Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

My Attitudes Toward Science (MATS): the development of a multidimensional instrument measuring students’ science attitudes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of students in the United States choosing science, technology, engineering or mathematics careers is declining at a time when demand for these occupations is rapidly increasing. Numerous efforts have been undertaken to reverse this trend, yet results are uncertain. One’s attitude is key to many choices one makes, and this includes, for many, what career is pursued. Hence, teachers, informal science educators and researchers often wish to measure children’s attitudes towards science using a pretest and a posttest to determine the effects of a curriculum, an activity or an intervention. However, measuring children’s attitudes toward science has been problematic because of both the limited use of basic psychometrics in checking reliability and validity of instruments and the lack of a single construct of students’ attitudes towards science being surveyed. This article reports the development and testing of an instrument for measuring students’ science attitudes across several dimensions. Thirty-two scientists and teachers from the northeastern and south central United States participated in content validity trials. The instrument was field tested with 549 children (92 elementary-school students, 327 middle-school students and 130 high-school students) from 6 rural and suburban school systems located in the northeastern United States to determine inter-item reliability for each dimension. The resulting instrument, entitled My Attitudes Toward Science (MATS), has 40 items that measure four dimensions: (1) Attitude towards the subject of science; (2) Desire to become a scientist; (3) Value of science to society; and (4) Perception of scientists. The MATS, as a multidimensional instrument, can measure several facets of students’ attitude toward science and is designed to be used across grades levels and to be scored easily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, C. M. (2006). Higher education: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics trends and the role of federal programs. Washington DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office (Education Resources Information Center Document ED 491614).

  • Barman, C. R. (1999). Students’ views about scientists and school science: Engaging K–8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C., & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 961–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C. I. (1984). Elementary statistical procedures. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finson, K. D. (2003). Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-A-Scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finson, K. D., Thomas, J., & Pedersen, J. (2006). Comparing science teaching styles to students’ perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 106(1), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Y. Y. H. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students’ images of scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1999). Applying educational research: A practical guide. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, D. C., Guedes, J., Fonseca, A. M., Pinto, F. C., Martin, I., Byrne, G. J., & Pachana, N. A. (2011). Attitudes, knowledge, and interest: Preparing university students to work in an aging world. International Psychogeriatrics, 23(2), 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D. (2011). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: Changes in career choices and attitude. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Chen, T. W., & De Miranda, M. A. (2014). Connecting the STEM dots: Measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, S. J., Bloodsworth, K. H., Tilburg, C. E., Zeeman, S. I., & List, H. E. (2014). K–12 students’ perception of scientists: Finding a valid measurement and exploring whether exposure to scientists makes an impact. International Journal of Science Education,. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.908264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, C. (2012). The tech sector is buoyant, exports are strong, there is a skills shortage, so where are our young scientists? Irish Times, January 27.

  • Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and using tests effectively: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils’ image of ‘the scientist’ among two communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2485–2509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Sage Research Methods). Retrieved April, 2014 from http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n193.xm

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learner’s conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments? Science & Education, 7, 595–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “Draw A Scientist Tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. K. (1949). Televising science. Physics Today, 2(1), 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monhardt, R. M. (2003). The image of the scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(3), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. W., & Foy, R. L. H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. W., & Sutman, F. X. (1970). The development, field test and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H. (1983). Thirty studies involving the “Scientific Attitude Inventory”: What confidence can we have in this instrument? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, A. J. (2011). The next great resource: Time. http://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,2074024,00.html#

  • Rubin, E., Bar, V., & Cohen, A. (2003). The images of scientists and science among Hebrew- and Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 821–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4

  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2011(2), 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. D., Henley, T. B., & Snell, C. M. (2006). The Draw-A-Scientist test: A different population and a somewhat different story. College Student Journal, 40(1), 140–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (2013). Implications of problem based learning (PBL) in elementary schools upon the K12 engineering education pipeline (p. 18). Atlanta, GA: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Code 99351.

