Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Who is Being Screened for Intimate Partner Violence in Primary Care Settings? Secondary Data Analysis of a Cluster Randomised Trial

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess sociodemographic differences in postpartum women screened for intimate partner violence and who disclosed to their Maternal and Child Health nurses.

Methods

Secondary analyses of survey data from women participating in a cluster randomised trial. The trial tested a nurse-designed, enhanced violence screening model-versus routine screening among eight community nurse clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Self-completion anonymous surveys were sent to all clinic attendees who had given birth in the previous eight months. We measured intimate partner violence with the Composite Abuse Scale and other sociodemographic variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse characteristics of screened versus unscreened women and those who did or did not disclose.

Results

91 clinics (163 nurses) participated in the trial. 2621/10,472 (25%) women responded to the survey. Notable characteristics, such as level of intimate partner violence (AdjOR 1.14, CI 0.94–1.40), parity (AdjOR 1.13, CI 0.94–1.35), education (AdjOR 1.20 CI 0.91–1.58) and being born in Australia (AdjOR 0.94, CI 0.86–1.03) made no significant difference to screening. However, nurses were significantly less likely to screen women with a lower income than those with a higher one (AdjOR 0.59, CI 0.40–0.87) with a dose response relationship. Women on the lowest levels of income were significantly more likely to disclose abuse (AdjOR 3.06, CI 1.02–9.17), indicating missed opportunities for nurses to provide timely care.

Conclusions for practice

Despite being required to screen all women, nurses are almost twice as likely to screen more affluent women, who would be less likely to be experiencing or disclose intimate partner violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The MOVE trial was funded by the Australian Research Council, the Office for Women, Victorian government and the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. No additional funding was sourced for this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leesa Hooker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The MOVE study was approved by the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development and the La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee (UHEC 08–142).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hooker, L., Taft, A. Who is Being Screened for Intimate Partner Violence in Primary Care Settings? Secondary Data Analysis of a Cluster Randomised Trial. Matern Child Health J 25, 1554–1561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03136-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03136-0

Keywords

Navigation