Abstract
Geological heterogeneities directly control underground flow. In channelized sedimentary environments, their determination is often underconstrained: it may be possible to observe the most recent channel path and the abandoned meanders on seismic or satellite images, but smaller-scale structures are generally below image resolution. In this paper, reconstruction of channelized systems is proposed with a stochastic inverse simulation reproducing the reverse migration of the system. Maps of the recent trajectories of the Mississippi river were studied to define appropriate relationships between simulation parameters. Measurements of curvature and migration vectors showed (i) no significant correlation between curvature and migration offset and (ii) correlation trends of downstream and lateral migration offsets versus the curvature at half-meander scale. The proposed reverse migration method uses these trends to build possible paleo-trajectories of the river starting from the last stage of the sequence observed from present-day (satellite or seismic) data. As abandoned meanders provide clues about the paleo-locations of the river, they are integrated time step by time step during the reverse simulation process. We applied the method to a satellite image of a fluvial system. Each of the different resulting geometries of the system honored most of the available observations and presented meandering patterns similar to the observed ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu V, Sullivan M, Pirmez C, Mohrig D (2003) Lateral accretion packages (LAPs): an important reservoir element in deep water sinuous channels. Mar Pet Geol 20(6–8):631–648. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.08.003
Armitage DA, McHargue T, Fildani A, Graham SA (2012) Postavulsion channel evolution: Niger Delta continental slope. AAPG Bull 96(5):823–843. doi:10.1306/09131110189
Bézier PE (1983) Unisurf, from styling to tool-shop. Comput Ind 4(2):115–126. doi:10.1016/0166-3615(83)90017-9
Botella A, Lévy B, Caumon G (2016) Indirect unstructured hex-dominant mesh generation using tetrahedra recombination. Comput Geosci 20(3):437–451. doi:10.1007/s10596-015-9484-9
Brice JC (1974) Evolution of meander loops. Geol Soc Am Bull 85(4):581–586. doi:10.1130/0016-7606
Camporeale C, Perona P, Porporato A, Ridolfi L (2007) Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Rev Geophys 45:1–28. doi:10.1029/2005RG000185.1
Covault JA, Sylvester Z, Hubbard SM, Jobe ZR, SR P (2016) The stratigraphic record of submarine-channel evolution. Sediment Rec 14(3):4–11. doi:10.2110/sedred.2016.3
Deutsch CV, Tran TT (2002) FLUVSIM: a program for object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial depositional systems. Comput Geosci 28:525–535. doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(01)00075-9
Durkin PR, Hubbard SM, Boyd RL, Leckie DA (2015) Stratigraphic expression of intra-point-bar erosion and rotation. J Sediment Res 85(10):1238–1257. doi:10.2110/jsr.2015.78
Edwards BF, Smith DH (2002) River meandering dynamics. Phys Rev E 65(4 Pt 2B):046303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.046303
Fisk HN (1944) Geological investigation of the alluvial valley of the lower Mississippi River. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mississippi River Commission
Fitterman DV, Menges CM, Al Kamali AM, Jama FE (1991) Electromagnetic mapping of buried paleochannels in eastern Abu Dhabi Emirate, UAE. Geoexploration 27(1–2):111–133. doi:10.1016/0016-7142(91)90018-8
Frascati A, Lanzoni S (2009) Morphodynamic regime and longterm evolution of meandering rivers. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. doi:10.1029/2008JF001101
Furbish DJ (1988) River-bend curvature and migration: how are they related? Geology 16(8):752–755. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0752:RBCAMH>2.3.CO;2
García-Gil A, Vázquez-Suñe E, Alcaraz MM, Juan AS, Sánchez-Navarro JÁ, Montlleó M, Rodríguez G, Lao J (2015) GIS-supported mapping of low-temperature geothermal potential taking groundwater flow into account. Renew Energy 77:268–278. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.096
Ghinassi M, Ielpi A, Aldinucci M, Fustic M (2016) Downstream-migrating fluvial point bars in the rock record. Sediment Geol 334:66–96. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.01.005
Hajek EA, Wolinsky MA (2012) Simplified process modeling of river avulsion and alluvial architecture: connecting models and field data. Sediment Geol 257–260:1–30. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.09.005
Hickin EJ, Nanson GC (1975) Lateral migration rates of river bends. J Hydraul Eng 110(11):1557–1567. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
Holbrook J, Autin WJ, Rittenour TM, Marshak S, Goble RJ (2006) Stratigraphic evidence for millennial-scale temporal clustering of earthquakes on a continental-interior fault: Holocene Mississippi River floodplain deposits, New Madrid seismic zone, USA. Tectonophysics 420(3):431–454. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2006.04.002
Hooke J (1984) Changes in river meanders: a review of techniques and results of analyses. Phys Geogr 8(4):473–508. doi:10.1177/030913338400800401
Howard AD, Hemberger AT (1991) Multivariate characterization of meandering. Geomorphology 4:161–186. doi:10.1016/0169-555X(91)90002-R