  • Valla, J. M., & Williams, W. M. (2012). Increasing achievement and higher-education representation of under-represented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A review of current K–12 intervention programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 18(1), 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wareing, C. (1982). Developing the WASP: Wareing attitudes toward science protocol. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(8), 639–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wareing, C. (1990). A survey of attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinburg, M. H., & Steele, D. (2000). The modified attitudes toward science inventory: Developing an instrument to be used with fifth grade urban students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 6, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenning, C. J. (2009). Scientific epistemology: How scientists know what they know. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(2), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua News Agency—CEIS. (2012). Indonesia’s research institute warns of looming scientist shortage. September 20.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [DGE-0841361]. We thank the teachers and fellows from the Flowing Waters and the SPartACUS GK-12 programs for their collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan J. Hillman.

Appendices

Appendix 1: MATS

figure a
figure b
figure c

Appendix 2: MATS scoring instructions

figure d

Attitude toward the school science, 14 Items, 7 positively worded; 7 negatively worded

Item number

Item—if in bold it should be reversed scored before analysis

2

I usually understand what we are talking about in science

7

Science is easy for me

9

Studying science is something that I enjoy very much

18

Most students seem to understand science

23

Science is one of my favorite subjects

24

I have a good feeling toward science

28

I like science classes

5

No matter how I try, I cannot understand what the teacher is describing in science class

6

It makes me nervous to even think about being in a science class

10

I do not do very well in science

15

I often think, “I cannot do this,” when science is being taught

20

It scares me to have to study science

31

I feel upset when someone talks to me about being in a science class

36

Science is hard for most students to understand

  1. Once all negative items are reversed score, have scores on these items added up for a total on the “Attitude toward the school science” dimension
  2. The higher the score the more positive the student’s attitude toward the school science

Desire to become a scientist, 2 items, 1 positively worded; 1 negatively worded

Item number

Item—if in bold it should be reversed scored before analysis

11

I would like a job as a scientist

30

I don’t want a job as a scientist, because I have no interest in it

  1. Once the one negative item is reversed score, have scores on these items added up for a total on the “Desire to become a scientist” dimension
  2. The higher the score the stronger the desire to work in the area of science

Value of science to society, 12 items, 6 positively worded; 6 negatively worded

Item number

Item—if in bold it should be reversed scored before analysis

12

Our world is nicer to live in because of science

29

People should understand science since it is an important part of their lives

34

Science helps solve the problems of everyday life

38

Technology is an example of an important product of science

39

A major purpose of science is to produce new drugs and save lives

40

Science is helpful to understand the world

4

People do not need to understand science because it does not affect their lives

8

Discoveries in science do not affect how I live

19

Science is not useful to anyone but scientists

26

Science discoveries do not help people live better

27

A country could be strong even if it has no scientists

32

The things scientists discover through their work do not affect other people in my life

  1. Once all negative items are reversed score, have scores on these items added up for a total on the “Value of science to society” dimension
  2. The higher the score the more science is valued

Perception of scientists, 12 items, all are stereotypes

Item number

Item

1

Scientists do not criticize other scientists’ work

3

Scientists work alone

13

Scientists work in labs

14

You have to be old to be a scientist

16

You have to be at least a little bit crazy to be a scientist

17

Scientists do not try to improve upon an explanation they have discovered about the world

21

Scientists are males

22

Scientists do not have enough time to have fun

25

Only thinking is important to scientists, not how they feel about something

33

In their work, scientists report exactly what they observe

35

Scientists wear lab coats

37

If one scientist says an idea is true, all other scientists will believe it

  1. Scores on these 12 items should be added together WITHOUT any reversal of scores needed since all items were written to reflect traditional stereotypical perceptions of scientists
  2. The higher the score, the more stereotypical ideation a student holds

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hillman, S.J., Zeeman, S.I., Tilburg, C.E. et al. My Attitudes Toward Science (MATS): the development of a multidimensional instrument measuring students’ science attitudes. Learning Environ Res 19, 203–219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9205-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9205-x

Keywords

Navigation