Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The goals of science museums in the eyes of museum pedagogical staff

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, science is a major part of Western culture. One advantage of informal learning environments is that they are (potentially) open to a wide range of populations with varying levels of interest and knowledge. Because of their informal nature, documenting learning has proven challenging. Studies that assess learning in museums, therefore, must employ theories of learning that encompass a more complex view of what learning is. This qualitative study was conducted with a population of high-level pedagogical staff from museums in Israel, Europe and the USA. Its purpose was to characterise staff perception of the goals of science museums and how these goals are manifested in the exhibits. Interviews with 17 staff revealed a wide range of goals that come into play in the different science museums. Findings suggest that the pedagogical staff perceive the science museum’s goals as being to change public views regarding science, promote science education, and reduce disparities between populations. According to museum staff, science museums have an important role in changing visitors’ approach towards science, as well as providing an additional source of science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88, 17–33. doi:10.1002/sce.20016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. B., & Crowely, K. J. (2014). Challenging beliefs, practices, and content: How museum educators change. Science Education, 98, 84–105. doi:10.1002/sce.21093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27, 485–495. doi:10.1007/BF02461476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., & Ginns, I. S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 177–199. doi:10.1002/tea.10071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 138–162. doi:10.1002/tea.10069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. (2004). How families use questions at dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47, 84–100. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00367.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. B., Crain, R., Brandt, C., Loomis, M., Wheaton, M., & Bennett, C. (2007). Talk, tools, and tensions: Observing biological talk over time. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1581–1602. doi:10.1080/09500690701494118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). Multiple outcomes of class visits to natural history museums: The students’ view. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(3), 274–284. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9097-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2009). The learning environment of natural history museums: Multiple ways to capture students’ views. Learning Environments Research, 12, 115–129. doi:10.1007/s10984-009-9057-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermayeff, J. C., Losos, C. M., & Blandford, R. J. (2001). Working at play: Informal science education on museum playgrounds. New York: American Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, E. (2009). Enhancing visitors’ interest in science—A possibility or a paradox? Research in Science Education, 39, 197–213. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9080-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, E., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Staff members’ ideas about visitors’ learning at science and technology centres. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 129–146. doi:10.1080/09500690701649588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, E. (2012). Non-participation in public engagement with science: A study of four socio-economically disadvantaged, minority ethnic groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, King’s College London.

  • Devers, K. J., & Frankel, R. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research–2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice, 13(2), 263–271. doi:10.1080/13576280050074543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.608197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H. (2006). An identity-centered approach to understanding museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49, 151–166. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00209.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89, 744–778. doi:10.1002/sce.20078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., Randol, S., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Mapping the informal science education landscape: An exploratory study. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 865–874. doi:10.1177/0963662510393606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, N. W., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science for what public? Addressing equity in American science museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 368–394. doi:10.1002/tea.21130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. J. (2010). The evolution of the science museum. Physics Today, 63(10), 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graburn, N. (October 01, 1977). The museum and the visitor experience. Roundtable Reports, 1–5.

  • Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88, S59–S70. doi:10.1002/sce.20018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimberg, B. I., & Gummer, E. (2013). Teaching science from cultural points of intersection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 12–32. doi:10.1002/tea.21066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112. doi:10.1080/03057269608560085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. A. (2011). Informal learning: Student achievement and motivation in science through museum-based learning. Learning Environments Research, 14(3), 263–277. doi:10.1007/s10984-011-9094-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, A., & Davidsson, E. (2012). Using sociocultural frameworks to understand the significance of interactions at science and technology centers and museums. In E. Davidsson & A. Jakobsson (Eds.), Understanding interactions at science centers and museums (pp. 3–21). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils’ image of ‘the scientist’ among two communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal of science education, 31(18), 2485–2509. doi:10.1080/09500690802449375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2006). Technoscience and everyday life: The complex simplicities of the mundane. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. F. (2010). Designing immersion exhibits as border-crossing environments. Museum Management & Curatorship, 25(3), 323–336. doi:10.1080/09647775.2010.498990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. F. (2011). Analysis of the educational potential of a science museum learning environment: Visitors’ experience with and understanding of an immersion exhibit. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 517–545. doi:10.1080/09500691003754589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. F., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students’ exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1389–1414. doi:10.1002/tea.20206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2009). In P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse and M. A. Feder (Eds.), Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12190.html.

  • National Research Council, Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12614.

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2007). Research on learning in informal contexts: Advancing the field? International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1441–1445. doi:10.1080/09500690701491122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Ash, D. (2000). Reciprocal theory building inside and outside museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 43, 199–210. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2000.tb01715.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, J. (2004). Multiple modes of meaning-making in a science center. Science Education, 88, 223–247. doi:10.1002/sce.10117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88, 4–16. doi:10.1002/sce.20017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. Journal of Research in Teaching, 40, 112–120. doi:10.1002/tea.10067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260903562284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, R. T. (2001). Incorporating field trips as science learning environment enrichment—An interpretive study. Learning Environments Research, 4(1), 25–49. doi:10.1023/A:1011454625413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2007). School visits to natural history museums: Teaching or enriching? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 747–769. doi:10.1002/tea.20184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, R., Bamberger, Y., & Morag, O. (2005). Guided school visits to natural history museums in Israel: Teachers’ roles. Science Education, 89, 920–935. doi:10.1002/sce.20070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, B. (2012). A cross-cultural exploration of children’s everyday ideas: Implications for science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 609–627. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.579193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. M. (2002). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94, 478–505. doi:10.1002/sce.20374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neta Shaby.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Description of main category: Making science accessible
Table 5 Exhibits that the staff selected during the tour

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaby, N., Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O. & Tishler, C.E. The goals of science museums in the eyes of museum pedagogical staff. Learning Environ Res 19, 359–382 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9211-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9211-z

Keywords

Navigation