Abstract
This paper seeks to uncover and rationally reconstruct four theoretical prescriptions that H. L. A. Hart urged philosophers to observe and follow when investigating and theorizing about the nature of law. The four prescriptions may appear meager and insignificant when each is seen in isolation, but together as an inter-connected set they have substantial implications. In effect, they constitute a central part of Hart's campaign to put philosophical investigations about the nature of law onto a path to a genuine research program. The paper takes note of certain prevalent and robust trends in contemporary legal philosophy that detract its practitioners from the four prescriptions, and that have them revert to the some older modes of thinking from which Hart sought a decisive break. A number of contemporary legal philosophers' views and commitments are taken up and assessed, and in particular those of John Gardner and Leslie Green.
‘Yet the answer is a prosaic one: don’t ask what time is but how the word ‘time’ is being used’.
Friedrich Waismann.
I miss the future.
Jaron Lanier.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alston, William, ‘Ontological Commitments’, Philosophical Studies 9 (1958).
Bach, Kent, Thought and Reference, ppb ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987/1994).
Donnellan, Keith, ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’, Philosophical Review 75 (1966).
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘The Model of Rules II’, reprinted in Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977).
Frege, Gottlob, The Foundation of Arithmetic (J. L. Austin, tr.) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher, 1884/1953).
Gardner, John, ‘Law as a Leap of Faith’ (2000), reprinted in John Gardner, Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Gardner, John, ‘Some Types of Law’ (2008), reprinted in John Gardner, Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Gardner, John, Law as a Leap of Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Gardner, John and Timothy Macklem, Review of Shapiro (2011) in Gary Gutting (ed.), Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2011), http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/27609-legality/.
Gibbard, Allan, Thinking How to Live (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003).
Gilbert, Margaret, ‘Social Rules: Some Problems for Hart’s Account, and an Alternative Proposal’, Law and Philosophy 18 (1999).
Green, Leslie, ‘The Concept of Law Revisited’, Michigan Law Review 94 (1996).
Green, Leslie, ‘Positivism and Conventionalism’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12 (1999).
Green, Leslie, ‘Introduction' to H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012).
Green, Leslie, ‘The Morality in Law’, in Luís Duarte d’Almeida, James Edwards, and Andrea Dolcetti (eds.), Reading H. L. A. Hart’s ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013).
Greenberg, Mark, ‘How Facts Make Law’, Legal Theory 10 (2004).
Greenberg, Mark, ‘On Practices and the Law’, Legal Theory 12 (2006a).
Greenberg, Mark, `Hartian Positivism and Normative Facts: How Facts Make Law II', in Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Explaining Law’s Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006b).
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’ (1953), reprinted in Hart, H. L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Legal and Moral Obligation’, in A. I. Melden (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958).
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Scandinavian Realism’ (1959), reprinted in H. L. A. Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961/1994).
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Kelsen Visited’ (1963), reprinted in H. L. A. Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Legal Duty and Obligation’ (1966/1982), revised and reprinted in H. L. A. Hart, Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Commands and Authoritative Legal Reasons’, in H. L. A. Hart, Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
Kripke, Saul, Naming and Necessity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972/1980).
Leiter, Brian, ‘Explaining Theoretical Disagreements’, University of Chicago Law Review 76 (2009).
Levinson, Stephen, Pragmatics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
Marmor, Andrei, ‘Legal Conventionalism’, Legal Theory 4 (1998).
Marmor, Andrei, Social Conventions: From Language to Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).
Ogden, C. K., Bentham’s Theory of Fictions (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1932).
Place, U. T., ‘Is Consciousness a Brain Process?’, British Journal of Psychology 47 (1956).
Postema, Gerald, ‘Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of Law’, Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982).
Quine, W. V., ‘On What There is’ (1948), reprinted in W. V. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961).
Quine, W. V., ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in W. V. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).
Quine, W. V., ‘Five Milestones of Empiricism’, in W. V. Quine, Theories and Things (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981).
Raz, Joseph, ‘Kelsen’s Theory of the Basic Norm’ (1974), reprinted in Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).
Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms, 2nd ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975/1990).
Raz, Joseph, ‘Legal Validity’ (1977), reprinted in Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).
Russell, Bertrand, ‘On Denoting’ (1905), reprinted in Bertraind Russell, Logic and Knowledge (London: Unwin Hyman Limited, 1956).
Shapiro, Scott, ‘Law, Plans, and Practical Reason’, Legal Theory 8 (2002).
Shapiro, Scott, Legality (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011).
Smart, J. J. C., ‘Sensations and the Brain Processes’, Philosophical Review 68 (1959).
Stalnaker, Robert, ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1973).
Stalnaker, Robert, ‘Pragmatic Presuppositions’ (1974), reprinted in Robert Stalnaker, Context and Content (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Strawson, P. F., ‘On Referring’ (1950), reprinted in P. F. Strawson, Logico-Linguistic Papers (London: Methuen & Co., Ltd., 1971).
Strawson, P. F., Introduction to Logical Theory (London: Methuen & Co., Ltd., 1952).
Toh, Kevin, ‘Hart’s Expressivism and His Benthamite Project’, Legal Theory 11 (2005).
Toh, Kevin, ‘An Argument Against the Social Fact Thesis (and Some Additional Preliminary Steps Towards a New Conception of Legal Positivism)’, Law and Philosophy 27 (2008).
Toh, Kevin, ‘The Predication Thesis and a New Problem about Persistent Fundamental Legal Controversies’, Utilitas 22 (2010a).
Toh, Kevin, Review of Marmor (2009), Ethics 120 (2010b).
Toh, Kevin, ‘Legal Judgments as Plural Acceptances of Norms’, in Leslie Green and Brian Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law 1, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Toh, Kevin, Review of Gardner (2012), in Gary Gutting (ed.), Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2013), http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/39497-law-as-a-leap-of-faith/.
Toh, Kevin, ‘Plain-Attitudes, Plan-Contents, and Bootstrapping: Some Thoughts on the Planning Theory of Law’ (unpublished manuscript).
Waismann, Friedrich, ‘How I See Philosophy’ (1956), reprinted in Friedrich Waismann, How I See Philosophy (Rom Harré, ed.) (London: Macmillan, 1968).
Waismann, Friedrich, The Principles of Linguistic Philosophy (Rom Harré, ed.)(London: Macmillan, 1965).
Waismann, Friedrich, ‘On the Notion of Existence in Mathematics’, in Friedrich Waismann, Lectures on the Philosophy of Mathematics (Wolfgan Grassl, ed.) (Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V., 1982).
Waluchow, W. J., ‘Lessons from Hart’, Problema 5 (2011).
Whitehead, Kevin, New Dutch Swing (New York: Billboard Books, 1998).
Whitehead, A. N., and Bertrand Russell, Principia Mathematica, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910/1927).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, trs.) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1921/1961).
Yablo, Stephen, ‘Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?’ (1998), reprinted in Yablo, Things (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toh, K. Four Neglected Prescriptions of Hartian Legal Philosophy. Law and Philos 33, 689–724 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-013-9203-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-013-9203-4