Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Damage tolerance and classic fatigue life prediction of a helicopter main rotor blade

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fatigue life of the main rotor blade of a helicopter is investigated from two different approaches. The blade is comprised of many different parts such as spar, skin, abrasive strip, doublers, box beam doublers, etc. and it undergoes complex random load spectra. A finite element analysis is carried out to assess the stress distribution in the blade parts. Then, using the Miner’s rule the fatigue life of the blade is calculated following a classic life estimation method under random loading. At the next step, damage tolerance approach is used for life estimation of the blade. Fatigue crack growth properties and threshold stress intensity range of the spar is obtained based on ASTM E647 test method. Then, crack growth analysis is done using Zencrack software. In order to calculate the length of the smallest growing cracks and their fatigue crack growth life, no crack growth and slow crack growth approaches are used. A comprehensive investigation is carried out on the effect of initial crack length and aspect ratio on growth or no growth of cracks. Comparing the obtained fatigue life from two different approaches, some conclusive results are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marquet T, Struzik A (1999) Damage tolerance applied on metallic components. Presented at the RTO AVT specialists’ meeting on “application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft”, published in RTO MP-24, held in Corfu, Greece, 21–22 April

  2. Davies DP, Jenkins SL, Belben FR (2013) Survey of fatigue failures in helicopter components and some lessons learnt. Eng Fail Anal 32:134–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amura M, Aiello L, Colavita M, Paolis FD, Manuele B (2014) Failure of a helicopter main rotor blade. In: 20th European conference on fracture (ECF20), Procedia Materials Science, vol 3, pp 726–731

  4. Wanhill RJH, Symonds N, Merati A, Pasang T, Lynch SP (2013) Five helicopter accidents with evidence of material and/or design deficiencies. Eng Fail Anal 35:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall AD (1978) Helicopter fatigue evaluation. Helicopter fatigue: a review of current requirements and substantiation procedures. AGARD report No 674, 13–20 Sept

  6. Guigan MJ Mc (1980) Helicopter component fatigue life determination. AGARD conference proceedings No 297, September 9-1 to 9-10

  7. Lazzeri L, Mariani U (2009) Application of damage tolerance principles to the design of helicopters. Int J Fatigue 31:1039–1045

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. FAA Airworthiness Regulations (1989) Part 29, transport category helicopters, section 29.571, fatigue evaluation of structure, Federal Aviation Administration, US department of transport

  9. Everett RA Jr (1990) A comparison of fatigue life prediction methodologies for rotorcraft. NASA technical memorandum TM 102759

  10. Miner MA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 12(1):A159–A164

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krasnowsk BR (1999) Application of damage tolerance to increase safety of helicopters in service. Dept. 81, MS. 1342, Bell helicopter Textron, Inc. BHTl

  12. Och F (1979) Fatigue life estimation methods for helicopter structural parts. AGARD report No. 674, pp 21–27

  13. Wolfe RA, Arden RW (1979) U.S. army helicopter fatigue requirements and substantiation procedures. AGARD report No. 674, pp 1–12

  14. Alli P (1979) Present fatigue analysis and design of helicopter requirements and qualification procedures. AGARD report No. 674, pp 29–46

  15. Baraniecki R, Kaniewska M (2011) Fatigue life estimation of structural element of MI-24 helicopter. J Kones Powertrain Transp 18(2):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  16. Everett RA, Elbert JW (1999) Damage tolerance issues as related to metallic rotorcraft dynamic components. Presented at the NATO/RTO spring symposium on aging systems: application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft, Corfu, Greece

  17. Marquet T, Struzik A (1998) Damage tolerance applied to metallic components. In: 24th European rotorcraft forum. Marseille

  18. Edwards PR, Darts J (1984) Standardized fatigue loading sequences for helicopter rotors (HELIX and FELIX). Part 1: background and fatigue evaluation. Royal aircraft establishment, technical report 84085

  19. A standardised fatigue loading sequence for helicopter main rotorhead structures (Rotorix). Damage Tolerance Group Report CU/927/N/27, Cranfield University, Department of Trade and Industry Link Contract No. RA/6/30/06, (1996)

  20. A standardised fatigue loading sequence for helicopter airframe structures (Asterix). Research Paper RP980, GKN Westland Helicopters, Department of Trade and Industry Link Contract No. RA/6/30/06

  21. Harrison LDD, Charles C, Kanninen MF (2002) Implementation of damage tolerance concepts for metallic rotorcraft structures and drive train components. Federal Aviation Administration

  22. Crawford CC, Carlson RL, Bates PR (1991) Damage tolerance analysis for rotorcraft: what the issues are. In: 17th European Rotorcraft Forum, Berlin, Germany, 24–26 Sept

