Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovative learning spaces: class management and universal design for learning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent and important changes in pedagogy design include flexible learning methods that address student diversity (universal design for learning–UDL) and innovative learning spaces. The goals of this study were (1) to compare pedagogical practices in traditional and innovative learning environments in the context of the management dimension of classroom climate; (2) to measure the correlation between teacher-centered and student-centered learning and number of classroom discipline events; and (3) to measure the effect of select UDL principles and innovative learning spaces on the relationship between the rate of expression of teacher-centered learning and number of classroom discipline events. A total of 507 observations were carried out to document classroom pedagogical and discipline management, 265 (52%) in traditional classrooms and 242 (48%) in the innovative learning spaces of four elementary schools in the same geographical region. The rate of student-centered learning and pedagogical practices that express UDL principles was significantly higher in innovative spaces than in traditional classes. A moderate, positive and significant correlation was found between teacher-centered learning and number of classroom discipline events. In addition, the learning space, integration of tasks that encourage choice, and integration of tasks that address learners’ differences were found as significant moderating variables of the relationship between teacher-centered learning and the number of classroom discipline events. The study provides an in-depth understanding of the relationships that exist between the applications of several pedagogical practices and discipline that are important for development of similar innovative learning space initiatives regionally and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alansari, M., & Rubie-Davies, C. (2020). What about the tertiary climate? Reflecting on five decades of class climate research. Learning Environments Research, 23(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09288-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley.

  • Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (2009). The social psychology of the classroom. Routledge.

  • Bishara, S. (2018). Active and traditional teaching, self-image, and motivation in learning math among pupils with learning disabilities. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. D., Weinberg, L. A., & Brodwin, M. G. (2014). Universal design for instruction and learning: A pilot study of faculty instructional methods and attitudes related to students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptionality Education International, 24, 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonne, L. (2016). New Zealand students’ mathematics-related beliefs and attitudes: Recent evidence. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. B., Howerter, C. S., & Morgan, J. J. (2013). Tools and strategies for making co-teaching work. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(2), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAST: Center for Applied Special Technology. (2017). What is universal design for learning. Retrieved 12/4/2020 from http://cast.org/udl/index.html.

  • Clunies-Ross, R. P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behavior. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, C. A., Dell, T. F., & Blackwell, T. L. (2015). Applying universal design for learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations. The Journal of Educators Online, 13, 166–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLalla, L. F., & Mullineaux, P. Y. (2008). The effect of classroom environment on problem behaviors: A twin study. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djigic, G., & Stojiljkovic, S. (2012). Protocol for classroom management styles assessment designing. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J., & Berry, L. (2019). Considering the environment: An expanded framework for teacher knowledge. Journal of Learning Spaces, 8(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I. M., Harvey, S. T., Buckley, L., & Yan, E. (2009). Differentiating classroom climate concepts: Academic, management and emotional environments. Kōtuitui New Zealand J Soc Sci Online, 4(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C. M., & Harris, A. H. (1992). What we know about managing classrooms. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evmenova, A. (2018). Preparing teachers to use universal design for learning to support diverse learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2), 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, H., & Harrington, I. (2019). A review into effective classroom management and strategies for student engagement: Teacher and student roles in today’s classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(12), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1989). Twenty years of classroom climate work: Progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 527–564). MacMillan.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 1, 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). World Scientific.

  • Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A. (2008). Emotion cycles: On the influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. (2018). Space as a tool for analysis: Examining digital learning spaces. Open Praxis, 10(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hod, Y. (2017). Future learning spaces in schools: Concepts and designs from the learning sciences. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imms, W., & Byers, L. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Research, 20(1), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. J., Thomas, C. N., Meyer, J. P., & Alves, K. D. (2014). Using evidence-based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King-Sears, M. E., Johnson, T., Berkeley, S., Weiss, M., Peters-Burton, E., Evmenova, A., & Hursh, J. (2015). An exploratory study of universal design for teaching chemistry to students with and without disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 38, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1993). Choices for children: Why and how to let students decide. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, J., & Oliveira, C. (2017). Classroom discipline: Theory and practice. In J. P. Bakken (Ed.), Classrooms: Academic content and behavior strategy instruction for students with and without disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 231–253). Nova Science Publishers.

  • Marsh, H., & O’Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. & Baldwin, B. (1993). Validation of an inventory of classroom management style: Differences between novice and experienced teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • McDonald, T. (2013). Classroom management: Engaging students in learning. Oxford University Press.

  • McGuire, J. M., & Scott, S. S. (2006). Universal design for instruction: Extending the universal design paradigm to college instruction. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D., & McInerney, V. (2002). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

  • Moos, R. H. (1973). Conceptualizations of human environments. American Psychologist, 28, 652–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. Jossey-Bass.

  • Nagowah, L., & Nagowah, S. (2009). A reflection on the dominant learning theories: Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. The International Journal of Learning, 16(2), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Space as change agent. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 1.1–1.4). Washington, DC: Educause.

  • Pratt, S. (2014). Achieving symbiosis: Working through challenges found in co-teaching to achieve effective co-teaching relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, A. (2006). Managerial culture, workplace culture and situated curricula in organizational learning. Organization Studies, 27(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. E., & Wizer, D. R. (2016). Universal design for learning and the quality matters guidelines for the design and implementation of online learning events. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 12, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E., & Galloway, D. (2002). Classroom influences on bullying. Educational Research, 44, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M., & Rosenfeld, S. (2006). Understanding teacher responses to constructivist learning environments: Challenges and resolutions. Science Education, 90, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., Miedijensky, S., & Malkinson, N. (2021). Designing new learning environments: An innovative pedagogical perspective. The Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidelinger, R., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Education, 59, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel-Hai College and Shamir Research Institute, University of Haifa, Upper Galilee, Israel

    Irit Sasson & Itamar Yehuda

  2. Oranim College and Shamir Research Institute, University of Haifa, Tiv’on, Israel

    Shirley Miedijensky

Authors
  1. Irit Sasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Itamar Yehuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shirley Miedijensky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irit Sasson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasson, I., Yehuda, I. & Miedijensky, S. Innovative learning spaces: class management and universal design for learning. Learning Environ Res 25, 725–739 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09393-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09393-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation