Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical exercise protocols in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Metabolic Brain Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several animal studies have showed the beneficial effects of physical exercise (PE) on brain function and health. Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, characterized by the presence of aggregated extracellular amyloid-beta (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles, with progressive cognitive decline. Therapeutic approaches such as PE showed to be effective in halting AD progression. Here, we present a systematic review about PE and AD. The search was carried out using the PubMed and LILACS databases. The following keywords were used: Alzheimer; PE; animal model. All found studies adopted aerobic exercise training as the PE protocol (100%). We identified running on treadmill as the most commonly used PE routine (62.5%). The duration of each session, intensity, frequency, and period of training most used were 60 min/day (62.5%), moderate intensity (87.5%), 5 days/week (62.5%), and 4 (37.5%) or 12 (37.5%) weeks, respectively. The AD animal models most used were the Tg APP/PS1ΔE9 (25%), models based on i.c.v. infusion of AβOs (25%) and streptozotocin (25%). All protocols used rodents to their experiments (100%), but mice were the most common (62.5%). Finally, the main results presented in all studies were capable to reduce significantly AD consequences, such as reducing Aβ or pro-inflammatory proteins levels (100%). The lack of resistance training protocols in animal models of AD indicates a huge gap that should be investigated in future studies. We suggest that PE protocols must be adapted according to the specie, lineage and life span of the animal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Coordenação de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG).

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RAL, CMR and BFM review and wrote the manuscript; RALS, CMR and BFM performed the literature research; RALS, CMR, BFM, ACIC, MFDP and RCC analyzed and critically discussed the data and reviewed the manuscript; RALS, CMR, BFM, ACIC, MFDP, RCC supervised the review. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Augusto Leoni De Sousa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Sousa, R.A.L., Rodrigues, C.M., Mendes, B.F. et al. Physical exercise protocols in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Metab Brain Dis 36, 85–95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-020-00633-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-020-00633-z

Keywords

Navigation