Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal design of composite shells based on minimum weight and maximum feasibility robustness

  • Published:
International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A robust design optimization (RDO) approach for minimum weight and safe shell composite structures with minimal variability into design constraints under uncertainties is proposed. A new concept of feasibility robustness associated to the variability of design constraints is considered. So, the feasibility robustness is defined through the determinant of variance–covariance matrix of constraint functions introducing in this way the joint effects of the uncertainty propagations on structural response. A new framework considering aleatory uncertainty into RDO of composite structures is proposed. So, three classes of variables and parameters are identified: deterministic design variables, random design variables and random parameters. The bi-objective optimization search is performed using on a new approach based on two levels of dominance denoted by Co-Dominance-based Genetic Algorithm (CoDGA). The use of evolutionary concepts together sensitivity analysis based on adjoint variable method is a new proposal. The examples with different sources of uncertainty show that the Pareto front definition depends on random design variables and/or random parameters considered in RDO. Furthermore, the importance to control the uncertainties on the feasibility of constraints is demonstrated. CoDGA approach is a powerfully tool to help designers to make decision establishing the priorities between performance and robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adali, S., Lene, F., Duvaut, G., Chiaruttini, V.: Optimization of laminated composites subject to uncertain buckling loads. Compos. Struct. 62, 261–269 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S.: Curved finite elements in the analysis of solid, shell and plate structures. Ph.D. Thesis, University College of Swansea, UK (1969)

  • António, C.A.C.: Optimization of structures using composite materials made of polymeric matrix (in Portuguese). Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Portugal (1995)

  • António, C.A.C.: A multilevel genetic algorithm for optimization of geometrically non-linear stiffened composite structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 24, 372–386 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • António, C.C., Hoffbauer, L.N.: From local to global importance measures of uncertainty propagation in composite structures. Compos. Struct. 85, 213–225 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • António, C.C.: Self-adaptation procedures in genetic algorithms applied to the ptimal design of composite structures. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 5, 289–302 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • António, C.A.C., Hoffbauer, L.N.: An approach for reliability-based robust design optimization of angle-ply composites. Compos. Struct. 90, 53–59 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • António, C.C., Hoffbauer, L.N.: Uncertainty propagation in inverse reliability-based design of composite structures. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 6, 89–102 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • António, C.A.C.: Local and global Pareto dominance applied to optimal design and material selection of composite structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48, 73–94 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, J.S., Cardoso, J.B.: Variational principle for shape design sensitivity analysis. AIAA J. 30, 538–547 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cacuci, D.G.: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, I. Theory, vol. 1. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton. (2003)

  • Carbillet, S., Richard, F., Boubakar, L.: Reliability indicator for layered composites with strongly non-linear behaviour. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 81–87 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.H., Lee, W.H., Park, J.J., Youn, B.D.: A study on robust design optimization of layered plate bonding process considering uncertainties. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 35, 531–540 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiras, J.A.: Ultimate load analysis of anisotropic and reinforced concrete plates and shells. Ph.D. Thesis, University College of Swansea, UK (1983)

  • Gumbert, C.R., Newman, P.A.: High-fidelity computational optimization for 3-D flexible wings: part II-effect of random geometric uncertainty on design. Optim. Eng. 6, 139–156 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Helton, J.C., Davis, F.J.: Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 1175–1209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Lozano, M., Sánchez, A.M.: A taxonomy for the crossover operator for real-coded genetic algorithms. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18, 309–338 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., Du, X.: Analytical robustness assessment for robust design. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 34, 123–137 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konak, A., Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E.: Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 992–1007 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragavajhala, S., Mahadevan, S.: Design optimization for robustness in multiple performance functions. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 47, 523–538 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rais-Rohani, M., Singh, M.N.: Comparison of global and local response surface techniques in reliability-based optimization of composite structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 26, 333–345 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocquigny, E., Devictor, N., Tarantola, S.: Uncertainty in Industrial Practice: A guide to Quantitative Uncertainty Management. Wiley, Chichester (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, A.D.E., Rocco, S.C.M.: Solving advanced multi-objective robust designs by means of multiple objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA): a reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92, 697–706 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F.: Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model-based inference. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 1109–1125 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, H., Baheranwala, F., Coit, D.W., Wattanapongsakorn, N.: Practical solutions for multi-objective optimization: an application to system reliability design problems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92, 314–322 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, S.W.: Composites Design. Think Composites, Dayton (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M., Hamilton, R.: A technique for optimally designing fibre-reinforced laminated plates with manufacturing uncertainties for maximum buckling strength. Eng. Optim. 37(2), 135–144 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, K., McDonald, M., Mahadevan, S., Green, L.: Robustness-based design optimization under data uncertainty. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 44, 183–197 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, through the funding of LAETA/INEGI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Conceição António.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

António, C.C., Hoffbauer, L.N. Optimal design of composite shells based on minimum weight and maximum feasibility robustness. Int J Mech Mater Des 13, 287–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-015-9329-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-015-9329-7

Keywords

Navigation