Ikeda S, Parker G, Sawai K (1981) Bend theory of river meanders. Part 1. Linear development. J Fluid Mech 112:363. doi:10.1017/S0022112081000451
Issautier B, Viseur S, Audigane P, Le Nindre YM (2014) Impacts of fluvial reservoir heterogeneity on connectivity: implications in estimating geological storage capacity for \(\text{ CO }_2\). Int J Greenh Gas Control 20:333–349. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.009
Jackson MD, Muggeridge AH (2000) Effect of discontinuous shales on reservoir performance during horizontal waterflooding. SPE J 5(4):446–455. doi:10.2118/69751-PA
Jobe ZR, Howes NC, Auchter NC (2016) Comparing submarine and fluvial channel kinematics: implications for stratigraphic architecture. Geology 44(11):G38158.1. doi:10.1130/G38158.1
Labourdette R (2008) ’LOSCS’ lateral offset stacked channel simulations: towards geometrical modelling of turbidite elementary channels. Basin Res 20(3):431–444. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00361.x
Labourdette R, Bez M (2010) Element migration in turbidite systems: random or systematic depositional processes? AAPG Bull 94(3):345–368. doi:10.1306/09010909035
Labourdette R, Poncet J, Seguin J, Temple F, Hegre J, Irving A (2006) Three-dimensional modelling of stacked turbidite channels in West Africa: impact on dynamic reservoir simulations. Pet Geosci 12(4):335–345. doi:10.1144/1354-079306-705
Langbein W, Leopold L (1966) River meanders—theory of minimum variance. Physiographic and hydraulic studies of rivers, p 15
Leopold LB, Langbein WB (1966) River meanders. Sci Am 214:60–70. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0666-60
Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1964) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Freeman, San Francisco
Lopez S (2003) Modélisation de réservoirs chenalisés méandriformes: approche génétique et stochastique. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris
Maier KL, Fildani A, McHargue TR, Paull CK, Graham SA, Caress DW (2012) Punctuated deep-water channel migration: high-resolution subsurface data from the Lucia Chica channel system, Offshore California, USA. J Sediment Res 82(1):1–8. doi:10.2110/jsr.2012.10
Massart BYG, Jackson MD, Hampson GJ, Johnson HD (2016) Effective flow properties heterolithic, cross-bedded tidal sandstones: part 1. Surface-based modeling. AAPG Bull 100(05):697–721. doi:10.1306/02011614221
Mayall M, Jones E, Casey M (2006) Turbidite channel reservoirs—key elements in facies prediction and effective development. Mar Pet Geol 23(8):821–841. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2006.08.001
McHargue T, Pyrcz M, Sullivan M, Clark J, Fildani A, Romans B, Covault J, Levy M, Posamentier H, Drinkwater N (2011) Architecture of turbidite channel systems on the continental slope: patterns and predictions. Mar Pet Geol 28(3):728–743. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.07.008
Miall AD (2014) Fluvial depositional systems. Springer, New York
Nakajima T, Peakall J, McCaffrey WD, Paton DA, Thompson PJP (2009) Outer-bank bars: a new intra-channel architectural element within sinuous submarine slope channels. J Sediment Res 79(12):872–886. doi:10.2110/jsr.2009.094
Peakall J, McCaffrey B, Kneller B (2000) A process model for the evolution, morphology, and architecture of sinuous submarine channels. J Sediment Res 70(3):434–448. doi:10.1306/2DC4091C-0E47-11D7-8643000102C1865D
Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book. Springer, London
Posamentier HW, Kolla V (2003) Seismic geomorphology and stratigraphy of depositional elements in deep-water settings. J Sediment Res 73(3):367–388. doi:10.1306/111302730367
Pyrcz M, Boisvert J, Deutsch C (2009) ALLUVSIM: a program for event-based stochastic modeling of fluvial depositional systems. Comput Geosci 35(8):1671–1685. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.012
Pyrcz MJ, Sech RP, Covault JA, Willis BJ, Sylvester Z, Sun T (2015) Stratigraphic rule-based reservoir modeling. Bull Can Pet Geol 63(4):287–303. doi:10.2113/gscpgbull.63.4.287
Rongier G, Collon P, Renard P (2017a) A geostatistical approach to the simulation of stacked channels. Mar Pet Geol. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.01.027
Rongier G, Collon P, Renard P (2017b) Stochastic simulation of channelized sedimentary bodies using a constrained l-system. Comput Geosci. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2017.05.006
Rowland JC, Lepper K, Dietrich WE, Wilson CJ, Sheldon R (2005) Tie channel sedimentation rates, oxbow formation age and channel migration rate from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) analysis of floodplain deposits. Earth Surf Process Landf 30(9):1161–1179. doi:10.1002/esp.1268
Ruiu J, Caumon G, Viseur S (2015) Semiautomatic interpretation of 3D sedimentological structures on geologic images: an object-based approach. Interpretation 3(3):63–74. doi:10.1190/INT-2015-0004.1
Ruiu J, Caumon G, Viseur S (2016) Modeling channel forms and related sedimentary objects using a boundary representation based on non-uniform rational B-splines. Math Geosci 48(3):259–284. doi:10.1007/s11004-015-9629-3
Seminara G (2010) Fluvial sedimentary patterns. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42:43–66. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145612