  23. Chan SLH, Tiong UH, Bil C, Clark G (2010) Some factors influencing damage tolerance under helicopter spectra. Proc Eng 2:1497–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Everett Jr RA (1999) Technical evaluation report on 1999 Specialists’ Meeting on application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft. Paper presented at the RTO AVT specialists’ meeting on “application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft”, published in RTO MP-24 and held in Corfu, Greece, pp 21–22

  25. Forth, SC, Everett RA, Newman JA (2002) A novel approach to rotorcraft damage tolerance. In: 6th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Aging Aircraft Conference—16–19 Sept

  26. Lincoln JW, Yeh HC (1999) Treatment of high-cycle vibratory stress in rotorcraft damage tolerance design. Presented at the RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting

  27. Everett Jr RA, Elber W (1999) The significance of small cracks in fatigue design concepts as related to rotorcraft metallic dynamic components presented at the RTO AVT specialists’ meeting on “application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft”, published in RTO MP-24, held in Corfu, Greece, 21–22 April

  28. Shaniavski AA (2004) Scale levels for fatigue fracture mechanisms of in-service crack growth in longerons of helicopter rotor blades. Int J Fract 128:17–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook R, Wood PC, Jenkins S, Matthew D, Irving P, Austen I, Buller R (1999) The development of a robust crack growth model for rotorcraft metallic structure. Presented at the RTO AVT specialists’ meeting on “application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft”, published in RTO MP-24, held in Corfu, Greece, 21–22 April

  30. Forth S., Le D, Turnberg J (2005) An evaluation of the applicability of damage tolerance to dynamic systems. Submitted to the 8th Joint NASA/FAA/DOD aging aircraft conference, Palm Springs, California, USA, 31 Jan–3 Feb

  31. Citarella R, Apicella A (2006) Advanced design concepts and maintenance by integrated risk evaluation for aerostructures. Struct Durab Health Monit 2(3):183–196

    Google Scholar 

  32. Giglio M, Beretta S, Mariani U, Ratti G (2010) Defect tolerance assessment of a helicopter component subjected to multiaxial load. Eng Fract Mech 77:2479–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mariani U, Vicario M (2004) Application of flaw tolerance methodologies to rotorcraft fatigue qualification. Agusta Westland a finmeccanica company cascina costa di camarate, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  34. Adams DO (2000) Flaw tolerant safe-life methodology. MS S346A4, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 6900 Main Street, P.O. Box 9729, Stratford, CT 06497.9129, USA

  35. Matthew D (1999) Application of damage tolerance to the EH101 airframe. Presented at the RTO AVT specialists’ meeting on “application of damage tolerance principles for improved airworthiness of rotorcraft”, published in RTO MP-24, held in Corfu, Greece, 21–22 April

  36. US army material command (1974) Engineering design handbook, Helicopter engineering, part one: preliminary design (Helicopter engineering AMCP 706-201, preliminary design). August

  37. Fatemi A, Plaseied A, Khosrovaneh AK, Tanner D (2005) Application of bi-linear log–log S–N model to strain-controlled fatigue data of aluminum alloys and its effect on life predictions. Int J Fatigue 27:1040–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stephens RI, Fatemi A, Stephens RR, Fuchs HO (2001) Metal fatigue in engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. User manual for Zencrack 7.5, Zentech International Ltd

  40. Citarella R, Lepore M, Maligno A, Shlyannikov V (2015) FEM simulation of a crack propagation in a round bar under combined tension and torsion fatigue loading. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 31:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  41. Maligno AR, Citarella R, Silberschmidt VV, Soutis C (2015) Assessment of structural integrity of subsea wellhead system: analytical and numerical study. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 31:97–119

    Google Scholar 

  42. ASTM E647-13ae1 (2013) Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. Annual Book of ASTM standards, vol 03.01, American Society for Testing and Materials

  43. Farahmand B (2006).Analytical method of generating da/dN curves for aerospace alloys. In: Proceedings of the 16th European conference of fracture, Alexandroupolis, Greece, 3–7 July

  44. Hillberry BM, Alzos WX, Skat ACJ (1975) The fatigue crack propagation delay behavior in 2024-T3 aluminum alloy due to single overload/underload sequence. School of mechanical engineering Purdue university, west lafayette, Indiana

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Pardis Street, Mollasadra Avenue, Vanak Square, P.O. Box 19395-1999, Tehran, Iran

    A. R. Shahani & S. Mohammadi

Authors
  1. A. R. Shahani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mohammadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahani, A.R., Mohammadi, S. Damage tolerance and classic fatigue life prediction of a helicopter main rotor blade. Meccanica 51, 1869–1886 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0339-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0339-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation