Skip to main content
Log in

A method of determining test load for full-scale wind turbine blade fatigue tests

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Full-scale fatigue test is an effective method for validating the fatigue performance of wind turbine blade. Its primary problem is how to design the test load. The conventional approach to determine test load requires a complicated and time-consuming process. Thus, a simplified method for directly converting load spectrum of blade into test load is proposed in this paper. Firstly, beam theory is used to obtain the relationship between stress, strain and bending moment of blade cross section. Based on the assumption of local stress concentration and linear relationship between stress and strain, M-N curves (applied moment vs. allowable number of cycles to failure) is defined. Secondly, based on Miner's linear cumulative damage theory and constant life diagram, the equivalent fatigue cumulative damage of load spectrum which is equal to the damage of full-scale fatigue test is obtained. Then, in the case of the selected test load ratio and cycles, the mean and amplitude of test load can be solved. Finally, the validity of the proposed method is verified by an illustrative example. The result indicates that the error of the calculated results between this method and the traditional method is close to 5 %, and it can be used for fatigue test and improve the efficiency of test load design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caithness Windfarm Information Forum, Summary of wind turbine accident data to 31 March 2017, Available at: http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk.

  2. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61400–1 Wind turbines part 1: Design requirements (2005).

  3. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61400–23 Wind turbines Part 23: Full–scale structural testing of rotor blades (2014).

  4. X. Guo, X. Fu, H. Shang and J. Chen, Integrated aerostructural optimization design of pre–bend wind turbine blades, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30 (11) (2016) 5103–5113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Malhotra, R. W. Hyers, J. F. Manwell and J. G. McGowan, A review and design study of blade testing systems for utility–scale wind turbines, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2012) 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. F. Zhou, H. Y. Dou, L. Z. Qin, Y. Chen, Y. Q. Ni and J. M. Ko, A review of full–scale structural testing of wind turbine blades, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33 (2014) 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Brøndsted and R. P. Nijssen, Advances in wind turbine blade design and materials, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK (2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Freebury and W. Musial, Determining equivalent damage loading for full–scale wind turbine blade fatigue tests, Proceedings of the 19th American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, Nevada, USA (2000) 50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Larwood and W. Musial, Comprehensive testing of Nedwind 12–Meter wind turbine blades at NREL, Proceedings of the 19th American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, Nevada, USA (2000) 51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. P. L. Nijssen, Fatigue life prediction and strength degradation of wind turbine rotor blade composites, Contractor Report SAND2006–7810P, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. H. Huh, J. H. Lee, D. J. Kim and Y. S. Lee, Effect of stress ratio on fatigue life of GFRP composites for WT blade, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26 (7) (2012) 2117–2120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. R. Greaves, Fatigue analysis and testing of wind turbine blades, Doctoral Dissertation, Durham University (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Dai, W. Hu and X. B. Shen, Load and dynamic characteristic analysis of wind turbine flexible blades, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (4) (2017) 1569–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O. A. Bauchau and J. I. Craig, Structural analysis: With applications to aerospace structures. Springer, New York, USA (2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Germanischer Lloyd, Guideline for the certification of wind turbines (2010).

  16. S. Larwood, W. Musial, G. Freebury and A. G. Beattie, NedWind 25 blade testing at NREL for the European standards measurement and testing program, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, Colorado, USA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zong-Wen An.

Additional information

This paper was presented at ICMR 2017 & QR2MSE 2017, Crowne Plaza Chengdu West, Chengdu, China, October 24–27, 2017. Recommended by Guest Editor Dong Ho Bae.

Qiang Ma is currently a Ph.D. candidate in School of Mechanical and Electronical Engineering at Lanzhou University of Technology of China. His research interests include fatigue life prediction and fatigue testing of wind turbine blade.

Zong-Wen An is a Professor of School of Mechanical and Electronical Engineering at Lanzhou University of Technology of China. He received the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in 2009. He is a senior member of Chinese mechanical engineering society. His research interests include structural reliability analysis, mechanical design theory and methodology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Q., An, ZW., Gao, JX. et al. A method of determining test load for full-scale wind turbine blade fatigue tests. J Mech Sci Technol 32, 5097–5104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1006-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1006-y

Keywords

Navigation