Slingerland R, Smith ND (2004) River avulsions and their deposits. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 32(1):257–285. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120201
Stouthamer E, Berendsen HJA (2001) Avulsion frequency, avulsion duration, and interavulsion period of Holocene channel belts in the Rhine-Meuse delta, The Netherlands. J Sediment Res 71(4):589–598. doi:10.1306/112100710589
Sun T, Meakin P, Jossang T, Schwarz K (1996) A simulation model for meandering rivers. Water Resour Res 32(9):2937–2954. doi:10.1029/96WR00998
Teles V, de Marsily G, Perrier E (1998) A new approach for modelling sediment deposition in an alluvial plain in order to display its heterogeneity. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sci Ser IIA Earth Planet Sci 327(9):597–606. doi:10.1016/S1251-8050(99)80113-X
Tiller W (1992) Application of Knot-removal algorithms for NURBS curves and surfaces. Comput Aided Des 24(8):445–453. doi:10.1016/0010-4485(92)90012-Y
Veeken PC (2006) Seismic stratigraphy, basin analysis and reservoir characterisation, vol 37. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Viseur S (2004) Caractérisation de réservoirs turbiditiques: simulations stochastiques basées-objet de chenaux méandriformes. Bull de la Soc Géol de Fr 1(75):11–20. doi:10.2113/175.1.11
Willis BJ, Tang H (2010) Three-dimensional connectivity of point-bar deposits. J Sediment Res 80(5):440–454. doi:10.2110/jsr.2010.046
Wynn RB, Cronin BT, Peakall J (2007) Sinuous deep-water channels: genesis, geometry and architecture. Mar Pet Geol 24(6–9):341–387. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.06.001
Acknowledgements
This work was performed in the frame of the RING project at Université de Lorraine (http://ring.georessources.univ-lorraine.fr/). We would like to thank for their support the industrial and academic sponsors of the RING-GOCAD Consortium managed by ASGA. The software corresponding to this paper is available in the GoNURBS plugin of SKUA-Gocad. We also acknowledge Paradigm for the SKUA-Gocad Software and API. The authors thank Michael Pyrcz and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive remarks that helped us to improve this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A Forward Migration Analysis of the Mississippi River
Migration rates have also been studied on the Mississippi river between pairs of paleo-trajectories in the forward direction of the paleo-flow. The lateral and downstream offsets have been computed in the same way as in the reverse direction but with inverted vectors. The results are close to the ones deduced from the reverse direction: no clear global correlation can be observed between curvature and forward migration. Correlation trends can be observed at the half-meander scale. These smooth correlations vary depending on the considered half-meander (Figs. 21, 22).
Appendix B Algorithm of the Reverse Migration Method
The proposed algorithm for channelized system reconstruction requires as input data the number of wanted realizations, the number of targeted reverse steps, the horizontal and vertical distributions of migration offsets, the final channel path centerline, the list of identified oxbow lake centerlines with their corresponding estimated minimal and maximal values of abandonment period. It iterates on the wanted number of stochastic realizations, on the wanted number of the reverse migration time steps and on the number of half-meanders found, to reverse migrate the main channel path while conditioning to paleo-geometries observed. The Algorithm 1 is illustrated in Fig. 7.
Appendix C Flexibility in Interactive Channel Modeling Brought by Non-uniform Rational B-Splines
Non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) are parametric surfaces defined by a network of control points and an interpolation function (Piegl and Tiller 1997). The interpolation function is a continuous polynomial function whose degree is directly related to the number of interpolated points (Bézier 1983). NURBS objects present a curvilinear framework that permits to choose the grid resolution without shape deformation. These surfaces have been combined to define volumetric objects independent from the support (Ruiu et al. 2016). Thus, channels, levees, point bars and lobes can be modeled with NURBS (Fig. 23) allowing us to reproduce channelized systems in both fluvial and turbidite contexts.
In many steps of the workflow, the number of control points varies in an inhomogeneous way. This is the case at each connection of two objects (e.g., the integration of an oxbow lake) or at each local deformation of the NURBS object (e.g., the reverse migration process). This decreases the handling of the NURBS object and the computational efficiency (Fig. 24a). Therefore, the algorithm of Tiller (1992) has been implemented to determine the smallest control polygon while minimizing the deformation imposed to the NURBS (Fig. 24b).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parquer, M.N., Collon, P. & Caumon, G. Reconstruction of Channelized Systems Through a Conditioned Reverse Migration Method. Math Geosci 49, 965–994 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9700-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9700-3