (28), 96–107 (2016).

  17. Ye. S. Ivanov, M. L. Brodskii, Yu. V. Ryabov, and A. V. Timonin, “Study of the corrosion resistance and susceptibility to corrosion-mechanical failure of a new pipe steel 08KhMFChA in hydrogen sulfide-containing oil field media,” Praktika Protivokorrozionnoi Zashchity, No. 3 (53), 8–19 (2009).

  18. W. Sun, S. Nešić, and S. Papavinasam, “Kinetics of corrosion layer formation, P. 2, Iron sulfide and mixed iron sulfide/carbonate layers in carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulfide corrosion,” Corrosion, No. 7, 586–599 (2008).

  19. R. K. Vagapov, D. N. Zapevalov, and K. A. Ibatullin, “Evaluation of the corrosion resistance of materials under the moisture condensation conditions and presence of carbon dioxide,” Voprosy Materialovedeniya, No. 1 (101), 163–175 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.22349/1994-6716-2020-101-1-163-175.

  20. S. L. Asher et al., “Top of the line corrosion prediction in wet gas pipelines,” NACE Conf. CORROSION 2012, paper С-2012-0001303 (2012).

  21. D. V. Pugh, S. L. Asher, J. Cai, et al., “Top-of-line corrosion mechanism for sour wet gas pipelines,” NACE Conf. CORROSION 2009, paper 09285 (2009).

  22. C. Zhou, B. Fang, J. Wang, et al., “Effect of interaction between corrosion film and H2S/CO2 partial pressure ratio on the hydrogen permeation in X80 pipeline steel,” Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 55, 5, 392–399 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422X.2020.1737384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. R. F. Mambetov, V. M. Kushnarenko, F. Sh. Hafizov, and I. F. Hafizov, “Causes of through-the-thickness damage of the pipeline weld,” Nauka i Tekhnologii Truboprovodnogo Transporta Nefti i Nefteproduktov, 10, 1, 42–51 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.28999/2541-9595-2020-10-1-42-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. GOST 1579–93, Wire. Bend Test Method [in Russian].

  25. R. K. Vagapov, Yu. I. Kuznetsov, and L. V. Frolova, “The possibilities of using volatile inhibitors to protect steel against hydrogen sulfide corrosion in the oil and gas industry,” Gazovaya Promyshlennost’, No. 4 (630), 68–72 (2009).

  26. Ye. S. Ivanov, A. S. Guzenkova, and S. S. Ivanov, “Hydrogenation of pipe steel during operation,” Tekhnologiya Metallov, No. 1, 46–48 (2016).

  27. L. Ye. Tsygankova, V. A. Fedorov, O. A. Fomenkov, T. N. Pluzhnikova, M. N. Yesina, and Ye. Yu. Kopylova, “Inhibition of steel corrosion and hydrogen diffusion into metal in hydrogen sulfide-hydrocarbon media,” Praktika Protivokorrozionnoi Zashchity, No. 3 (53), 66–71 (2009).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. R. Kantyukov.

Additional information

Translated from Metallurg, Vol. 65, No. 12, pp. 24–31, December, 2021. Russian DOI: https://doi.org/10.52351/00260827_2021_12_24.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kantyukov, R.R., Zapevalov, D.N. & Vagapov, R.K. Assessment of the Effect of Operating Conditions on the Resistance of Steels Used in H2S-Containing Environments at Hydrocarbon Production Facilities. Metallurgist 65, 1369–1380 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-022-01284-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-022-01284-4

Keywords

Navigation